Asana is a web and mobile project management app. With tasks, projects, conversations, and dashboards, Asana lets an entire team know who's doing what by when, enabling workload balancing. Users can also add integrations for GANTT charts, time tracking and more.
$50
per month
monday.com
Score 8.5 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
monday.com Work OS is an open platform designed so that anyone can create the tools they need to run all aspects of their work. It includes ready-made templates or the ability to customize any work solution ranging from sales pipelines to marketing campaigns, CRMs, and project tracking.
$36
per month (3 seats)
Wrike
Score 8.2 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Wrike is a project management and collaboration software. This solution connects tasks, discussions, and emails to the user’s project plan. Wrike is optimized for agile workflows and aims to help resolve data silos, poor visibility into work status, and missed deadlines and project failures.
$10
per month per user
Pricing
Asana
monday.com
Wrike
Editions & Modules
Premium
$13.49
per month
Business
$30.49
per month
Basic
$12
per month per user
Standard
$14
per month per user
Pro
$24
per month per user
Enterprise
Contact Sales
Contact us
Wrike Free
$0
per month per user
Wrike Team
$10
per month per user
Wrike Business
$24.8
per month per user
Wrike Enterprise
Request a quote
per month per user
Pinnacle
Request a quote
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Asana
monday.com
Wrike
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
Yes
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
Yes
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
$10 per user per month
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
Yearly plan: Save 18%
Monthly plan also available
Every premium plan begins with a 14-day trial period.
Asana is simpler and easier to manage than Teamwork Projects and Wrike for smaller teams, but still offers more features than Basecamp and requires a lot less customization than monday.com.
Personally, I didn't have a say in this as I had not started at the company when the team decided on Asana. That said, I have used monday.com, and we also have JIRA, which is used by our dev team, and us occasionally if we need to. JIRA has too many bells and whistles and is …
Wrike is similar but JUST a bit more cumbersome in every way. So if something takes 1-2 clicks in Asana it will take 3-4 in Wrike. Just enough of a lift that it makes it hard for people to just get started working. Instead, you must change your employees to think the way …
I used Wrike a few years ago. It was just okey, less configurable, harder to navigate than Asana. Maybe they improved their user experience over the years. I have also used Jira Software (not being on a development team) to structure projects and work sprints. This tool was …
We selected ASANA based on the feature set, and ease of rollout. monday.com had very good workflow automation but we found that ASANA was quicker and easier for staff to build a task eco-system that worked for them.
Zoho Projects was a very strong contender but was much more …
Side by side with the other two Asana by far beats monday.com and is comparable and slightly better than ClickUp. Monday is completely browser-based and is hard to navigate and figure out how to set up. Asana and ClickUp are the exact opposite. Both are easy to set up and …
Verified User
Employee
Chose Asana
I prefer Asana's user interface over monday.com. Asana's app is also incredibly helpful and I am not sure if monday.com's app is as loaded with features as Asana's is.
Asana is a top-tier project management software that helps us organize and track projects from start to finish. It allows us to apply tasks/to-dos to multiple projects without duplication, divide complex projects into smaller tasks, and track project progress. It also helps us …
Verified User
Manager
Chose Asana
Some features are better; some are too much. Not huge differences.
I like how extensive the capabilities are for Asana. With other softwares it seems there are many things lacking. I feel like Asana is also a very user friendly platform and aesthetically pleasing which is important in a modern office. We have many young people entering our …
Asana does well at the assignment of tasks and task management, but it is not a resource planning tool. Other tools do better at resource planning and some principles of agile/scrum. It is simple and easy to use within the mobile application and on desktop, but it doesn't have …
We tried it as one my developers swore up and down how good it was at the startup... well it crashed in our office, since we didn't end up working the way they did. We are more of a dev ops company than a social media or open source
Asana hit our sweet spot of easy to try, appropriate pricing for our mid size non-profit team, flexibility, and features. Lots of other platforms have very similar features organized in other ways, but Asana made sense and was fun to work with right off the bat. there were …
Asana is more complex than other alternatives that we have used within the organization, but is great for organizations with upwards of 10 people inside a department
Asana has a better user experience and user interface than other project management software I have used. It is much easier to learn than the other products, and I have been able to customize its use in better ways than I have accomplished with others. Much more than a to-do …
Asana stack over its various major competitors as its costing is quite under budget. The support to user is 24 x 7 and call centers available. The mail reply within 24 hours. Apart from it its user community is quite big and helps in the system to grow. It is widely accepted in …
Asana is lightweight and relatively inexpensive. For our marketing and advertising team, it works great. For teams with stricter needs (development teams, product teams, and other scrum teams), looking at other options might be worthwhile.
Both software are very similar to each other, even in the economic factor, the reason we choose Asana over the others is because of its usability, the software is very easy to use which helps to get the most out of it, in addition to the integrations that provide Asana with …
Easier to use than JIRA. Assigning tasks and creating stories are easier. easier to view in Kanban compared to JIRA. Asana comparison is about the same. But more visibility with status of tasks than Asana. Interface is easier to use compared to Trello
Smartsheet does more than we needed it to do for our simple project management. JIRA is the same way. Asana and Trello are probably the closest comparisons for our needs. Both of these others are great, and I don't have any real complaints to compare on any of these. Monday.com …
We were evaluating monday.com and Wrike at the same time, and ended up going with Wrike because we felt that the flexibility, integration options, and collaboration tools were much more user friendly and intuative compared to monday.com. The look and feel of monday.com felt …
Monday.com's layout is closer to a spreadsheet, and has better features to categorize and search data. I can go deeper, adding more and more insight to a task, than I could with a card, even when I used premium add-ons. I couldn't get a good grasp on what was going on with Asana…
I think monday.com is a more complete tool than Asana or Trello. It has many more features and help for many other things, such as integrations and automations.
I didn't select monday.com. The company where I work did it and I don't really know why.
monday.com seems to solve the issues and concerns for our marketing and graphics needs. I personally use Asana for my projects and tracking purposes and monday.com for my interations with Marketing and their needs.
I would say this is one of my least favorite applications. I don't find it super user friendly due to the extreme amounts of customization. It feels like my information is in there somewhere, but I can never find it easily. I think that it looks a lot prettier than Asana which …
When I arrived at my org, I was initially disappointed to hear that we used something other than Asana for project management. Fast forward just a few months, and I became a complete monday.com convert. While its organization is similar to Asana's, it's user interface, …
As a developer, I have utilized the mentioned apps to integrate processes for clients, and I have found monday.com to be superior due to its abundance of features compared to others. Choosing monday.com provides enough capabilities for teams and managers to handle work in one …
I also use the other selected. But I prefer monday.com because it is more clear (visually and intuitively), and also because I have been using it for longer than the others. However, there is the price factor that must be taken into consideration
monday.com has the only interface that is 100% customizable, can use public and private boards, can be shared with customers, produce Gantt charts, and has THE MOST integrations "in house". The professional relationships that monday.com has established to be "on board" with …
I'd put monday.com and Asana on par, then ClickUp and lastly Jira. Jira would be more appropriate for exclusively technology engineering teams. Jotform offers better choices for forms use cases especially ones with complexity. Zoho makes more sense when you have the full suite, …
Is far away the best!! With monday.com I find everything I need easily. As I said before, its user-friendly interface, which is intuitive and easy to navigate.
Although monday.com costs more than the other services, it can handle more as a platform. The functions, features, integrations, and automations allow you to do so much more than, than just keeping track of project & task deadlines.
Monday.com is much easier to use and isn't as complex. We didn't need a complex project management tool for what we are using it for, and monday.com is perfect for that.
Monday is much easier to use and learn. So far everyone has figured it out just by using it or after watching a brief training video. Most other tools have parts that we wouldn't use or be just too complicated for the average user. We feel with Mondayulse we are not struggling …
Basecamp has some very nice project management features but Monday.com really focuses on task management and keeping teams accountable/organized. We fell in love with the visual task boards that Monday.com offers and that's why we chose to go with it. We also really enjoyed …
We have tried many other project management programs. In the end, we were able to customize Monday more easily to fit our team's needs and handle more things in Monday than the others. It's nice to have everything in one place (campaign planning, team task lists, upcoming …
Candidly, we still use both as monday.com and Smartsheet, as monday.com only recently added dependencies, and that was integral to our proposal and pricing process.
Monday.com has a lot of functionality and visibility that the other tech we've used did not. the notifications and ease of adding new tasks and projects are also better than the other tech we have used.
monday.com includes the basic features from most project management apps: task management, collaboration, boards, messaging and so on. Also, the app excels in making multiple technical tools available in a single app, like Gantt, Kanban, and task management. Where you cannot …
I selected Wrike to keep a log of the work that I do. The organization that I work for recently adopted Asana. I am learning to use Asana to interact with other staff members, but I will continue to use Wrike for my work logs.
We had only evaluated Monday and Asana on a surface level before we chose Wrike, so never went to try a trial, but from what we saw in terms of functionality and customizability they both didn't seem to match up with our varied needs as a very diverse company dealing with …
I’ve used and evaluated Asana, monday.com, and Runrun.it before settling on Wrike, and here’s why I chose Wrike. While Asana and monday.com are great for simple task management and visually appealing interfaces, I found them lacking the depth of customization and scalability …
Asana is easier to use compared to Wrike having a steeper learning curve. However, be not afraid, you will be getting that value in a couple of months.
Verified User
Project Manager
Chose Wrike
We previously used monday.com. As a smaller company Monday was great but once we started to grow, we needed more ability to communicate and track our tasks.
We selected Wrike many years ago and have stayed with it. I've used Monday for some projects with other teams and it does a nice job. However, I cannot say that I can adequately compare the two platforms because I haven't done a deep dive on monday.com to know all its features …
ClickUp does have nice features, and Asana used to be a much better interface. Frankly, Wrike can be a bit of a beast to administrate and setup more intricate pieces. The learning curve is steeper than something like ClickUp; but, it is cost effective and simply takes time to …
I was not a part of the decision to choose Wrike over Asana. I know we reevaluate this decision every year. Asana has a much more attractive price point for what we need and is very competitive in that way against Wrike. I think we continue to use Wrike because we do not have …
monday.com is useful for other project management needs. However, we've found that Wrike is best for creative project management and cross-collaborative initiatives. Our project management team believes it's also the best platform for resource management and the ability to see …
Wrike is one of my favorite tools I've used so far because although it has vast reporting capabilities, I also find the interface to be pretty user friendly.
As I said before, the comparison of between versions of file uploaded is really a good feature of Wrike that I havent' experience yet with other Task Management systems that I have used. Aside from that, it's easier for me to collaborations between task laid out in Wrike rather …
Wrike goes much deeper and has much more enterprise use. I found the other tools to be quite simple, which could be great for smaller operations but wouldn't be able to scale to a larger organization like ours.
Wrike has better customization and integrations Flexibility to give different access depending on what it is needed. Spaces provide independence for each Team to set up what they need Open to feedback from users and implementing changes suggested by users Learning material …
Verified User
Project Manager
Chose Wrike
Wrike has more features than most of the competitors we evaluated, and is a much more flexible tool in terms of being able to mold to any use case. The UI of Wrike is clean and easy to look at and navigate, and it allows each team and each user to customize their experience and …
Verified User
Director
Chose Wrike
My company already had selected Wrike before I joined. From my experience, it's easier on the eyes, better CX, customisation and automatisation.
Verified User
Manager
Chose Wrike
Wrike sales team was down to earth, and very facilitative with our disparate set of requirements. They had additional security features as well as solid user stories. In the end all of our PMO offices voted and Wrike came out on top. With a large company any switch of project …
Verified User
Director
Chose Wrike
Wrike offered good ease of use while also providing top-tier Gantt chart
management. Wrike stood out with the design of their form submission, which enables conditional branching with custom fields and organization. Wrike also proved easier to create and manage tasks across …
I think the ease of use and cross collaboration is really useful here against other platforms. Also one of the biggest differences is actually really helpful how the app stores files and images which makes them useful to look for previous images (especially when you upload a …
Considering my team's needs, Wrike is a comprehensive project management solution offering features like task management, time tracking, and collaboration tools alongside advanced capabilities such as Gantt charts and resource management. From my point of view, Notion and Trello…