Koala vs. Writer

Carrying out the quality control process allows me to carry out the organization, details [are] written instantly, and progress of the same as well as personalize them. Regarding the interface, I would change it for a more graphic one. On the other hand[,] writer navigates my content of complex documents and thus be able to have shortcuts[.]

Incentivized

• Automated correction
• Words auto complete
• Writing Style

Incentivized

• There is some setup required to get your word lists in there, adjust your editing style, and set up typical errors, but otherwise it works similarly to other programs (but worth it in my opinion).
• Their web editor loses formatting, which several team members have complained about. However, formatting is properly retained in GDocs, Word, and the Chrome extension. There is some setup required to get your word lists in there, adjust your editing style, and set up typical errors, but otherwise it works similarly to other programs (but worth it in my opinion).
• I wish it were easy to provide solutions to complex problems rather than simply highlighting them.

Incentivized

Grammarly is very advanced, but I use Writer as It offers me additional features like word count, a cleaner interface, and a word processor for taking notes.

Incentivized

• For its part Writer has built-in drawing tools, facilitating my work on new basic technological creations.
• It also has a complete equation editor when quantifying any report.
• But it has a limited group of Fonts and at the same time has a slow processing speed

Incentivized