Calero vs. Responsive

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Calero
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
Calero is a Telecom Expense Management (TEM) product that helps companies manage their fixed and mobile networks by controlling costs, optimizing services, boosting efficiency and productivity, and enhancing security.N/A
Responsive
Score 7.5 out of 10
N/A
Responsive (formerly RFPIO), headquartered in Beaverton, offers their proposal management and automation software, featuring import and export, proposal knowledgebase and answer library, evaluation intake forms, and project management tools (e.g. Gantt chart) associated to proposal tracking.N/A
Pricing
CaleroResponsive
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CaleroResponsive
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
CaleroResponsive
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Features
CaleroResponsive
Proposal Creation & Organization
Comparison of Proposal Creation & Organization features of Product A and Product B
Calero
-
Ratings
Responsive
7.7
17 Ratings
3% below category average
Proposal branding00 Ratings8.111 Ratings
Proposal templates00 Ratings5.614 Ratings
Proposal content library updates00 Ratings9.117 Ratings
Guided proposal creation00 Ratings8.19 Ratings
Searchable proposal database00 Ratings7.417 Ratings
Proposal Collaboration & Workflow
Comparison of Proposal Collaboration & Workflow features of Product A and Product B
Calero
-
Ratings
Responsive
7.6
17 Ratings
6% below category average
RFP management & response00 Ratings8.217 Ratings
Proposal collaboration & approval00 Ratings8.216 Ratings
User permissions/proposal editing controls00 Ratings9.116 Ratings
Sales proposal workflow00 Ratings6.211 Ratings
Proposal automation user interface00 Ratings6.316 Ratings
Proposal Delivery
Comparison of Proposal Delivery features of Product A and Product B
Calero
-
Ratings
Responsive
8.1
13 Ratings
2% above category average
Proposal distribution00 Ratings8.110 Ratings
Interactive proposals00 Ratings8.17 Ratings
Proposal content tracking00 Ratings8.111 Ratings
Best Alternatives
CaleroResponsive
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

QuoteWerks
QuoteWerks
Score 9.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies

No answers on this topic

QuoteWerks
QuoteWerks
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises

No answers on this topic

Conga CPQ
Conga CPQ
Score 7.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
CaleroResponsive
Likelihood to Recommend
8.5
(2 ratings)
9.1
(18 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.7
(16 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.8
(16 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
CaleroResponsive
Likelihood to Recommend
Calero
Calero's robust telecom expense management and call accounting capabilities make it well suited for large organizations with complex communication expenses. Calero's mobile device management features make it well suited for our organization with employees who work remotely or in the field. As an organization that needs to keep our communication expenses within budget: Calero's cost control features, such as invoicing and payment management, make it well suited for our organization and keep our communication expenses within budget.
Read full review
Responsive (formerly RFPIO)
1. RFPIO is perfect for searching for specific information when you are responding to an RFP. Search engine is powerful. We narrow our search using several customized filters and know we are getting a thorough search. 2. Excel responses work very well in RFPIO. 3. Typical RFPs that are formatted in Word are challenging to run via RFPIO. We struggle with this. 4. We have yet to master the template.
Read full review
Pros
Calero
  • Improve business process agility
  • Creating internal/operational efficiencies
  • Simple to use very adaptable several points of integration
Read full review
Responsive (formerly RFPIO)
  • Live collaboration - the ability for multiple experts to simultaneously work on the same RFP.
  • Artificial intelligence - the ability for the product to continually learn what the best answers are and serve them up to our teams.
  • Dynamic branding - the ability for custom brand different templates by vertical, line of business, local branding, etc. with seamless transition.
  • Content review & moderation - the ability for our national content team to bulk review, edit and share content with our teams in a methodical way.
Read full review
Cons
Calero
  • User interface: The software's interface could be made more user-friendly, with more intuitive navigation and clearer presentation of data and information.
  • Data analytics: Calero's data analytics capabilities could be enhanced to provide more detailed and actionable insights into an organization's communication and information expenses.
Read full review
Responsive (formerly RFPIO)
  • Reporting and Analytics is basic, you can purchase advanced analytics though
  • It would have been nice to have a set structure in mind or a example/case study to structure our responses in the most appropriate way, but we are working through that with their stellar support team
  • Really great new features, but expensive
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Calero
No answers on this topic
Responsive (formerly RFPIO)
UI is friendly. Basically that alone is enough to renew because it is easy to use and gives accurate and fast results. The effective cross collaboration from other colleagues in my organization also makes for this tool to be extremely effective. Now that I understand how to use it, I can also easily train others on how to use it effectively.
Read full review
Support Rating
Calero
No answers on this topic
Responsive (formerly RFPIO)
The team at RFPIO is extremely responsive. If I email our account manager or report a bug, I usually hear back within two hours. Additionally, they are quick to make software adjustments based on customer requests and needs. We had a really complicated Excel sheet that their team ended up having to upload for me because of the amount of manual work I was doing. Based on that, they updated the software within two release cycles to make the process more automated, so that future Excel uploads would be more streamlined. I have also had several suggestions implemented rather quickly, and they don't hesitate to reach out for clarification when needed.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Calero
No answers on this topic
Responsive (formerly RFPIO)
We were able to complete an RFP during our free trial. We were already leaning toward RFPIO but that pushed us over the edge.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Calero
Calero may be a good choice for the organizations that are looking for a
well-established and well-regarded solution specifically for telecom
expense management, but may not be the best choice for organizations
with broader IT cost optimization needs.
Read full review
Responsive (formerly RFPIO)
RFPIO has outstanding, responsive, helpful customer support located in the US in Oregon. Support techs go the extra mile to help with basic issues and functionality training. Same-day support response and problem resolution are the norms. The system is also very user-friendly and very easy to navigate. Their Answer library is simple and far less complex than Qvidian/Inland. Little to no learning curve.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Calero
  • it helps us accurately and efficiently manage our telecom expenses
  • it identify cost reduction
  • our telecom investments are used in the most optimized
Read full review
Responsive (formerly RFPIO)
  • I don't have access to the actual ROI data, but we would continue to invest in RFPIO as a company only if it were providing us with the results to win RFPs.
  • RFPIO makes the task of filling out RFP responses much faster for me.
  • RFPIO helps our team be able to divide out RFP chores easily, because we know we all have access to the same high-quality source for information.
Read full review
ScreenShots