Backstage vs. IBM Cloud Pak for AIOps

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Backstage
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Backstage is a pharmacy-focused CRM and marketing platform, from closerlook in Chicago.
$12.50
per user/per month
IBM Cloud Pak for AIOps
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
IBM Cloud Pak for AIOps (formerly IBM Watson AIOps) allows users to deploy advanced, explainable AI on an open platform to assess, diagnose, and resolve incidents across mission-critical workloads. With it, users can extend the event analytics from IBM Netcool Operations Insight with real-time analysis of unstructured data, holistic correlation, and ChatOps integration; or, users can augment an existing monitoring solutions.N/A
Pricing
BackstageIBM Cloud Pak for AIOps
Editions & Modules
Yearly
$12.50
per user/per month
Yearly
$13.25
per user/per month
6-Month
$16.66
per user/per month
Monthly
$19.95
per user/per month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
BackstageIBM Cloud Pak for AIOps
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Best Alternatives
BackstageIBM Cloud Pak for AIOps
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies

No answers on this topic

LogicMonitor
LogicMonitor
Score 8.7 out of 10
Enterprises

No answers on this topic

ignio AIOps
ignio AIOps
Score 8.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
BackstageIBM Cloud Pak for AIOps
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(1 ratings)
6.7
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
BackstageIBM Cloud Pak for AIOps
Likelihood to Recommend
closerlook
Backstage is well suited in building developer portal or developer platform. It can be easily customized as well, so different companies can use it based on their own situation. It currently focus more on frontend, but I can see there is already a roadmap for improving backend with some core modules. After that has been introduced, it will become really powerful and save developers time to solve common problems.
Read full review
IBM
IBM Watson AIOps is well suited for IT Asset Management tasks due to its insightful dashboard that leads our IT Team to track IT Asset usage/requirements in real-time. We have also enjoyed using the reports provided for IT Asset Management which we provide to our upper management team for predictive budgeting purposes. We found that IBM Watson AIOps is not as well suited for our Application resource automation as the tuning (aggressiveness) is not as tunable as we would like.
Read full review
Pros
closerlook
  • developer portal
  • easy to onboard
  • easy to extend
Read full review
IBM
  • Easy management of multiple data center from single platform.
  • Multiple host issues management and also nice file management tool.
  • Effective interactive chatbot building.
Read full review
Cons
closerlook
  • it may provide more modules that can solve common problems
Read full review
IBM
  • Deployment procedure documentation can be improved.
  • Fine tuning capabilities for IT Asset management could be improved.
  • Alerting features could be improved.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
closerlook
No answers on this topic
IBM
IBM Watson AIOps stacks up well with Turbonomic because it basically is Turbonomic. IBM added Turbonomic's feature set into IBM Watson AIOps and we were therefore quite comfortable shifting to the re-branded version introduced by IBM. We do like the fact that IBM Watson AIOps includes the functionality of Turbonomic.
Read full review
Return on Investment
closerlook
  • It speeds up our progress on building our own developer portal
  • It's free to use so very little investment
Read full review
IBM
  • Easy to manage and monitor services from one single platform.
  • The best and functional solution to host various Cloud environment.
  • The management of multiple document and files.
Read full review
ScreenShots