Microsoft Build of OpenJDK vs. NitroAccelerator

Microsoft Build of OpenJDK

NitroAccelerator

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Microsoft Build of OpenJDK	Score 7.8 out of 10	N/A	The Microsoft Build of OpenJDK is a no-cost distribution of OpenJDK that's open source and available for free for anyone to deploy anywhere. It includes Long-Term Support (LTS) binaries for Java 11 and Java 17 on x64 server and desktop environments on macOS, Linux, and Windows, AArch64/ARM64 on Linux and Windows, binaries for macOS on Apple Silicon (AArch64/M1), and musl libc compiled binaries for Alpine Linux on x64.	$0
NitroAccelerator	Score 8.3 out of 10	Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)	NitroAccelerator installs as a device driver to endpoints to optimize TCP-based connections. The solution is software-based and does not rely on third party proxies, distributed caching, lateral data-movement, or hardware appliances. The vendor states that NitroAccelerator is EPL Certified and approved to run on DoD networks with no known vulnerabilities or direct-competing vendors and is currently accelerating and securing enterprise-level connections all over the world.	N/A

Pricing

Microsoft Build of OpenJDK

NitroAccelerator

Editions & Modules

No answers on this topic

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
Microsoft Build of OpenJDK	NitroAccelerator
Free Trial
No	Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Yes	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	Yes

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

—

First year Maintenance & Support (M&S) are included in the license price. For the second year on, annual M&S will be charged at 20% of the original license price.

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	Microsoft Build of OpenJDK	NitroAccelerator
Top Pros	No answers on this topic	Pro Data transfer Pro Easy to setup
Top Cons	No answers on this topic	Minus Product needs Minus New server Minus Sql database

Best Alternatives
	Microsoft Build of OpenJDK	NitroAccelerator
Small Businesses	GraalVM Score 9.1 out of 10	No answers on this topic
Medium-sized Companies	GraalVM Score 9.1 out of 10	Cisco Routers Score 8.4 out of 10
Enterprises	GraalVM Score 9.1 out of 10	Cisco Routers Score 8.4 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Microsoft Build of OpenJDK	NitroAccelerator
Likelihood to Recommend	7.5 (2 ratings)	9.1 (1 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Microsoft Build of OpenJDK	NitroAccelerator
Likelihood to Recommend	Microsoft I think of a few areas when looking at Microsoft Build of OpenJDK. The first is what is your cost to run for your intended product or project, if you are strapped and fall within the supported areas of Microsoft Build of OpenJDK then it's a no brainer, Microsoft Build of OpenJDK is for you! Lastly, I think of support in the respect to running into a wall and needing a fix. It can take a while for open source tools to produce fixes that the community warrants, so again if you aren't strapped for time and haven't run into a wall and could afford to wait for fixes or relevant patches then again Microsoft Build of OpenJDK is for you. Not everyone has this luxury, but these are a few areas to think about. Incentivized Harvey Wyche Director of Product Management Read full review	Nitrosphere If you have an analytics-supporting SQL Server instance on a VM or bare metal, this is for you. Any large queries will get a massive speed-up. If you're using a DBaaS, then you would need to set up a proxy VM to see the benefits. If you have a transactional-only database, you won't likely see any benefits. Steven Hibble SVP Data Operations Read full review
Pros	Microsoft Support for the Java libraries that are common use today Support for various architecture environments - Mac, Windows, Linux, etc... Provides a low cost or rather no cost alternative Incentivized Harvey Wyche Director of Product Management Read full review	Nitrosphere No answers on this topic
Cons	Microsoft Since it's open source, enterprise support is less than as if you are running paid like an Oracle JDK. Performance is improving and is I would say on par with paid solutions, this could improve to help with growth. Stability will happen over time with more contributions and fixes Incentivized Harvey Wyche Director of Product Management Read full review	Nitrosphere No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered	Microsoft Microsoft Build of OpenJDK stacks up against Oracle JDK (paid) very well. From both a performance, implementation, library support, and collaboration aspect. Incentivized Harvey Wyche Director of Product Management Read full review	Nitrosphere No answers on this topic
Return on Investment	Microsoft No cost alternative to paid JDK platforms Performance is that of paid JDK platforms in my opinion Community contribution is a bonus for contributed code and open collaboration Incentivized Harvey Wyche Director of Product Management Read full review	Nitrosphere No answers on this topic
ScreenShots