TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Azure App Service

    Score8.2 out of 10
    N/AThe Microsoft Azure App Service is a PaaS that enables users to build, deploy, and scale web apps and APIs, a fully managed service with built-in infrastructure maintenance, security patching, and scaling. Includes Azure Web Apps, Azure Mobile Apps, Azure API Apps, allowing developers to use popular frameworks including .NET, .NET Core, Java, Node.js, Python, PHP, and Ruby.

    $9.49

    per month

    Azure Container Apps

    Score5.7 out of 10
    N/AAzure Container Apps, part of the Azure suite of products from Microsoft, is a service used to deploy containerized apps without managing complex infrastructure. Users can write code using a preferred programming language or framework, and build microservices with full support for Distributed Application Runtime (Dapr). Scale dynamically based on HTTP traffic or events powered by Kubernetes Event-Driven Autoscaling (KEDA).N/A
    Pricing
    Azure App ServiceAzure Container Apps
    Editions & Modules
    Shared Environment for dev/test
    $9.49
    per month
    Basic Dedicated environment for dev/test
    $54.75
    per month
    Standard Run production workloads
    $73
    per month
    Premium Enhanced performance and scale
    $146
    per month
    vCPU (seconds)
    active usage $0.000024 and idle usage $0.000003
    per second 180,000 vCPU-seconds free grant per month
    Memory (GiB-Seconds)
    active usage $0.000003 and idle usage $0.000003
    per second 360,000 GiB-seconds free grant per month
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Azure App ServiceAzure Container Apps
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsFree and Shared (preview) plans are ideal for testing applications in a managed Azure environment. Basic, Standard and Premium plans are for production workloads and run on dedicated Virtual Machine instances. Each instance can support multiple applications and domains.
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Azure App ServiceAzure Container Apps
    Considered Both Products
    Microsoft
    No answer on this topic
    Microsoft
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    82%
    Would buy again
    9 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    91%
    Delivers good value for the price
    10 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    91%
    Happy with the feature set
    10 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    89%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    8 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    91%
    Implementation went as expected
    10 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    Azure App ServiceAzure Container Apps
    Platform-as-a-Service
    Comparison of Platform-as-a-Service features of Azure App Service and Azure Container Apps
    Feature
    Azure App Service
    6.2
    7 Ratings
    22% below category average
    Azure Container Apps
    5.3
    2 Ratings
    37% below category average
    Ease of building user interfaces7.37 Ratings5.82 Ratings
    Scalability6.97 Ratings7.82 Ratings
    Platform management overhead7.37 Ratings6.02 Ratings
    Workflow engine capability6.35 Ratings5.82 Ratings
    Platform access control7.46 Ratings4.42 Ratings
    Services-enabled integration5.86 Ratings4.82 Ratings
    Development environment creation6.27 Ratings4.22 Ratings
    Development environment replication5.96 Ratings4.02 Ratings
    Issue monitoring and notification6.27 Ratings5.62 Ratings
    Issue recovery4.26 Ratings4.02 Ratings
    Upgrades and platform fixes4.76 Ratings5.82 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Azure App ServiceAzure Container Apps
    Small Businesses
    IBM Cloud Foundry
    Score8.5 out of 10
    IBM Cloud Foundry
    Score8.5 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    IBM Cloud Private
    Score9.6 out of 10
    IBM Cloud Private
    Score9.6 out of 10
    Enterprises
    AWS Elastic Beanstalk
    Score8.6 out of 10
    AWS Elastic Beanstalk
    Score8.6 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Azure App ServiceAzure Container Apps
    Likelihood to Recommend
    6.9
    (11 ratings)
    6.6
    (2 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    2.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    6.5
    (3 ratings)
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    10.0
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Azure App ServiceAzure Container Apps
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Microsoft
    You may easily deploy your apps to Azure App Service if they were written in Visual Studio IDE (typically.NET applications). With a few clicks of the mouse, you may already deploy your application to a remote server using the Visual Studio IDE. As a result of the portal's bulk and complexity, I propose Heroku for less-experienced developers.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    Azure Container Apps is a welcome addition for sure. Based on my experience, this has enabled us to move fully to the cloud and managed everywhere in one spot and on the go. We can scale it to our end as much as we would like. It can be assess anywhere and it is fully secure
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Microsoft
    • Extremely easy to deploy and update from Visual Studio
    • It integrates seamlessly with other Azure PaaS resources
    • It has an in-depth integration with AppInsights, so you can understand errors and their root cause easily.
    • Easy to create and delete, what is not the same case in a IaaS resource
    • It escalates based on CPU workload and some other resource variables.
    • Configuration changes are almost immediate
    • Offers an excellent abstraction from hardware backend of the platform
    • That's updated very often, saving time and the risk of a self-performed update over a IaaS
    • That's really easy to develop for Web Apps
    • It supports Function Apps and Web Apps into the same "cost black box"
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • Gives user a level of autonomous access
    • No control plane or node pool to manage
    • Less kubernetes experience required
    • Easily integrate with Azure devops
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Microsoft
    • Jumps between resource sizes can get expensive
    • You may wind up putting a lot of eggs in one basket--not necessarily a con but something to keep in mind (most of your data will likely be managed and processed through Microsoft products/services if you fully commit to Azure App Service).
    • Learning new technology. If you're moving from on-premises to Azure App Service (or any cloud solutions), you'll likely have to rethink how things are done to achieve the same end results (and/or resources may become expensive quickly).
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • Continue to enhance security
    • Better pricing
    • Flexibility
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft
    I would rather use AKS for my critical applications. The fact that the deployment process is dependent on as cli makes it hard for us to integrate with our standard CI/CD tools
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Microsoft
    I have given this rating because Azure App Service performs very well in terms of speed, reliability, and reducing overhead, and improves overall team productivity, with a little scope for improvement in complex testing scenarios and configurations, scalability concerns in a large setup, and similar tracking and audit needs.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    Azure Container Apps are fantastic and it is a game changer. I would recommend it to anyone considering it. As you can scale it to what you would like and it is fully cloud native with better security. It is a no brainier not to consider it. I do believe that with further improve it will become even more attractive
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Microsoft
    Microsoft has always been known for providing a high standard in terms of customer support and Azure App Service (and as a matter of fact the whole Azure Platform) is no exception. Azure App Service never caused us any issues and we only contacted their customer support for questions regarding server locations and pricing. I feel pretty satisfied with how they treat their customers.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Microsoft
    When we chose it, we did so because of its integration with Microsoft applications; now we need to integrate with AI, and Azure doesn't offer a good integration. That is the main reason to change it. It is still great to develop Windows- and Microsoft-based applications, but if we need to integrate with AI, Google wins by far.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Microsoft
    • Deployment of ASP.NET apps at the organization has been sped up.
    • An option to offer access to the version control system on a third platform so that we could easily deploy our apps.
    • Because of Azure App Service's scalability capabilities, the costs of running the services are kept to a minimum. As a result, we may save hundreds of dollars each month compared to the expenses of traditional servers by using fewer resources during slack periods.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • As it is cloud native, we no longer required to have onsite prem
    • Reducing both from an energy and security perspective
    • It is worth the investment as we have saved about 10% of our ICT cost
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots