Lightning Forms is a SharePoint list form design tool that aims to enable users to improve the logic, layout and styling of responsive SharePoint Forms. Lightning Forms offers cascading lookups, customized buttons with actions, repeating lists integration, tab controls, styling and conditional control formatting, calculations, and expressions. These features help users to build business forms within SharePoint and offers an alternative to InfoPath Forms.
$2,200
per year per installation
OpenText LiquidOffice
Score7 out of 10
N/A
OpenText offers LiquidOffice as a solution for users to create, publish and process forms using with their forms automation solution to help capture and validate actionable customer data, automate line of business workflows and enhance existing application ecosystems.
N/A
Pricing
Lightning Tools Lightning Forms
OpenText LiquidOffice
Editions & Modules
Lightning Forms OnPrem
From $2000
per year per installation
Lightning Forms Plus OnPrem
From $3500
per year per installation
Lightning Forms OnPrem Enterprise Edition
POA
per year per installation
Lightning Forms (Online)
From $2200
per year per installation
Form Designer Suite (Online)
From $4000
per year per installation
Lightning Forms Enterprise Edition (Online)
POA
per year per installation
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Lightning Tools Lightning Forms
OpenText LiquidOffice
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
Prices stated are minimum per installation for "stock" products.
$2.2 & $4.00 per user/year for each product ion top of base price.
Enterprise editions can be amended to suit business needs if deemed necessary, additional costs incurred and TBD.
All packages include free technical support.
Free upgrades available to latest versions of tool as they are released. (online versions)
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Lightning Tools Lightning Forms
OpenText LiquidOffice
Survey Format & Appearance
Comparison of Survey Format & Appearance features of Lightning Tools Lightning Forms and OpenText LiquidOffice
Feature
Lightning Tools Lightning Forms
8.2
1 Ratings
2% above category average
OpenText LiquidOffice
7.3
3 Ratings
10% below category average
Custom logo/branding
8.21 Ratings
7.03 Ratings
Survey templates
00 Ratings
7.33 Ratings
Themes
00 Ratings
7.73 Ratings
Survey Content
Comparison of Survey Content features of Lightning Tools Lightning Forms and OpenText LiquidOffice
Feature
Lightning Tools Lightning Forms
8.6
1 Ratings
1% above category average
OpenText LiquidOffice
7.1
3 Ratings
18% below category average
Changes to live survey
9.11 Ratings
7.03 Ratings
Multiple question types
8.21 Ratings
7.03 Ratings
Question design help
00 Ratings
7.43 Ratings
Survey Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Survey Reporting & Analytics features of Lightning Tools Lightning Forms and OpenText LiquidOffice
Feature
Lightning Tools Lightning Forms
9.1
2 Ratings
11% above category average
OpenText LiquidOffice
6.2
3 Ratings
27% below category average
Data export
9.12 Ratings
7.13 Ratings
Standard reports
9.11 Ratings
6.13 Ratings
Response tracking
00 Ratings
5.73 Ratings
Custom reports
00 Ratings
6.43 Ratings
Analytics
00 Ratings
5.73 Ratings
Survey Administration & Security
Comparison of Survey Administration & Security features of Lightning Tools Lightning Forms and OpenText LiquidOffice
Feature
Lightning Tools Lightning Forms
9.1
2 Ratings
5% above category average
OpenText LiquidOffice
6.2
3 Ratings
33% below category average
Access controls
9.12 Ratings
5.43 Ratings
Compliance
9.11 Ratings
7.03 Ratings
Survey Logic
Comparison of Survey Logic features of Lightning Tools Lightning Forms and OpenText LiquidOffice
Feature
Lightning Tools Lightning Forms
-
Ratings
OpenText LiquidOffice
7.7
3 Ratings
8% below category average
Survey logic flexibility
00 Ratings
7.73 Ratings
Survey Distribution
Comparison of Survey Distribution features of Lightning Tools Lightning Forms and OpenText LiquidOffice
Overall, there are many use cases for which Lightning Forms provides a slick, easy to develop and extremely useful solution. Request forms that need to be actioned and inspection forms are the scenarios that we have used them for so far, which have seen a lot of success. We have decided that other scenarios that are perhaps more sensitive, for instance forms that may contain special category data relating to our customers, are less appropriate given the permissions/licensing constraints of both SharePoint and Lightning Forms.
OpenText LiquidOffice would be most suitable if you engage or already use the large array of OpenText information management solutions; as integrations would be swift. From my experience LiquidOffice has been a successful investment to provide secure eForms from authenticated users. The PDF standalone forms are flexible enough to be opened on any browser or PDF viewer. It is a superb solution to collect and validate information from your audiences.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Simple user interface - users of the forms intuitively aware of how/where to input information. This is in part due to being able to show or hide different questions or areas of the form, and making them required or not, based on previous answers.
Low/simple code - building complex forms with automation and multiple dependencies or lookups is relatively easy once you get started. You have the power of JavaScript to use and do some quite clever things if you can get to grips with it - a lot of solutions are only a Google away.
As it is based on SharePoint, it integrates perfectly with the rest of the M365 suite. Things like PowerAutomate enhance its functionality even further.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The styling of the form can sometimes be slightly awkward to use depending on what you're looking to do. For instance, if I was looking to highlight fields that users have missed (left empty), I would need to set up a validation for that question and then set a style for that particular field for when it is invalid. When you have a large and complex form with lots of dependencies, this is awkward.
Support for complex and niche issues is slightly lacking in my experience. I submitted a helpdesk ticket for help with a strange issue I couldn't figure out, which took several weeks to get a response to. Because it is niche, it's more difficult to find an answer by searching the internet. Luckily, knowing there is likely to always be a fix if you find the right place/use the right formula, I manage to resolve the issue with some trial and error.
It is disappointing that Lightning Forms does not integrate with the MS Lists app. Having the ability to access the form through the list app would add in a lot of useful functionality, including a better experience for users when taking photos to add as attachments.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
It is very user friendly both to me who is building the content (with little background knowledge of coding etc., other than what I have picked up from using products like PowerAutomate, PowerBI, a bit of html etc.) and to end users of varying levels of IT proficiency. This has been extremely important as we have used the forms to make relatively large process changes, and need to have our users on board and seeing that it is actually easier than it was before.
It's easy to use from both ends; form creator and the one filling the surveys. It's easy to view the forms from all browsers with ease. It's also simple to use due to the drag and drop process modelling to configure forms in minutes with smooth scripting and integration capabilities.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Some support has been okay, but in one instance of a fairly complex problem, the support team were not able to provide me with a fix within a few weeks, before I was able to find a workaround myself.
Not very good especially with its ever increasing feature set. It becomes a little clunky in the beginning. Although most of the features are easy to use, a basic tech support or training module could do wonders for the software
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We were using Microsoft Forms, SharePoint Lists and PowerAutomate to attempt to do much of what we are currently doing. Functionality is very limited in comparison. The ability to make questions required based on previous answers was a massive improvement from normal SharePoint List forms and has greatly improved the quality of data. Also just the very visual display and customisation is much better.
OpenText LiquidOffice's has a very simple to understand and relatively powerful form builder. The workflow designer is also very easy to pick up and requires users to have minimal training. OpenText Liquid Office does look a lot older than other products in its class though and I feel would benefit from a more fresh and modern design.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We changed the process by which site colleagues report repairs on behalf of customers. Instead of emailing them into a shared inbox, they now report them using a lightning form. We have seen a great improvement in the time taken for our team to log the repair issue from the time is arrives with them.
We anticipate that streamlining our void property reletting process by using a SharePoint kanban board view with lightning forms (providing a single platform for all things void) will reduce avoidable days vacant and therefore reduce our void loss.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info