NGINX Plus vs. Pivotal tc Server

I think that NGINX Plus could be used in place of a hardware load balancer and it would be light weight and easier to configure than a hardware based load balancer but in terms of usability a GUI for said load balancer would definitely help in setting up

Incentivized

-Pivotal tc Server is best used as web application server on a virtual machine for middleware purposes -I feel it is less appropriate to be used with utilizing data that does not need to be secure

Incentivized

• Load balancing
• Caching
• App security
• Boost App performance

Incentivized

• send a receive HL7 message securely
• details issues and errors in logs
• very reliable uptime record with no system crashes

Incentivized

• Update full config via api

Incentivized

• User management and administration access account setup has room for improvement and can be more user friendly and clearly list how many admin accounts we can setup
• password complexity for user accounts need to be updated
• although all logs list all errors some of the tomcat errors are not time stamped

Incentivized

The API and dashboard alone make NGINX Plus a better choice.

Incentivized

We selected Pivotal tc Server opposed to Cent0s Linux because Pivotal tc Server is more reliable and causes less downtime , also better logging. I have used both

Incentivized

• More uptime for business critical applications
• Less overhead for administrator to maintain the applications

Incentivized

• one positive is that we can securely send patient data across to our food service dept.
• another positive is that we can integrate the communication with our patient tv terminals
• third positive is that there is less downtime because it is reliable

Incentivized