Kubecost vs. XoSphere Instance Orchestrator

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Kubecost
Score 7.3 out of 10
N/A
Founded by ex-Google cloud engineers and PMs, Stackwatch headquartered in San Francisco, aims to enable teams to operate Kubernetes and cloud native infrastructure at scale. Their flagship product Kubecost is presented as tooling and intelligence to manage cost, performance, reliability and other infrastructure operability challenges.
$449
per month
XoSphere Instance Orchestrator
Score 0.0 out of 10
Small Businesses (1-50 employees)
What is a Spot instance? Amazon sells EC2 virtual instances in three ways. On-Demand instances offer the greatest flexibility as they can be turned up and down at any moment and customers are billed for only what they use. While convenient, On-Demand is the most expensive option. Reserved instances offer customers an easy way of reducing cost by about 40%, although they require a…N/A
Pricing
KubecostXoSphere Instance Orchestrator
Editions & Modules
Business
$449
per month 100 nodes
Enterprise
Custom Quote
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
KubecostXoSphere Instance Orchestrator
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsThe software is free to install and you only pay a fee if we help you save, the fee being only 12% of your on-demand rate for the number of hours you're able to leverage Spot instances...the result always being net savings.
More Pricing Information
Best Alternatives
KubecostXoSphere Instance Orchestrator
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
ServiceNow IT Asset Management
ServiceNow IT Asset Management
Score 8.8 out of 10
ServiceNow IT Asset Management
ServiceNow IT Asset Management
Score 8.8 out of 10
Enterprises
vRealize Operations (discontinued)
vRealize Operations (discontinued)
Score 8.3 out of 10
vRealize Operations (discontinued)
vRealize Operations (discontinued)
Score 8.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
KubecostXoSphere Instance Orchestrator
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
KubecostXoSphere Instance Orchestrator
Likelihood to Recommend
Stackwatch, Inc (Kubecost)
Well suited for a k8 platform and the clients on the platform however doesn’t help as much for a total enterprise cloud cost that is not running on k8
Read full review
CloudInsyte
No answers on this topic
Pros
Stackwatch, Inc (Kubecost)
  • Show namespace level cost and usage
  • Allow rightisizibg At namespace level
  • Show effectiveness of current resources allocation
Read full review
CloudInsyte
No answers on this topic
Cons
Stackwatch, Inc (Kubecost)
  • Agents installation and the ping fed integration
  • The amount of CPU Kubecost agents use
Read full review
CloudInsyte
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Stackwatch, Inc (Kubecost)
Namespace cost, usage and efficiency data and ability to optimize for k8 containers
Read full review
CloudInsyte
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Stackwatch, Inc (Kubecost)
  • Allowed individual teams to better their cloud architecture for cost efficiency
  • Save on cloud investment
Read full review
CloudInsyte
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots

XoSphere Instance Orchestrator Screenshots

Screenshot of We can save you 40-80% on AWS EC2 - Here is a snapshot of an actual customer’s dashboard who is currently saving over 78%. These results are truly inspiring, yet they are not uncommon.