WatchGuard Network Security is a network security and firewall software. WatchGuard includes secure Wi-Fi, multi-factor authentication, and network intelligence products and services designed for SMB’s.
Overall, the two products are very comparable to one another. In the end, it came down to throughput vs cost. WatchGuard [Network Security] came in at around half the cost for the device that provided the amount of throughput that we needed. All of the other features were neck …
Night and day comparison. Sonicwall is clunky, outdated, lacks good reporting facilities. Network traffic management is painful. And doesn't have the extensive services provided by default by WatchGuard
Cisco is just horrible. Includes nothing as standard. Scared to touch …
Encargado de infraestructura y telecomunicaciones.
Chose WatchGuard Network Security
SolarWinds Network Firewall Security Management vs WatchGuard Network Security. We tried to apply the other solution but it was very complicated and had many requirements to work. Unlike WatchGuard Network Security. Everything was very easy to understand and use, a very …
Paid log server where you have to pay for the space you want to put the logs away, Paid migration to another device, Paid second license in case of Clustra Activ-Pasiv, at every step you have to pay for something which is problematic when adding new options.Fast delivery, model …
Compared to the meraki that I've worked with in the past, I like that I'm not paying Cisco tax and there is a lot more functionality with WG. For me, the Sophos Hardware is not hefty enough to handle their OS because the UI is so slow. Ubiquiti doesn't even compete and …
I would much prefer utilizing WatchGuard Network Security. When stacked against any Unifi product, WatchGuard Network Security is vastly superior. When compared with Meraki, I have much greater control over WatchGuard Network Security Fireboxes. When compared to fortinet or …
WatchGuard was far easier to configure that my Fortinet or Sophos, the D-Link routers are just as easy as the WatchGuard to set up since the DSR series, but do not offer the security of the WatchGuard.
The WatchGuard Network Security interface does not require command line configuration, which was not the case when I last used a Cisco ASA. The UI is very powerful and easy to use and from what we can tell has provided a similar level of security, with a lower level of …
Price mainly, Both are great products, Check Point is a better management interface with the possibility to expand/collapse a set of rules, and negate rules parameters.
Microsoft works great when users are roaming (i.e. remote workers). WatchGuard Network Security works great when in a single location (i.e. in an office).
WatchGuard offers a wide range of security products and services, including firewalls, endpoint security, secure Wi-Fi solutions, multi-factor authentication, and network visibility tools. By choosing WatchGuard, you can implement a comprehensive security strategy that protects …
All around appliance with attractive cost and maintenance expense. Easy setup for simple or simpler networks with limited sites and remote users. Complex network configuration could be challenging.
WatchGuard Network Security has shown me much more value than Azure Firewall to the extent that I have used it. The most prominent thing I have noticed is from the pricing perspective. WatchGuard Network Security costs for a year what Azure Firewall costs for a month. For …
We used to use Symantec Endpoint Security. We felt that when acquired by Broadcom they lost interest in small business sales and became a pain to work with. WatchGuard Network Security solutions gave us everything we liked about Symantec and a whole lot more with a better …