MuPDF vs. OpenText LiquidOffice

OpenText LiquidOffice would be most suitable if you engage or already use the large array of OpenText information management solutions; as integrations would be swift. From my experience LiquidOffice has been a successful investment to provide secure eForms from authenticated users. The PDF standalone forms are flexible enough to be opened on any browser or PDF viewer. It is a superb solution to collect and validate information from your audiences.

Incentivized

• Form processes & routing - Makes it very easy at an enterprise level
• Integration with 3rd party & external forms
• Automation of forms with less coding making it useful for quick turnarounds

Incentivized

• Very old UI
• Feels like an archaic system
• Reporting isn't great

Incentivized

It's easy to use from both ends; form creator and the one filling the surveys. It's easy to view the forms from all browsers with ease. It's also simple to use due to the drag and drop process modelling to configure forms in minutes with smooth scripting and integration capabilities.

Incentivized

Not very good especially with its ever increasing feature set. It becomes a little clunky in the beginning. Although most of the features are easy to use, a basic tech support or training module could do wonders for the software

Incentivized

OpenText LiquidOffice's has a very simple to understand and relatively powerful form builder. The workflow designer is also very easy to pick up and requires users to have minimal training. OpenText Liquid Office does look a lot older than other products in its class though and I feel would benefit from a more fresh and modern design.

Incentivized

• We collect authenticated data from our users and audiences to improve our services.
• The surveys give us a better understanding of our markets.

Incentivized