What users are saying about
Top Rated
122 Ratings
195 Ratings
Top Rated
122 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 9.3 out of 100
195 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 8.3 out of 100

Feature Set Ratings

    NoSQL Databases

    9.1

    IBM Cloudant

    91%

    Elasticsearch

    Feature Set Not Supported
    N/A
    IBM Cloudant ranks higher in 7/7 features

    Performance

    9.0
    90%
    19 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Availability

    8.8
    88%
    19 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Concurrency

    9.0
    90%
    19 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Security

    9.5
    95%
    19 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Scalability

    9.6
    96%
    19 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Data model flexibility

    8.6
    86%
    19 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Deployment model flexibility

    9.5
    95%
    19 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Attribute Ratings

    • IBM Cloudant is rated higher in 2 areas: Likelihood to Recommend, Support Rating
    • Elasticsearch is rated higher in 3 areas: Likelihood to Renew, Usability, Implementation Rating

    Likelihood to Recommend

    9.4

    IBM Cloudant

    94%
    43 Ratings
    9.1

    Elasticsearch

    91%
    46 Ratings

    Likelihood to Renew

    7.3

    IBM Cloudant

    73%
    1 Rating
    10.0

    Elasticsearch

    100%
    1 Rating

    Usability

    7.7

    IBM Cloudant

    77%
    5 Ratings
    10.0

    Elasticsearch

    100%
    1 Rating

    Availability

    8.2

    IBM Cloudant

    82%
    2 Ratings

    Elasticsearch

    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Performance

    8.2

    IBM Cloudant

    82%
    2 Ratings

    Elasticsearch

    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Support Rating

    8.6

    IBM Cloudant

    86%
    6 Ratings
    7.8

    Elasticsearch

    78%
    18 Ratings

    Online Training

    7.3

    IBM Cloudant

    73%
    2 Ratings

    Elasticsearch

    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Implementation Rating

    8.2

    IBM Cloudant

    82%
    8 Ratings
    9.0

    Elasticsearch

    90%
    2 Ratings

    Configurability

    8.5

    IBM Cloudant

    85%
    5 Ratings

    Elasticsearch

    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Product Scalability

    9.6

    IBM Cloudant

    96%
    23 Ratings

    Elasticsearch

    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Vendor pre-sale

    9.1

    IBM Cloudant

    91%
    1 Rating

    Elasticsearch

    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Likelihood to Recommend

    IBM

    Our organization found Cloudant most suitable if One, a fixed pricing structure would make the most sense, for example in a situation where the project Cloudant is being used in makes its revenue in procurement or fixed retainer — thus the predictability of costs is paramount; Two, where you need to frequently edit the data and/or share access to the query engine to non-engineers — this is where the GUI shines.
    Read full review

    Elastic

    Elasticsearch is a really scalable solution that can fit a lot of needs, but the bigger and/or those needs become, the more understanding & infrastructure you will need for your instance to be running correctly. Elasticsearch is not problem-free - you can get yourself in a lot of trouble if you are not following good practices and/or if are not managing the cluster correctly. Licensing is a big decision point here as Elasticsearch is a middleware component - be sure to read the licensing agreement of the version you want to try before you commit to it. Same goes for long-term support - be sure to keep yourself in the know for this aspect you may end up stuck with an unpatched version for years.
    Read full review

    Pros

    IBM

    • For us, performance and scalability is the key, and Cloudant DB backed by CouchDB is scalable and performant.
    • IBM Cloudant dB is very easy to provision for sandbox, development, QA as well as production.
    • Support for Java for CouchDB app server analytics enables a greater control for over developers.
    • Schema free oriented very easy to program and build applications on it.
    • We love it!!
    Read full review

    Elastic

    • As I mentioned before, Elasticsearch's flexible data model is unparalleled. You can nest fields as deeply as you want, have as many fields as you want, but whatever you want in those fields (as long as it stays the same type), and all of it will be searchable and you don't need to even declare a schema beforehand!
    • Elastic, the company behind Elasticsearch, is super strong financially and they have a great team of devs and product managers working on Elasticsearch. When I first started using ES 3 years ago, I was 90% impressed and knew it would be a good fit. 3 years later, I am 200% impressed and blown away by how far it has come and gotten even better. If there are features that are missing or you don't think it's fast enough right now, I bet it'll be suitable next year because the team behind it is so dang fast!
    • Elasticsearch is really, really stable. It takes a lot to bring down a cluster. It's self-balancing algorithms, leader-election system, self-healing properties are state of the art. We've never seen network failures or hard-drive corruption or CPU bugs bring down an ES cluster.
    Read full review

    Cons

    IBM

    • It was only after we went with the cloud-based solution that IBM rolled out an on-premise version.
    • We found that a 3rd-party ODBC driver was required for a few applications that needed to pull data out of Cloudant.
    • The sales process was difficult because the salesperson we used was not as versed on Cloudant as I had hoped.
    Read full review

    Elastic

    • Joining data requires duplicate de-normalized documents that make parent child relationships. It is hard and requires a lot of synchronizations
    • Tracking errors in the data in the logs can be hard, and sometimes recurring errors blow up the error logs
    • Schema changes require complete reindexing of an index
    Read full review

    Pricing Details

    IBM Cloudant

    Starting Price

    $0 20 reads/second ; 10 writes/second ; 5 global queries / second ; 1 GB of storage capacity

    Editions & Modules

    IBM Cloudant editions and modules pricing
    EditionModules
    LiteFree1
    Standard$752
    StandardIncluded3
    Standard$14

    Footnotes

    1. 20 reads/second ; 10 writes/second ; 5 global queries / second ; 1 GB of storage capacity
    2. per month 100 reads/second ; 50 writes/second ; 5 global queries/second
    3. per month 20 GB of storage
    4. per month per GB of storage above the included 20 GB

    Offerings

    Free Trial
    Free/Freemium Version
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services

    Entry-level set up fee?

    No setup fee

    Additional Details

    Pricing Info

    Elasticsearch

    Starting Price

    $0

    Editions & Modules

    Elasticsearch editions and modules pricing
    EditionModules
    Standard$16.001
    Gold$19.002
    Platinum$22.003
    EnterpriseContact Sales4

    Offerings

    Free Trial
    Free/Freemium Version
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services

    Entry-level set up fee?

    No setup fee

    Additional Details

    Likelihood to Renew

    IBM

    the flexibility of NoSQL allow us to modify and upgrade our apps very fast and in a convenient way. Having the solution hosted by IBM is also giving us the chance to focus on features and the improvement of our apps. It's one thing less to be worried about
    Read full review

    Elastic

    We're pretty heavily invested in ElasticSearch at this point, and there aren't any obvious negatives that would make us reconsider this decision.
    Read full review

    Usability

    IBM

    It's mostly just a straight forward API to a data store. I knock one off for the full text search thing, but I don't need it much anyways. Also, the dashboard UI they give is pretty nice to use. It provides syntax-highlighting for writing views and queries are easy to test. I wish other DBs had a UI like this.
    Read full review

    Elastic

    To get started with Elasticsearch, you don't have to get very involved in configuring what really is an incredibly complex system under the hood. You simply install the package, run the service, and you're immediately able to begin using it. You don't need to learn any sort of query language to add data to Elasticsearch or perform some basic searching. If you're used to any sort of RESTful API, getting started with Elasticsearch is a breeze. If you've never interacted with a RESTful API directly, the journey may be a little more bumpy. Overall, though, it's incredibly simple to use for what it's doing under the covers.
    Read full review

    Reliability and Availability

    IBM

    it is a highly available solution in the IBM cloud portfolio and hence we have never had any issues with the data base being available - we also do continuous replication to be on the safer side just in case some thing goes awry. We also perform twice a year disaster recovery tests.
    Read full review

    Elastic

    No answers on this topic

    Performance

    IBM

    very easy to get started and is very developer friendly given that it uses couchDB analytics. It is a cloud based solution and hence there is no hardware investment in a server and staging the server to get started and the associated delays/bureaucracy involved to get started. Good documentation is also available.
    Read full review

    Elastic

    No answers on this topic

    Support Rating

    IBM

    Very happy by the commitment given by the team which has been really good over the last 7 years of usage.
    Read full review

    Elastic

    We've only used it as an opensource tooling. We did not purchase any additional support to roll out the elasticsearch software. When rolling out the application on our platform we've used the documentation which was available online. During our test phases we did not experience any bugs or issues so we did not rely on support at all.
    Read full review

    Online Training

    IBM

    online resources are good enough to understand but there is nothing like testing. In our case, we discovered some not documented behavior that we take in count now. Also, the experience in NodeJs is critical. Also, take in count that most of the "good practices" with cloudant are not in online courses but in blogs and pages from independent developers
    Read full review

    Elastic

    No answers on this topic

    Implementation Rating

    IBM

    • Test the architecture on CouchDB helped us to address initial design flaws.
    • The migration to Cloudant as such was very painless.
    • We have migrate our replication system to Cloudant Android Sync for mobile devices.
    • We have regular informal contact with the Cloudant leadership to discuss our use cases and implementation strategies.
    Read full review

    Elastic

    Do not mix data and master roles. Dedicate at least 3 nodes just for Master
    Read full review

    Alternatives Considered

    IBM

    The feature-set, including security, is very comparable. Overall, IBM's services added to the product are mature and stable, although product support and engineers could be a little better. Global availability is improving, and Disaster Recover Capabilities are great. Overall, it's very comparable to MongoDB as a DBaaS offer, available globally and with great documentation.
    Read full review

    Elastic

    As far as we are concerned, Elasticsearch is the gold standard and we have barely evaluated any alternatives. You could consider it an alternative to a relational or NoSQL database, so in cases where those suffice, you don't need Elasticsearch. But if you want powerful text-based search capabilities across large data sets, Elasticsearch is the way to go.
    Read full review

    Scalability

    IBM

    The service scales incredibly well. As you would expect from CloudDB and IBM combination. The only reason I wouldn't score it a 10 is the fact that document trees can get nested and nested very quickly if you are attempting to do very complex datasets. Which makes your code that much more complex to deal. Its very possible we could find a solution to this problem with better database planning to begin with, but one of the reasons we chose a service over a self-hosted solution was so we could set it up quick and forget about it. So we weren't going to dedicate a team to architecture optimization.
    Read full review

    Elastic

    No answers on this topic

    Return on Investment

    IBM

    • IBM Cloudant is very secure and we never have to worry about losing data/unauthorized access
    • It is one of the best data backup system and works well
    • Global availability means it is easy to connect to the nearest data center and this reduces load time which is great.
    Read full review

    Elastic

    • We have had great luck with implementing Elasticsearch for our search and analytics use cases.
    • While the operational burden is not minimal, operating a cluster of servers, using a custom query language, writing Elasticsearch-specific bulk insert code, the performance and the relative operational ease of Elasticsearch are unparalleled.
    • We've easily saved hundreds of thousands of dollars implementing Elasticsearch vs. RDBMS vs. other no-SQL solutions for our specific set of problems.
    Read full review

    Add comparison