Do we need SearchInform?
November 30, 2021
Do we need SearchInform?
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Overall Satisfaction with SearchInform Risk Monitor
The system is the most functional compared to competitors. Setting up the system is quick and easy. Reports are diverse, technical support will quickly help you create the necessary report or develop new ones. It should be understood that DLP systems initially show a lot of false-positive positives. This is solved by fine-tuning the system, which are configured quite easily. The system integrates with many other IT systems. For example, Active Directory, Exchange, Office 365, IGMP, Proxy, and others. We started getting the first results soon after the implementation and even prevented one data leak due to human error by solving the problem with the help of an employee who did not know what could and could not be sent outside the corporate perimeter. Of the minuses, I would like to note the cumbersomeness of the system for administrators and a database based on MS SQL.
Pros
- Collecting information.
- Separate indexing.
- Lots of useful functionality.
Cons
- Change Microsoft SQL.
- Need fewer consoles.
- No UBA.
- Control of information flows
- Accounting of working hours
- Blocking confidential information
- Compliance with the requirements of the regulator
- Reduced risk of confidential information leakage
- Control of working hours has been introduced
Do you think SearchInform Risk Monitor delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with SearchInform Risk Monitor's feature set?
Yes
Did SearchInform Risk Monitor live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of SearchInform Risk Monitor go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy SearchInform Risk Monitor again?
Yes
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation