Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Chartbeat
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
Chartbeat delivers real-time analytics, insights, and transformative tools for content teams around the world, to help improve audience engagement, inform editorial decisions, and increase loyalty.N/A
Dynamic Yield
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Dynamic Yield is presented as an AI-powered Experience Optimization platform that delivers individualized experiences at every customer touchpoint: web, apps, email, kiosks, IoT, and call centers. The platform’s data management capabilities provide for a unified view of the customer, to allow the rapid and scalable creation of highly targeted digital interactions. Marketers, product managers, and engineers use Dynamic Yield for: Launching new personalization…N/A
Google Analytics
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
Google Analytics is perhaps the best-known web analytics product and, as a free product, it has massive adoption. Although it lacks some enterprise-level features compared to its competitors in the space, the launch of the paid Google Analytics Premium edition seems likely to close the gap.
$0
per month
Pricing
ChartbeatDynamic YieldGoogle Analytics
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Google Analytics 360
150,000
per year
Google Analytics
Free
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ChartbeatDynamic YieldGoogle Analytics
Free Trial
YesYesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesYesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsChartbeat pricing is based on monthly site page views. Discounts are applied to multi-year contracts. The Basic Plan includes the Real-time Dashboard, Historical Dashboard, Heads Up Display, Reports, Big Board, iOS and Android app, and Real-time API endpoints. The Plus Plan includes all of the Basic Plan features, plus ONE of the following Premium features: Headline Testing, Advanced Queries, or Multi-Site View. The Premium Plan includes all of the Basic Plan features, plus ALL Premium features: Headline Testing, Advanced Queries, Multi-Site View, and enterprise-level support and custom trainings.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
ChartbeatDynamic YieldGoogle Analytics
Considered Multiple Products
Chartbeat
Chose Chartbeat
Larger analytics suites like Google Analytics and Omniture simply do not provide the kind of real-time data that Chartbeat does. I have used Parse.ly which has some interesting real-time features as well; I would say Parse.ly is similar in terms of ease of use, though Chartbeat …
Chose Chartbeat
Google Analytics gives me a better overview of my site's performance, I think; however, when it comes to real-time insights, I always turn to Chartbeat.
Chose Chartbeat
In my opinion, Chartbeat should be paired with Google Analytics. Chartbeat is perfect for real-time results, an area GA lacks, and GA is best for long-term outlook.
Chose Chartbeat
Chartbeat stands out in terms of real-time tracking and information from which to manage homepages, I found this better than Smart Octo's equivalent. However, the ability to quickly explore past data does not go as deep as Google Analytics.
Chose Chartbeat
Google Analytics has gradually become much more difficult to use, and much slower in its realtime reporting. It was the changes that came in with Google Analytics 4 that gave us the final push to work with Chartbeat - a product some of us were already familiar with from …
Chose Chartbeat
Google Analytics 360 had problems, but after it was discontinued, Google Analytics became a shell of its former self. An added benefit of Chartbeat is that it's more "live" (looking at live concurrents rather than in the past however many minutes) and tells you how that number …
Chose Chartbeat
Chartbeat gives data in real time while Google has an analysis time. Furthermore, the tool is much easier and more intuitive to use.

O Chartbeat dá o dado em temporeal enquanto o Google tem um tempo de análise. Além disso, a ferramenta é de manuseio muito mais fácil e intuitiva.
Chose Chartbeat
Much easier to use and understand than GA4. We tested Marfeel, but felt Chartbeat was so good there was no reason to change.

I still feel like our audit is still based on GA4 so we do have to still pay attention to that.
Chose Chartbeat
Much more user friendly
Chose Chartbeat
Chartbeat's heads up display feature allows the newsroom to see key data right from our site.
Chose Chartbeat
Chartbeat is better than GA when it comes to ease of use and immediacy. The homepage layover that Chartbeat offers is unique from what I've seen and gives me an instant knowledge of what's working on my site and how to best arrange it.
Chose Chartbeat
Other products like Chartbeat that I've used are Parse.ly, GA, and Omniture. Parse.ly is the only tool, in my opinion, that offers more real-time data, but the interface is lacking and isn't as intuitive as Chartbeat.
Chose Chartbeat
Chartbeat is a lot easier to use.
Chose Chartbeat
Chartbeat is better for live metrics than either Adobe or Google, but Adobe Omniture especially is much better for tracking historic numbers.
Chose Chartbeat
Chartbeat is certainly better at visualizing content and segmenting the data all on one screen. We can filter by section, author, channel and more without leaving the main dashboard page. Combining properties together in roll up groups is another key feature. We're able to …
Chose Chartbeat
Chartbeat's realtime its superior to all tools we have. It really makes the difference. We are in calls with Chartbeat for raw data, this is a new product and it will be open a lot of interesting information with raw data in real-time.
Chose Chartbeat
Chartbeat really remains the gold standard in the tracking, measurement and display of realtime engagement metrics. If your site has sufficient audience benefit from immediate changes in content programming, display and design, it's a great tool with a highly refined and …
Chose Chartbeat
I think that one complements the other.
Dynamic Yield
Chose Dynamic Yield
Dynamic Yield is on a whole different level compared to anything I've tried before. The different types of campaigns you can make with DY covers all your needs. If you can't find a suiting campaign type, or even template, you can use Dynamic Content or Custom code to create …
Chose Dynamic Yield
No contest between Convert and Optimizely - those are very decent A/B test programs but also standard. The biggest contender was A/B Tasty and we chose DY due to the ease of client vs server side implementation within the platform and robust analytics/product recommendation …
Chose Dynamic Yield
Dynamic Yield was the most robust, flexible, and intuitive option, as well as the best fit for our Single Page Application environment.
Chose Dynamic Yield
I have not used other products in the same space as DY.
Chose Dynamic Yield
We moved from Qubit to Dynamic Yield for a number of reasons. Qubit was very clunky, had limited out-the-box capabilities and thus required a wait for coders to build tests or make small site changes. The features they intended to be quick and easy to use were invariably not, …
Chose Dynamic Yield
Monetate is good also but I found learning to navigate round DY so much quicker and easier.
May sound silly but the platform is also a lot cleaner in its design.
Chose Dynamic Yield
Dynamic Yield provides more complex and rich capabilities to create personalization.

Chose Dynamic Yield
Much more optimization possibilities. Deeper and automatic analysis of tests, product recommendations, email widgets and much more. VWO is the chimpanzee and Dynamic Yield the human.
Chose Dynamic Yield
Better capabilities. More user-friendly.
Chose Dynamic Yield
I haven't used any other, so I can't compare.
Chose Dynamic Yield
We found that Dynamic Yield offered the best balance of features, pricing, and support to launch and grow our testing program.
Chose Dynamic Yield
Now I have a single centralized tool for several things while before we had to maintain at least 3 tools to do what we are currently doing with Dynamic Yield. Having a single tool helped us a lot also in increasing our level of precision and to avoid fixes across different …
Chose Dynamic Yield
Dynamic Yield has a very user-friendly interface and more out-of-the-box templates to use very quickly after the short implementation phase.
Chose Dynamic Yield
We have not used any other tool but went through discovery with a couple other vendors. In the end, Dynamic Yield won for its ease of use and customer service. As well, another key factor was the ability to trigger personalization in email, which a number of other vendors do …
Chose Dynamic Yield
This alternative is cheaper and does its job. They appear to be new and hungry for business and therefore we were able to get more attentions from them. The reporting function is easier to understand than the above providers and we don't have to spend time trying to calculate …
Chose Dynamic Yield
[It has] the most confident functionality of use cases. It's hard to implement something and it does not work because of something wrong on the Dynamic Yield side.
Chose Dynamic Yield
DY is cheaper and allows for more customization for AB testing
Chose Dynamic Yield
When we've compared solutions, Dynamic Yiled impressed us as better in terms of their focus on e-commerce, built-in features, durability, value for money and agility.
Chose Dynamic Yield
First of all, the other tools we looked at was more focused on A/B testing and personalization but one of the that we loved immediately of Dynamic Yield was the recommendation engine: given that we were missing such a feature in our e-commerce, that really made the difference.

An…
Chose Dynamic Yield
I have used Optimizely in the past but the out of the box features Dynamic Yield offers really is a cut above.

The use of custom actions have been invaluable in enabling us to really bridge the gap between our online and offline worlds. I haven't come across any other tool that …
Chose Dynamic Yield
Dynamic Yield performs quite well, but Google solutions are a major competitor.
Chose Dynamic Yield
I have used Visual Website Optimizer previously which was recommended by an agency; they are both similar tools. Though simply on the support factor I feel Dynamic yield is better suited for our business. We have been using the tool now for over two years, and have had a lot of …
Google Analytics
Chose Google Analytics
Google Analytics has its advantages over its competitors. It is well suited to smaller companies.
Chose Google Analytics
It's free, nothing beats that! It is easier to use than most other platforms I have used. You can create customized reports on the fly and they are high quality too. Despite the fact that there are so many other other analytics management platforms, Google Analytics remains a …
Chose Google Analytics
I like Google Analytics better than Adobe Analytics because it has a much better user interface. It is easier to use and is easier to set up reports. While these two can be used hand-in-hand I would prefer only using Google Analytics because I find that it is easier to find the …
Chose Google Analytics
If it was my choice I would have used IBM Digital Analytics (DA) for everything. DA has it quirks but it really gives some deep analysis on the data and with a bit of development work you can really get all the data you could possibly want. If every website and newsletter was …
Features
ChartbeatDynamic YieldGoogle Analytics
Web Analytics
Comparison of Web Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Chartbeat
7.7
15 Ratings
5% below category average
Dynamic Yield
-
Ratings
Google Analytics
8.4
11 Ratings
4% above category average
Lead Conversion Tracking6.15 Ratings00 Ratings8.110 Ratings
Bounce Rate Measurement7.19 Ratings00 Ratings8.410 Ratings
Device and Browser Reporting7.714 Ratings00 Ratings9.211 Ratings
Pageview Tracking8.713 Ratings00 Ratings9.011 Ratings
Event Tracking7.98 Ratings00 Ratings8.311 Ratings
Reporting in real-time9.314 Ratings00 Ratings7.910 Ratings
Referral Source Tracking8.414 Ratings00 Ratings8.510 Ratings
Customizable Dashboards6.812 Ratings00 Ratings7.910 Ratings
Best Alternatives
ChartbeatDynamic YieldGoogle Analytics
Small Businesses
StatCounter
StatCounter
Score 9.0 out of 10
Bloomreach - The Agentic Platform for Personalization
Bloomreach - The Agentic Platform for Personalization
Score 8.9 out of 10
StatCounter
StatCounter
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Optimal
Optimal
Score 9.1 out of 10
Monetate
Monetate
Score 6.1 out of 10
Optimal
Optimal
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
Optimal
Optimal
Score 9.1 out of 10
Monetate
Monetate
Score 6.1 out of 10
Optimal
Optimal
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
ChartbeatDynamic YieldGoogle Analytics
Likelihood to Recommend
9.9
(69 ratings)
9.5
(107 ratings)
8.5
(192 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.9
(9 ratings)
10.0
(5 ratings)
9.0
(51 ratings)
Usability
9.9
(60 ratings)
9.1
(26 ratings)
7.4
(19 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(4 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(2 ratings)
Support Rating
8.1
(10 ratings)
10.0
(47 ratings)
7.0
(42 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(2 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(7 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
6.0
(2 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(2 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
ChartbeatDynamic YieldGoogle Analytics
Likelihood to Recommend
Chartbeat
The main point of benefit is the realtime data. This is vital to our team as we are publishing a lot of content per day, so we have a busy homepage to manage and it's important to know which content is performing well. We also like to get an understanding as quickly as possible - which Chartbeat offers - of where traffic is coming from. Often we will see an example where a page is getting high traffic from Google, for example, and we know that might not need to be placed so prominently on the homepage because the traffic is arriving to us externally anyway. Without that depth of understanding what is performing best and why - updated immediately, unlike in Google Analytics now - our homepage would not be as well optimised for users coming to us direct
Read full review
Dynamic Yield by Mastercard
For us, it is well suited for personalization. Since we are hospitality brand, we have different rooms sales inclusion based on different segmentation like Mem or Non-mem, Global or UAE, we have to personalize our landing pages accordingly so that we show the relevant information to relevant audience. The inactivity pop up box and newsletter signup popups work good for us. It does not work well in some scenario like Dynamic Yield offers built-in analytics focused on campaign and test performance, but it’s not a replacement for tools like GA4, Adobe Analytics. It lacks deep funnel tracking or complex reporting capabilities.
Read full review
Google
Google Analytics is particularly well suited for tracking and analyzing customer behavior on a grocery e-commerce platform. It provides a wealth of information about customer behavior, including what products are most popular, what pages are visited the most, and where customers are coming from. This information can help the platform optimize its website for better customer engagement and conversion rates. However, Google Analytics may not be the best tool for more advanced, granular analysis of customer behavior, such as tracking individual customer journeys or understanding customer motivations. In these cases, it may be more appropriate to use additional tools or solutions that provide deeper insights into customer behavior.
Read full review
Pros
Chartbeat
  • Provides easy at-a-glance look at what people are reading right now
  • Heads-up Display allows you to make sure the homepage is showing the content people want to read
  • Headline testing tool provides fascinating insight into what makes people read a story and improves headline-writing ability
Read full review
Dynamic Yield by Mastercard
  • Provide fantastic support, both in relation to strategy/best practice and troubleshooting.
  • An easy to use interface, as a user who is relatively new to Dynamic Yield I find that it is an intuitive platform to use.
  • The ability to segment and drill down on data allows for really specific insights which, whilst not necessarily being leveraged on a testing basis, can be super valuable from a greater marketing perspective.
Read full review
Google
  • Multiple reports to see website use and behavior
  • Allows you to customize reports with days, weeks, months, and years
  • You can build out a dashboard to easily view stats from multiple websites in one place
  • You can share analytics reports via the dashboard, automatically emailed PDFs or in other formats
Read full review
Cons
Chartbeat
  • Source of traffic needs improvement. Search and social make sense, but "internal" and "links" is a grey area. It would be helpful to define those with an organization and provide an information icon so users can easily remember what each of those buckets is tracking.
  • More ways to customize the real-time board. For example, with video content, that's great that I can see a user has started a video, but what is the completion rate, was that only on O&O or can that track Facebook, too?
  • Would like to see demo (age) information included as a way to slice the data so I can see what's working with my older and younger demo.
Read full review
Dynamic Yield by Mastercard
  • Brand templates could need complex CSS/custom code.
  • We'd like to see a little "i" next to specific labels, which elaborates on what is meant. For example, when I hover over "Dynamic allocation," I get something like "An advanced form of A/B testing where the best-performing variations receive higher traffic."
  • Jargon (for example, for audience targeting) can be overwhelming for new users; therefore, clearer, user-friendly explanations are needed.
Read full review
Google
  • Data sampling is somewhat inaccurate on the free tier - this is addressed in premium but is expensive.
  • Some of the UI is very similar in naming when presenting different data, some in-situ information might be useful.
  • Gotchas around filtering and data validation.
  • Implementation can be tricky, it can take a lot of time and expertise to get a full, accurate picture of your metrics.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Chartbeat
I gave Chartbeat a 5 for a renewal rating, because, while it delivers clear and understandable content, Google Analytics also provides many of the same features for free. For a small to medium website, I believe it would be more cost effective to use Google Analytics. A website with a high amount of traffic, however, could merit spending the money on Chartbeat to maximize their potential.
Read full review
Dynamic Yield by Mastercard
implementation took a long time but also, DY has really proven that they are transforming and adapting their platform to be more user friendly and the right technology choice for their brand or company
Read full review
Google
We will continue to use Google Analytics for several reasons. It is free, which is a huge selling point. It houses all of our ecommerce stores' data, and though it can't account for refunds or fraud orders, gives us and our clients directional, real time information on individual and group store performance.
Read full review
Usability
Chartbeat
I am able to "set it and forget it," keeping it up on my monitor for either constant checking or just keeping an eye on the numbers during the day. I'm also able to keep track of what times are perfect to post a story and which stories rack up the most traffic.
Read full review
Dynamic Yield by Mastercard
Setting up strategies, audiences, and experiences is simple and fast. It is incredibly easy to modify the appearance of your site and optimize every aspect with the Dynamic Yield Personalizations. However, while the data visualization on an experience level is easy to modify and analyze, exporting the data in meaningful ways is time consuming.
Read full review
Google
Google Analytics provides a wealth of data, down to minute levels. That is it's greatest detriment: find the right information when you need it can be a cumbersome task. You are able to create shortcuts, however, so it can mitigate some of this problem. Google is continually refining Analytics, so I do not doubt there will be improvements
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Chartbeat
No answers on this topic
Dynamic Yield by Mastercard
No answers on this topic
Google
We all know Google is at top when it comes to availability. We have never faced any such instances where I can suggest otherwise. All you need is a Google account, a device and internet connection to use this super powerful tool for reporting and visualising your site data, traffic, events, etc. that too in real time.
Read full review
Performance
Chartbeat
No answers on this topic
Dynamic Yield by Mastercard
No answers on this topic
Google
This has been a catalyst for improving our site's traffic handling capabilities. We were able to identify exit% from our sites through it and we used recommendations to handle and implement the same in our sites. We have been increasing the usage of Google Analytics in our sites and never had any performance related issues if we used Analytics
Read full review
Support Rating
Chartbeat
I have had limited experience of support for Chartbeat but whenever I have needed help it has been there. Recently there was an issue of seeing different forms of data in real time - app and otherwise effectively, and the issue was being clearly dealt with and communicated back to us.
Read full review
Dynamic Yield by Mastercard
Overall, the support is very good. If you are a partner (my case), they assign you a customer success manager, that helps a lot. Also, there is a technical person to provide support to the partners, again a great help.
My only "complain" is that with some complex issues, the support may delay in providing you with a solution. Sometimes that can cause some tension with your client.
Read full review
Google
The Google reps respond very quickly. However, sometimes they can overly call you to set up an apportionment. I'm very proficient and sometimes when I talk to reps, they give beginner tutorials and insights that are a waste of time. I wish Google would understand my level of expertise and assign me to a rep (long-term) that doesn't have to walk me through the basics.
Read full review
Online Training
Chartbeat
No answers on this topic
Dynamic Yield by Mastercard
No answers on this topic
Google
love the product and training they provide for businesses of all sizes. The following list of links will help you get started with Google Analytics from setup to understanding what data is being presented by Google Analytics.
  1. How to Use Google Analytics for Beginners – Mahalo’s how-to guide for beginners.
  2. A beginner’s guide to Google Analytics – A free eBook walking you through Google Analytics from setup to understanding what data is being presented.
  3. Getting to Know Your Google Analytics Dashboard – The title says it all! This is a brief post with one goal: to introduce you to the Google Analytics dashboard.
  4. Google Analytics for Beginners: How to Make the Most of Your Traffic Reports– This guide doesn’t cover setup, but it does a great job of helping you to better understand the data being presented.
  5. Google Analytics Video Tutorial 1: Setup – A video presentation that walks you through Google Analytics setup.
  6. Google Analytics Video Tutorial 2: Essential Stats – A video presentation that introduces you to some of the most important data being presented in Google Analytics.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Chartbeat
No answers on this topic
Dynamic Yield by Mastercard
No answers on this topic
Google
I think my biggest take away from the Google Analytics implementation was that there needs to be a clear understanding of what you want to achieve and how you want to achieve it before you start. Originally the analytics were added to track visitors, but as we became more savvy with the product, we began adding more and more functionality, and defining guidelines as we went along. While not detrimental to our success, this lack of an overarching goal resulted in some minor setbacks in implementation and the collection of some messy data that is unusable.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Chartbeat
Omnilytics is more robust, detailed, and catered for an intermediate media user, while I think Chartbeat is a more user-friendly and beginner-oriented piece of technology. That being said, there is an impressive amount of lift for Chartbeat, and it's evident that simplicity is the key to using a software daily (which is absolutely the point in the content world).
Read full review
Dynamic Yield by Mastercard
Dynamic Yield provides far more capability and ready-to-go templates for small-medium sized businesses, as well as decent API implementation for businesses who want to have a deeper integration. The ease of implementation and faster time-to-market is why we chose Dynamic Yield.
Read full review
Google
I have not used Adobe Analytics as much, but I know they offer something called customer journey analytics, which we are evaluating now. I have used Semrush, and I find them much better than Google Analytics. I feel a fairly nontechnical person could learn Semrush in about a month. They also offer features like competitive analysis (on content, keywords, traffic, etc.), which is very useful. If you have to choose one among Semrush and Google Analytics, I would say go for Semrush.
Read full review
Scalability
Chartbeat
No answers on this topic
Dynamic Yield by Mastercard
No answers on this topic
Google
Google Analytics is currently handling the reporting and tracking of near about 80 sites in our project. And I am not talking about the sites from different projects. They may have way more accounts than that. Never ever felt a performance issue from Google's end while generating or customising reports or tracking custom events or creating custom dimensions
Read full review
Return on Investment
Chartbeat
  • It has helped us save time in report generation and performance analysis.
  • By helping us evaluate our contributors, we're able to get our money's worth.
  • Seeing our numbers on the Big Board fosters healthy competition among brands, motivating us to distribute our stories better.
Read full review
Dynamic Yield by Mastercard
  • Most tests have had a positive impact on either revenue or conversion rate - quite often in double digits.
  • Dynamic Yield has also helped us to stop some particular initiatives through direct interaction with the customer base via questionnaires or by a test proving negative quicker than rolling out a permanent feature.
Read full review
Google
  • It has helped us gain understanding of what is going on on our website.
  • It has helped us determine areas that need fixing (i.e. pages with extremely high bounce rates may need to be redone).
  • It has helped us understand our biggest avenues for bringing traffic to the website and business in general.
  • It has helped guide our website redesign.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Chartbeat Screenshots

Screenshot of Big Board: For newsrooms, the leaderboard-style visualization shows the top stories on the biggest screen.Screenshot of Real-time dashboard: Displays how an audience is connecting with content in the moment – across platforms, channels, and devices.Screenshot of Historical Dashboard: To assess content performance, KPIs, and valuable trends over the long term.Screenshot of Heads Up Display: Shows which homepage articles are the top performers, how stories are trending up or down in traffic, and how far visitors are scrolling down the page.Screenshot of Video Dashboard: Reveals how video content captures viewer attention.Screenshot of Conversion Dashboard: Tracks conversion metrics and insights.

Dynamic Yield Screenshots

Screenshot of The Dynamic Yield Dashboard, which offers a high-level overview of personalization campaigns, site performance, audiences, product updates, and more. With customers building and managing dozens, sometimes even hundreds of concurrent campaigns, the Dynamic Yield dashboard provides a snapshot of key information and surfaces items for potential optimization from campaigns that require action.Screenshot of Dynamic Yield's customer segmentation engine, used to unify customer data across digital and offline touchpoints. Data can be onboarded from multiple sources to create one cohesive dataset from which to power experiences. Users can collect, store, categorize, and synchronize data from a CRM, ESP, DMP, APIs, or POS.Screenshot of The interface to create cross-touchpoint personalization campaigns and experiments at scale. Users can coordinate independent personalization experiences to deliver a cohesive, consistent customer journey from start-to-finish.Screenshot of Dynamic Yield's Predictive Targeting capabilities, which provides machine-learning optimization. Dynamic Yield’s Predictive Targeting engine will continuously analyze and identify opportunities to serve the most relevant content for each audience segment.