MCA Suite vs. Womply

It is a good tool for smaller companies entering the MCA space, but doesn't scale all that well, and provides limited options for reporting customization.

Incentivized

It is best suited if you want to try and achieve more reviews of your business. It is also good if you do not want to take time responding to reviews. By the same token, it is less appropriate when auto-response is turned on. If there is a negative review, it is better to address it in person, as there may be a specific customer service issue that a computer response is not going to understand.

Incentivized

• They have lots of detail on the deal pages.
• It allows for multiple internal and external users.
• It has global search functionality.

Incentivized

• Invites credit card users to leave a review.
• Alerts me when a review has been made.
• It can also provide an automated response on the rated website.

Incentivized

• Poor reporting.
• Filtering is clunky.
• They could improve on data visualization.
• Renewal advances that are not refinances are difficult to manage.

Incentivized

• The automated responses to ratings are a too mechanical in response.
• There is not a lot of direct follow up with me as a user.
• It would be helpful if a person at Womply would put together a monthly review and opportunities that we might be missing out on.

Incentivized

We haven't used any others.

Incentivized

• We've been able to grow our working capital program over the years with the help of MCA Suite.
• Data management is difficult, and we struggle with reporting.
• We have granted merchants dedicated to their advances for tracking purposes.

Incentivized

• There are no hard numbers but we do average 3-4 reviews per week when it used to be 1 or 2 a month.
• More ratings, especially positive, helps reflect on our business model and are good for us to see how we are really doing with customers.

Incentivized