2 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener noreferrer'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 7 out of 100
10 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener noreferrer'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 7 out of 100

Likelihood to Recommend

Corcentric Source-to-Pay Platform (Determine / Selectica)

It is well suited for applications which has centralized data system. For desperate databases, big performance hit could be unavoidable.Web based Sales solutions which could be easily unplugged from big infrastructure and to be used in field with no need of network connectivity or front office availability would be ideal candidates for CPQ
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

GEP SMART

They are starting to expand in the direct procurement area and it would be good to see continued offerings in this area. The GEP supplier portal is a great way for suppliers to maintain visibility and increase efficiencies without an additional charge to the supplier. It has a high ease of use.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Pros

Corcentric Source-to-Pay Platform (Determine / Selectica)

  • Pricing engine is a big plus in CPQ.
  • The flex modeling supported in CPQ increases the model efficiency by eliminating unwanted options
  • Integrating external tools into selectica by exporting out xmls make it easier
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

GEP SMART

  • SMART is flexible and scalable.
  • The account team is there to listen client concerns and business needs.
  • The engineering team is will to share their concepts in development and vet with their clients prior to production release. They value client feedback.
  • GEP has a lot of progressive thinkers and willing to invest in new technology trends such as AI, Machine Learning, digital adoption, etc.
Karen Rhee | TrustRadius Reviewer

Cons

Corcentric Source-to-Pay Platform (Determine / Selectica)

  • Model builder's sluggishness.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

GEP SMART

  • Our organization has yet to take advantage of upgrading to the latest version of GEP SMART. The version that we are on does not make use of the full screen for the different internal windows and pop-up windows. I find it cumbersome to scroll left-right and up-down on the smaller windows when there is much real-estate on the screen that could optimize the user interface.
  • GEP SMART provides technical support but our vendors seem to have some difficulty logging in to their profile and updating their information. Occasionally, the salesperson delegates to another internal member so we'll have to set up the new member with their log in.
  • The digital signature process requires that the signers of the agreement be defined before the agreement is routed for approval. Sometimes our vendors have a pool of signers that could sign the agreements and it can become a small challenge to change the signers after it has already been defined in GEP SMART.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Likelihood to Renew

Corcentric Source-to-Pay Platform (Determine / Selectica)

Corcentric Source-to-Pay Platform (Determine / Selectica) 5.0
Based on 1 answer
Unless CPQ is available on cloud or available as platform as service, I am less likely to consider it again. The initial cost involved is high and also the time required for that.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

GEP SMART

No score
No answers yet
No answers on this topic

Usability

Corcentric Source-to-Pay Platform (Determine / Selectica)

No score
No answers yet
No answers on this topic

GEP SMART

GEP SMART 7.2
Based on 8 answers
The application is highly usable, but there are some parts of the design that could be improved such as the layout and scaling on the pages, the amount of unused white space within the interface and the consistency of the interface between modules.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Performance

Corcentric Source-to-Pay Platform (Determine / Selectica)

No score
No answers yet
No answers on this topic

GEP SMART

GEP SMART 7.1
Based on 15 answers
GEP SMART is very efficient. With pre-designed templates loaded into the modules, it is a large time-saver to issue RFxs and complete spend analysis.
Timothy McDonnell | TrustRadius Reviewer

Alternatives Considered

Corcentric Source-to-Pay Platform (Determine / Selectica)

I used Saleslogix.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

GEP SMART

When we have evaluated other spending solutions providers, we always select GEP in the end due to the excellent customer service and support that we get from the Technical Team.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Return on Investment

Corcentric Source-to-Pay Platform (Determine / Selectica)

  • yes, faster lead conversion as Field sales team rely less on main office
  • reduced sales cycle.
  • Reduced Sales overheads, deal closure can happen at client location.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

GEP SMART

  • Easy access to global spend.
  • Normalization of vendor names across global ERP systems.
  • Extraction of Rfx supplier responses into one easy-to-analyse format.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Screenshots

Corcentric Source-to-Pay Platform (Determine / Selectica)

Pricing Details

Corcentric Source-to-Pay Platform (Determine / Selectica)

General

Free Trial
Free/Freemium Version
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Entry-level set up fee?
No

GEP SMART

General

Free Trial
Free/Freemium Version
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Entry-level set up fee?
No

Add comparison