CloudKeeper vs. ProsperOps

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
CloudKeeper
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
CloudKeeper is an AWS FinOps solution that aims to help businesses save anywhere between 5% to 15% on their monthly AWS spend. Key benefits, as provided by the vendor - Instant access to AWS volume pricing discounts No pre-payments, long-term revenue, or volume commitments needed Involves billing transition only It is a purely a financial construct and doesn't require any access to AWS account or data, and there is no…N/A
ProsperOps
Score 9.8 out of 10
N/A
ProsperOps is a fully autonomous cost optimization solution for Amazon Web Services (AWS) that helps organizations save money and manage risk. It aims to help customers increase their Effective Savings Rate by an average of 68%, returning material dollars back to their cloud budgets. At the same time, ProsperOps can reduce risk by aligning commitment timelines and shrinking term length. Using real-time telemetry from the user's cloud environment, ProsperOps…N/A
Pricing
CloudKeeperProsperOps
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CloudKeeperProsperOps
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
CloudKeeperProsperOps
Considered Both Products
CloudKeeper

No answer on this topic

ProsperOps
Chose ProsperOps
To see the aggregated costs on AWS billings, we may purchase the service through AWS Marketplace instead of viewing it in ProsperOps' dashboard. Now that we're using it for AWS, we're talking with our clients about adding it to Microsoft Azure, too, so that we can make use of …
Top Cons
Best Alternatives
CloudKeeperProsperOps
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
ServiceNow IT Asset Management
ServiceNow IT Asset Management
Score 8.8 out of 10
ServiceNow IT Asset Management
ServiceNow IT Asset Management
Score 8.8 out of 10
Enterprises
vRealize Operations (discontinued)
vRealize Operations (discontinued)
Score 8.3 out of 10
vRealize Operations (discontinued)
vRealize Operations (discontinued)
Score 8.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
CloudKeeperProsperOps
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
CloudKeeperProsperOps
Likelihood to Recommend
TO THE NEW
No answers on this topic
ProsperOps
Our firm spends the majority of its cloud budget on EC2 instances, Fargate deployments, and Lambda executions. Automated modifications to discount portfolios based on changes in workloads allow ProsperOops to handle our shifting workloads with ease. In order to meet our net cloud budget requirements, it always follows a high-quality SP (Savings Plan) Portfolio management strategy.
Read full review
Pros
TO THE NEW
No answers on this topic
ProsperOps
  • The arbitrage strategy is effective. It's hard to believe how good the service is.
  • It is a plug-and-forget approach for ProsperOps.
  • It costs ProsperOps a percentage of the savings they make.
Read full review
Cons
TO THE NEW
No answers on this topic
ProsperOps
  • The inclusion of RDS and Elasticache in cost management is something I'd be all for.
  • When it comes to EC2 capacity reservations, ProsperOps only includes reserved instances in the region where we are located.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
TO THE NEW
No answers on this topic
ProsperOps
To see the aggregated costs on AWS billings, we may purchase the service through AWS Marketplace instead of viewing it in ProsperOps' dashboard. Now that we're using it for AWS, we're talking with our clients about adding it to Microsoft Azure, too, so that we can make use of the tool's cloud cost control and visibility capabilities.
Read full review
Return on Investment
TO THE NEW
No answers on this topic
ProsperOps
  • Our Effective Savings Rate has risen since we started using ProsperOps.
  • Our AWS bill savings will cover the cost of the service.
  • As much as 95.4% of our compute on-demand costs are covered by ProsperOps, and all of the savings are put to good use.
Read full review
ScreenShots

ProsperOps Screenshots

Screenshot of