Item: BlueJeans Meetings
Rating: 9
Author: Jori Santeri Eskolin

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

I have used BlueJeans as the main tool for remote meetings with customers. And I will continue using BlueJeans: zero problems so far. I think BlueJeans is the most suitable tool for having a real-time dialogue with customers and screen sharing with the possibility to draw something is really important.

Pros and Cons

Screensharing
Audio/Visual: quality and reliability
Usability in general
User interface is clear and simple.

Blurring: Only thing that is not working properly (when in use, the picture is really unclear).

Return on Investment

Follow-up and open dialogue with customers.

Key Insights

Do you think BlueJeans Meetings delivers good value for the price?

Yes

Are you happy with BlueJeans Meetings's feature set?

Yes

Did BlueJeans Meetings live up to sales and marketing promises?

Yes

Did implementation of BlueJeans Meetings go as expected?

Yes

Would you buy BlueJeans Meetings again?

Yes

Likelihood to Recommend

For my use, BlueJeans is the best alternative. For me important things are:
1. Connecting via browser (visitors).
2. Sharing screen.
3. Usage with Outlook (calendar).
4. Reliability (zero problems so far).

I have used Teams, Zoom, GoToMeeting, and Google and BlueJeans offers the best reliability, audio/visual- quality, the easiest way to use screen sharing (with the possibility to draw on-line), and break-out rooms are easy to use. Also the possibility to modify the meeting itself with your own background, etc. is really nicely handled by BlueJeans.

BlueJeans: The best way to communicate

Overall Satisfaction with BlueJeans Meetings