Agile Hive - SAFe in Jira vs. GitLab

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Agile Hive - SAFe in Jira
Score 7.6 out of 10
N/A
The world of work is constantly changing. Agile work processes in particular are becoming increasingly popular. Even large companies are trying to introduce agile working methods. For many, the Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe) is the right solution for their agile teams. However, implementing SAFe with all its features such as providing reports, visualizing dependencies and automated documentation is not always easy in reality. Many companies spend a lot of time and money searching for the right…N/A
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
GitLab DevSecOps platform enables software innovation by aiming to empower development, security, and operations teams to build better software, faster. With GitLab, teams can create, deliver, and manage code quickly and continuously instead of managing disparate tools and scripts. GitLab helps teams across the complete DevSecOps lifecycle, from developing, securing, and deploying software. Differentiators, as described by Gitlab: Simplicity: With GitLab, DevSecOps can…
$0
per month per user
Pricing
Agile Hive - SAFe in JiraGitLab
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
GitLab Essential
$0
per month per user
GitLab Premium
$29
per month per user
GitLab Ultimate
$99
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Agile Hive - SAFe in JiraGitLab
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Agile Hive - SAFe in JiraGitLab
Features
Agile Hive - SAFe in JiraGitLab
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Agile Hive - SAFe in Jira
7.8
1 Ratings
3% above category average
GitLab
-
Ratings
Task Management7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Resource Management8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Gantt Charts7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Visual planning tools8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Agile Development
Comparison of Agile Development features of Product A and Product B
Agile Hive - SAFe in Jira
10.0
1 Ratings
20% above category average
GitLab
-
Ratings
Velocity Calculation10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Dependencies and Blockers10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Version Control Software Features
Comparison of Version Control Software Features features of Product A and Product B
Agile Hive - SAFe in Jira
-
Ratings
GitLab
8.6
26 Ratings
4% above category average
Branching and Merging00 Ratings8.625 Ratings
Version History00 Ratings9.026 Ratings
Version Control Collaboration Tools00 Ratings8.224 Ratings
Pull Requests00 Ratings8.925 Ratings
Code Review Tools00 Ratings8.525 Ratings
Project Access Control00 Ratings9.026 Ratings
Automated Testing Integration00 Ratings7.924 Ratings
Issue Tracking Integration00 Ratings8.125 Ratings
Branch Protection00 Ratings9.223 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Agile Hive - SAFe in JiraGitLab
Small Businesses
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.6 out of 10
Git
Git
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Planview AgilePlace
Planview AgilePlace
Score 9.2 out of 10
Git
Git
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Planview AgilePlace
Planview AgilePlace
Score 9.2 out of 10
Perforce Helix Core
Perforce Helix Core
Score 6.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Agile Hive - SAFe in JiraGitLab
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(4 ratings)
8.6
(144 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.9
(4 ratings)
Usability
7.0
(1 ratings)
9.0
(5 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(11 ratings)
User Testimonials
Agile Hive - SAFe in JiraGitLab
Likelihood to Recommend
//SEIBERT/MEDIA
Agile Hive is used for our value train
within a SAFe setup. Every quarter we organize a so-called Product Increment
(PI) Planning, where we plan all Features and Enablers in Agile Hive.
Based on the priority of the Product Manager all teams plan their Features and
Enablers accordingly to the sprints that are determined by the Release Train
Engineer and set up in Agile Hive. The teams then create User Stories and
estimate them and based on their sprint velocity (defined in Agile Hive)
Product Owners can see how many Features and Enablers are realistic in one
quarter (Product Increment). Further, dependencies across teams can be defined
and made visible in Agile Hive, so that the plan is feasible. Without Agile
Hive it would be hard or impossible to plan across several teams within a value
train and to manage all dependencies. Additionally, with Agile Hive the plan is
more realistic, so what can be achieved within one quarter in product
development.
Read full review
GitLab
GitLab is good if you work a lot with code and do complex repository actions. It gives you a very good overview of what were the states of your branches and the files in them at different stages in time. It's also way easier and more efficient to write pipelines for CI\CD. It's easier to read and it's easier to write them. It takes fewer clicks to achieve the same things with GitLab than it does for competitor products.
Read full review
Pros
//SEIBERT/MEDIA
  • Roadmapping in terms of defining epics and planning them across a timeline and across teams.
  • Showing dependencies within teams and across teams and over time horizon.
  • Create transparency throughout the product organization and teams about what is planned.
Read full review
GitLab
  • GitLab excels in managing code versions, allowing easy tracking of changes, branch management, and merging contributions.
  • It helps maintain code stability and reliability, saving time and effort in the development or research workflow.
  • Powerful code review features, enabling collaboration and feedback among team members.
  • Robust project management features, including issue tracking, kanban boards, and milestones.
Read full review
Cons
//SEIBERT/MEDIA
  • I believe the training and support could be more hands on and easier.
  • The Agile Hive - SAFe in Jira product can be a bit robust to understand.
  • Having Knowledge transfer videos can help more than documentations.
Read full review
GitLab
  • CI variables management is sometimes hard to use, for example, with File type variables. The scope of each variable is also hard to guess.
  • Access Token: there are too many types (Personal, Project, global..), and it is hard to identify the scope and where it comes from once created.
  • Runners: auto-scaled runners are for the moment hard to put in place, and monitoring is not easy.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
//SEIBERT/MEDIA
No answers on this topic
GitLab
Gitlab is the best in its segment. They have a free version, they have open-source software, they provide a good service with their SaaS product, they are a fully-remote company since the beginning (which means they are fully distributed and have forward-thinking IMO). I would certainly recommend them to everyone.
Read full review
Usability
//SEIBERT/MEDIA
It has in general a good usability, but there are some downsides, the big picture view of the entire product increment is too static, so there is no zoom in or zoom out. Mostly throughout planning it is necessary to zoom in to a sprint level and manage the user stories there. Also, the pig picture view has some limitations, because you cannot read the entire user story name (boxes are too small).
Read full review
GitLab
I find it easy to use, I haven't had to do the integration work, so that's why it is a 9/10, cause I can't speak to how easy that part was or the initial set up, but day to day use is great!
Read full review
Support Rating
//SEIBERT/MEDIA
No answers on this topic
GitLab
At this point, I do not have much experience with Gitlab support as I have never had to engage them. They have documentation that is helpful, not quite as extensive as other documentation, but helpful nonetheless. They also seem to be relatively responsive on social media platforms (twitter) and really thrived when GitHub was acquired by Microsoft
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
//SEIBERT/MEDIA
With Jira Software alone it is also possible to plan a SAFe product increment planning, but it would be nearly impossible to see the overall big picture of all product teams involved in a release train. So, the planning on sprint level for one team would be more efficient, but the planning for a whole quarter with all dependencies across teams would be not feasible to present. Therefore, Agile SAFe enables value trains an efficient way to plan a product increment.
Read full review
GitLab
Gitlab seems more cutting-edge than GitHub; however, its AI tools are not yet as mature as those of CoPilot. It feels like the next-generation product, so as we selected a tool for our startup, we decided to invest in the disruptor in the space. While there are fewer out-of-the-box templates for Gitlab, we have never discovered a lack of feature parity.
Read full review
Return on Investment
//SEIBERT/MEDIA
  • More transparency.
  • Better product decisions.
  • Saving time and resources.
  • Less critical dependencies.
Read full review
GitLab
  • GitLab cut down our spent on container, package and infrastructure registry
  • Best thing is we can now have everything in single platform which cost effective too
  • Quality of support is really good and they do have emergency support team as well which is great
Read full review
ScreenShots

GitLab Screenshots

Screenshot of GitLab, a comprehensive DevSecOps platform.Screenshot of Security DashboardScreenshot of Merge Request