BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management vs. Check Point Harmony Endpoint

It is an absolute must in all organizations where security is taken seriously. For organizations where there is a tendency among the users' end to abuse access privileges, this tool comes in handy. It has features that would enable the administrator to look through video logs to see what was done by a specific user. Also has the capability to terminate or lock users/ user sessions.

Incentivized

Check Point Endpoint Security is well suited for businesses where confidentiality must be maintained in order to mitigate risk and compromise of customer information

Incentivized

• Reporting capabilities for user activities, including complete session recordings
• Integration with SAML for SSO and secure LDAP authentication
• Jump point servers for central isolated access from outside the network

• Identifies ransomware
• Low resource usage
• Self remediation

Incentivized

• design
• user experience
• software functionality

Incentivized

• The prompts for one time logins are rather lengthy and it takes around five minutes to go through all of the authentication required. I believe this could be improved upon.

Incentivized

The product performed to the level of our requirements.

n/a as we skipped doing a compare

Incentivized

I found that Check Point identified more Ransomware attacks than Kaspersky.

Incentivized

• Difficult set up
• Difficult GUI
• Hard to understand in the beginning

Incentivized

• It has enabled us to maintain privacy which has enhanced our highly rated brand standard. While basically it is a team member specific, behind the scenes program that protects systems from being used by unauthorized individuals, it contributes to the overall integrity of the organization which results in increased market share and return on investment for shareholders.

Incentivized