ReadCube Papers vs. Zotero

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
ReadCube Papers
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
Digital Science company ReadCube now offers Papers, a reference management application.
$36
per user
Zotero
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
Zotero is a free reference management tool developed as a project developed at Carnegie Mellon and supported by a small team at George Mason University.N/A
Pricing
ReadCube PapersZotero
Editions & Modules
Student
$36.00
per user
Academic (Indivdual)
$60.00
per user
Corporate
$120.00
per user
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ReadCube PapersZotero
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
ReadCube PapersZotero
Top Pros
Top Cons

No answers on this topic

User Ratings
ReadCube PapersZotero
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(2 ratings)
9.4
(4 ratings)
User Testimonials
ReadCube PapersZotero
Likelihood to Recommend
Digital Science
ReadCube Papers has become an indispensable tool for my research. It offers a solution that keeps my library of research articles organized, and has improved the numbers of papers I am reading and annotating. The user-friendly interface simplifies the process of categorizing papers, highlighting essential text, and adding personal notes directly to the documents. The library is available online and through their own in-house application, which has worked perfectly (and much better than other solutions I have tried to use previously). In short, ReadCube Papers has truly improved the way I manage my research materials, making my academic life much more efficient and enjoyable.
Read full review
Open Source
Zotero is well suited for any researcher, student or writer that wants to easily cite sources for web platforms that do not have easy citing tools integrated within the website. There are many browser plug-ins built for Zotero that allow users to click a button directly from the source into the main software and from there can be more organized for citation export. Zotero doesn't work well if you open an external PDF from a website as it cannot pull author information correctly from a PDF source.
Read full review
Pros
Digital Science
  • Easy including references to projects
  • Easily share literature with clients and teammates
  • Cross-reference on Microsoft Word
Read full review
Open Source
  • Zotero, when paired with the Zotfile plugin, makes it incredibly easy to index sources and documents on a project-by-project basis. Users can store document files locally in a Zotero project filesystem, or merely store links to files stored elsewhere.
  • Zotero plays extremely nicely with PDF documents, thanks again to the Zotfile plugin: I can highlight sections of a PDF article's text and Zotero indexes these "pull quotes" in a searchable and well-organized manner for easy extraction when it comes time to synthesize my sources into a new paper.
  • Zotero automates the production of properly-formatted references (including APA, MLA, Chicago, and others), making it a breeze to create accurate and complete bibliographies.
  • Zotero's library system provides a straightforward graphical user interface to manage multiple research projects and associated files, including the ability to easily add items to a project by ISBN, DOI, PMID, and arXiv IDs.
Read full review
Cons
Digital Science
  • Extract content of single document as annotations for project
  • See documents as a part of a project, not just a list of names
Read full review
Open Source
  • Libre office integration was iffy
  • Using different word processors (i.e, Word, then Google Docs on the same file) can "break" embedded citations.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Digital Science
The graphic user interface is beautiful; adding literature to a project is a seamless process, annotations while collaborating are intuitive and sometimes even fun. Competitors might be cheaper but do not consolidate all the tools that ReadCube has been able to achieve.
Read full review
Open Source
Zotero is much less prone to glitches than Mendeley, and has much easier to use web extensions and word processor plugins. I found Zotero easy and intuitive to use
Read full review
Return on Investment
Digital Science
  • It has saved us while sharing documents with colleagues and clients.
  • It helped us improve our writing process metrics, time and outcome.
Read full review
Open Source
  • More Credibility on Our Online Posts that is Informational
  • Less Chances of Potential Legal Issues When Writing
  • Less Time Spent Grabbing Sources from Browser History When Researching
Read full review
ScreenShots

ReadCube Papers Screenshots

Screenshot of Automatic meta-data matching, organizational collections, personal and shared spaces, and article previewsScreenshot of Automatic matching of available supplements when you import the main paper into PapersScreenshot of Share your collections with your collaboratorsScreenshot of Left panel within the reader offers a breadth of information including figure browsers, reference list, notes panel, supplements, metrics, citation export and related articlesScreenshot of Our enhanced reader comes with hyperlinked inline references and an array of annotation tools including inline notes, post-its, highlighting and draw featuresScreenshot of Left panel within the reader offers a breadth of information including figure browsers, reference list, notes panel, supplements, metrics, citation export and related articles