What users are saying about
81 Ratings
Top Rated
657 Ratings
81 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener noreferrer'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 7.9 out of 100
Top Rated
657 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener noreferrer'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 7.9 out of 100

Likelihood to Recommend

Apache Hive

Apache Hive shines for ad-hoc analysis and plugging into BI tools. Its SQL-like syntax allows for ease of use not for only for engineers but also for data analysts. Through our experience, there are probably more desirable tools to use if you are planning on integrating Hive into your processing pipeline.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Microsoft Access

Microsoft Access is a decent and productive data access and analysis tool and can be well suited for small to medium sized organization. It can manage normal databases very effectively and generate business value reports for the enterprises. It is not an ideal option for the organizations with larger databases.
Dong Tsai | TrustRadius Reviewer

Pros

Apache Hive

  • Hive syntax is almost like SQL, so for someone already familiar with SQL it takes almost no effort to pick up Hive.
  • To be able to run map reduce jobs using json parsing and generate dynamic partitions in parquet file format.
  • Simplifies your experience with Hadoop especially for non-technical/coding partners.
Bharadwaj (Brad) Chivukula | TrustRadius Reviewer

Microsoft Access

  • One good aspect of Microsoft Access is how the software can be customized for different applications. This is very useful because we are able to use this software for multiple applications, which makes it cost-friendly.
  • Another strong point of Microsoft Access is the skill required to customize, the amount of programming required is less than most other database programs. This is good for a beginner looking to get into database management.
  • Microsoft Access is one of the more cost-friendly database applications, and most of the time it comes with Microsoft Office. Other database programs can be expensive and not as easy to use.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Cons

Apache Hive

  • Use Hive for analytical work loads. Write once and read many scenarios. Do not prefer updates and deletes.
  • Behind scenes Hive creates map reduce jobs. Hive performance is slow compared to Apache Spark.
  • Map reduce writes the intermediate outputs to dial whereas Spark operates in in-memory and uses DAG.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Microsoft Access

  • Well, it requires a lot more training or research than other more "intuitive" Microsoft products.
  • The buildout of custom reports is highly complex, and I think that area, in particular, could be more intuitive.
  • Queries can be difficult to develop if you don't know the right language or terminology, and I think that those terms could be better visible in the ribbon.
Che Odom | TrustRadius Reviewer

Likelihood to Renew

Apache Hive

Apache Hive 10.0
Based on 1 answer
Since I do not know the second data warehouse solution that integrate with HDFS as well as Hive.
Yinghua Hu | TrustRadius Reviewer

Microsoft Access

Microsoft Access 10.0
Based on 16 answers
I and the rest of my team will renew our Microsoft Access in the future because we use and maintain many different applications and databases created using Microsoft Access so we will need to maintain them in the future. Additionally, it is a standard at our place of work so it is at $0 cost to us to use. Another reason for renewing Microsoft Access is that we just don' t have the resources needed to extend into a network of users so we need to remain a single-desktop application at this time.
Alyssa Moy, MBA, PMP | TrustRadius Reviewer

Usability

Apache Hive

Apache Hive 8.5
Based on 9 answers
Thanks to its high usability Apache Hive enables users to craft extensive queries really efficiently and at the same time to how to hold response times very low. HiveQL simplicity makes it super easy to manage large datasets, what was almost an impossible task before introduction of Apache Hive data warehousing platform in our company.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Microsoft Access

Microsoft Access 10.0
Based on 4 answers
Microsoft Access is easy to use. It is compatible with spreadsheets. It is a very good data management tool. There is scope to save a large amount of data in one place. For using this database, one does not need much training, can be shared among multiple users. This database has to sort and filtering features which seem to be very useful.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Reliability and Availability

Apache Hive

No score
No answers yet
No answers on this topic

Microsoft Access

Microsoft Access 8.0
Based on 1 answer
I don't think the program has ever failed me. It is one of those programs where there is always a solution if you know where to look.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Support Rating

Apache Hive

Apache Hive 7.1
Based on 8 answers
Hive also has a community platform of its own just like other Hadoop frameworks. Most of the queries/problems are resolved in the community itself. We can just post our problems or get in touch with a specific user and get the issue resolved. Otherwise there is always the product support team for any resolution.
Partha Protim Pegu | TrustRadius Reviewer

Microsoft Access

Microsoft Access 6.5
Based on 7 answers
While I have never contacted Microsoft directly for product support, for some reason there's a real prejudice against MS Access among most IT support professionals. They are usually discouraging when it comes to using MS Access. Most of this is due to their lack of understanding of MS Access and how it can improve one's productivity. If Microsoft invested more resources towards enhancing and promoting the use of MS Access then maybe things would be different.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Implementation Rating

Apache Hive

No score
No answers yet
No answers on this topic

Microsoft Access

Microsoft Access 10.0
Based on 1 answer
there is no key idea, since it is easy to implement Microsoft Access
Thairy Ollarves | TrustRadius Reviewer

Alternatives Considered

Apache Hive

Besides Hive, I have used Google BigQuery, which is costly but have very high computation speed.Amazon Redshift is the another product, I used in my recent organisation.Both Redshift and BigQuery are managed solution whereas Hive needs to be managed
Manjeet Singh | TrustRadius Reviewer

Microsoft Access

FileMaker Pro focuses more on data collection in a single, flat file while Access allows for relationships to be drawn between data tables the reduces duplication. I have not worked with FileMaker Pro for several years but found it to be very unwieldy for my needs which were mostly relational.
Scott Herring | TrustRadius Reviewer

Return on Investment

Apache Hive

  • It exposes the distributed calculation world (Hadoop) to the users but doesn't require the user to have the in-depth understanding of boilerplate details, it reduces the time of learning and let the data analyst can focus their efforts on the core business.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Microsoft Access

  • Access runs many business processes. They mainly begin with a manual process that someone developed on their desktop with MS Access. As the process matures, is refined and becomes a dependency, it is then moved away from Access onto more enterprise-grade software.
  • Access helps us provide quick ad-hoc reporting to management without an expensive Business Intelligence license.
  • For number crunchers, Access is a must-have.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Pricing Details

Apache Hive

General

Free Trial
Free/Freemium Version
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Entry-level set up fee?
No

Apache Hive Editions & Modules

Additional Pricing Details

Microsoft Access

General

Free Trial
Free/Freemium Version
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Entry-level set up fee?
No

Microsoft Access Editions & Modules

Edition
Microsoft Access139.991
  1. per PC
Additional Pricing Details

Add comparison