BILL is an online service for SMBs which provides a central dashboard for managing Accounts Receivable, Accounts Payable, and cash flow management. It syncs with all major accounting systems like QuickBooks, Sage, Intaact, and NetSuite.
$45
per month
Sage Intacct
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
Sage Intacct is a cloud ERP system targeted at high-growth small and medium-sized businesses. Intacct includes applications for core financials and accounting, purchasing, order management, and financial reporting and business intelligence. It also integrates with 3rd party software like Salesforce.
N/A
QuickBooks Online
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
QuickBooks Online is a SaaS version of the QuickBooks product. It contains all of the features found in the local version. Higher-priced plans include greater automation, payment management, inventory and time tracking, and analytics features.
I know that QuickBooks Online has the option to directly pay vendors through its software, but I have found that using Bill.com is the best for paying your bills. The biggest difference is Bill.com has the approval requirement before any bill can be paid and you can require …
Bill does not stack well against it competitors. I believe Sage Intacct Accounts Payable or Purchasing Module would be a lot better used for all Accounts Payable needs. I also believe AvidXchange and Concur would come into a close second due to the fact that the publishers …
I was not involved in the selection process but we implemented Bill.com when the business started in 2013, so we have used it from the beginning. We use QuickBooks Online for our management company bookkeeping but we choose to process payments through Bill.com because it's more …
top solution out there to simplify accounting and finance tracking. Only negative note: they started charging for every single client ACH payment done through Quickbooks. Originally this feature was free, but then it grew to up to $10 per transaction. Reason for which we had to …
Verified User
Employee
Chose BILL
In my last job, we used Clients and Profits (which isn't listed as a product). We switched from it to NetSuite and I believe used Epay to print checks from CSV import files generated from NetSuite. Bill.com seems way easier and streamlined.
I have not come across another solution as complete as Bill.com. I have looked at Concur, Quickbooks bill payments, bank payment systems and even more advanced systems like Intacct or Oracle, but none of then provides the features and benefits of Bill.com.
Bill.com was something my employer uses in the US. But it certainly doesn't work here in Canada [in my experience]. Paypal is easy to retrieve payments from and Quickbooks is almost seamless. The sign-in process through the Bill.com App is ridiculous [in my opinion] and …
Verified User
Employee
Chose BILL
We used to use microsoft GP and microsoft access to process our invoices. But Bill.com is much more effective and user friendly than the others.
It's more flexible and affordable than Expensify and QB online. It allows a more novice user to understand and manage the backend of the platform. It costs less for growing companies since you don't have to sign a long contract. Its similar in flexibility of payments to PayPal …
Bill.com's strongest characteristic is that it integrates seamlessly with our GL system. Of the systems that I have used, Bill.com has required the least amount of mental energy ensuring that everything is being processed correctly and that all payments/transactions integrate …
Bill.com had just been implemented when I joined the company where I first used it. I never saw a need to look at anything else. In my current role, I turned to Bill.com again and had it up and running within a few hours.
We replaced QuickBooks Online with Intacct. The main drivers were multi-entity, reporting and controls. We evaluated Netsuite at the time and they were largely comparable from a feature standpoint. Intacct won out in the end in that they seemed to understand out business …
The big advantage of Sage Intacct is that it maintains the "usability" of QuickBooks Online, but the multi-entity functionality of Sage is incredible. It does everything that we used to like about Quickbooks, but the additional features and capabilities better serve our needs …
I have used all these software. as discussed earlier Sage Intacct helps us in Inventory management. which is not good in our previous accounting software so we moved to Sage Intacct from that one. Some of the above mentioned software is not good for large scale businesses. I …
Sage Intacct has most of the best features but doesn't have things integrated that I don't need/use. It's very module based so you can add/remove modules as you need to. It's very scalable as well so as I add entities, there's not an incremental software cost like there would …
For starters, ease of access works so much better in Intacct. Additionally, the availability of options for entering information into the software far exceeds what we've seen in other software, enabling more accurate reporting. The audit history also helps a ton when we're …
I have used them in different ways and like both for accounting specifics.
Verified User
Employee
Chose Sage Intacct
Sage 50 and QuickBooks are "smaller systems," whereas Intacct has the potential for system integrations, reporting and dashboards beyond what we've had in the past.
Intacct is significantly easier to use and more modern than Sage 300, and has a much higher "ceiling" than QuickBooks; you can just do a lot more things, and the system doesn't have the same training wheels that QuickBooks has at times. Being cloud-based and able to upload …
I only used QuickBooks to export historical transactions to then import into Sage Intacct but Sage Intacct seemed to be laid out better and the interface was cleaner and intuitive.
I think Sage's comparison with the listing system software has a better, friendlier interface that improves the user experience. The support videos are also a plus, as they are not offered by all other software, which makes it easy to train new hires of the company. This saves …
I think that Sage Intacct is quicker, more robust, and easier to work in. While I think that most accounting systems offer the same functions, and can be figured out, I did find Intacct to be more intuitive. I also find it is easy to troubleshoot issues in the system. I can …
Sage 50 has a legacy interface but seems to be more robust than quickbooks. However, Sage Intacct, while a steep learning curve, can be really dynamic if one approaches with an open mind. Quickbooks is great for small to mid size businesses, where as Sage Intacct is great for …
With a medium-sized company, Quickbooks wasn't robust or as customizable for our needs. Similarly, Sage 50 (Peachtree) was unable to handle dimensions and detailed reporting like Sage Intacct. We currently use Square POS, but record all financial data into Sage Intacct, which …
Sage Intacct is night and day over Microsofit Dynamics. The ease of use and efficiency is so much better with Sage Intacct. The conneciton options and reporting is as well. I would not recommend Microsoift Dynamics to anyone espcially after using Sage Intacct. I would most …
QuickBooks is too entry-level. We outgrew that product. NetSuite is a good product, but I have a history with the various Sage products. So, I have a bias for Sage. I'm not sure I can give an accurate comparison with NetSuite. I like Sage and the company.
We use Sage Intacct for all the other companies that we provide accounting and IT services for. It is fairly convenient because we can use a single log-on and book intercompany transactions. It has more functions and the layout is more sophisticated which in our case, is not …
Other software packages such as NetSuite and Intacct I used in the past are more robust in terms of supporting a bigger organization, but at my current company we selected QuickBooks Online as our ERP because it is a perfect fit for the size of the company and our operations as …
I think QuickBooks Online is better than Xero. However I think is is lower then NetSuite and Sage Intacct. The system isself is great because it's cloud based so it can be accessed readily. However, in my opinion, it's not built for companies that are growing or expect to grow. …
Sage Intacct is very difficult to use and the inter-face is decades behind QB online. The ease to which one can find and manage information on QB online versus Sage Intacct is remarkable. QB Online is made for people who actually manage and facilitate financial information. I …
QuickBooks Online is best for small and mid sized businesses needing simple affordable accounting. Its starting price is from $19. Xero is stronger for collaboration with unlimited users. Their cost starts with 15, and they are good for flexible reports. Netsuite is built for …
Verified User
Team Lead
Chose QuickBooks Online
Reporting is more diverse and ability to add multiple dimensions
FreshBooks is trying to do more bookkeeping and accounting, but QuickBooks Online greatly surpasses in terms of functionality and integrations. FreshBooks can easily manage invoices and very basic reporting.
Currently using Blackbaud Financial Edge (we're a nonprofit) and I miss the ease and flexibility of QuickBooks Online. I've considered switching (downgrading?) to QBO, although we have needs that are unique to nonprofits. Not sure QBO could handle fund accounting very well.
It is a platform that we consider to be mid-range. Where we are below cost and functionality relative to the more robust players like a SAP Business One, but still powerful enough for a medium or large size operation.
In addition to being one of the few global solutions that …
QuickBooks pales in comparison to netsuite. Netsuite is a fully functional cloud based ERP system that is a mid tier solution for companies that have outgrown small business solutions. It was intuitive and allowed for full cycle accounting, procurement processing with …
Quickbooks Online made more sense for our clients who had smaller businesses and required more hands-on accounting help. The ability to access this cloud-based accounting software from our office and respond to needs quickly was a huge benefit and advantage over Quickbooks …
Most of the systems I have used are larger accounting applications that are not as comparable to Quickbooks. As I have demoed another competitor, I keep coming back around to using Quickbooks Online because it is usually the cheapest option with the most useful information …
QBO is much more robust than the other free programs. There is so much more you can do with it compared to the other programs. I had zero accounting experience and I'd say the other programs were a bit easier to learn, but overall QuickBooks has more features and capabilities …
We liked the fresh approach and the clean aesthetics of Wave, Xero and ZipBooks. However they all lacked the ability to customize a invoice template, which is sad to say, but that was the #1 feature for us, since we had existing customers that we didn't want to disrupt; i.e., …
Quickbooks Online is just more refined. We use Bill.com as well, and the two integrate seamlessly. We chose QuickBooks Online because of the number of clients that are already familiar with the product, the number of clients likely to move in the direction of QuickBooks Online …
Features
BILL
Sage Intacct
QuickBooks Online
Payment Management
Comparison of Payment Management features of Product A and Product B
BILL
7.9
8 Ratings
6% above category average
Sage Intacct
-
Ratings
QuickBooks Online
-
Ratings
Customizable Approval Policies
8.16 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Financial Document Management
7.68 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Payment Status Tracking
8.28 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Payment Audit Trail
8.28 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Duplicate Bill Detection
8.26 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Advanced OCR
7.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Electronic Funds Transfer
7.67 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Accounts Payable
Comparison of Accounts Payable features of Product A and Product B
BILL
7.8
5 Ratings
11% above category average
Sage Intacct
-
Ratings
QuickBooks Online
-
Ratings
Automated Accounts Payable Processes
8.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Vendor Management
8.25 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Tax Form Preparation
6.82 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
BILL
-
Ratings
Sage Intacct
7.0
346 Ratings
8% below category average
QuickBooks Online
8.0
115 Ratings
6% above category average
Pay calculation
00 Ratings
7.05 Ratings
8.3105 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
00 Ratings
6.45 Ratings
7.456 Ratings
Direct deposit files
00 Ratings
7.14 Ratings
8.596 Ratings
Salary revision and increment management
00 Ratings
6.94 Ratings
8.269 Ratings
Reimbursement management
00 Ratings
7.7346 Ratings
7.976 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
BILL
-
Ratings
Sage Intacct
7.7
817 Ratings
2% above category average
QuickBooks Online
7.2
104 Ratings
5% below category average
API for custom integration
00 Ratings
7.9770 Ratings
7.286 Ratings
Plug-ins
00 Ratings
7.4619 Ratings
7.286 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
BILL
-
Ratings
Sage Intacct
8.7
1243 Ratings
6% above category average
QuickBooks Online
8.5
176 Ratings
4% above category average
Single sign-on capability
00 Ratings
8.81019 Ratings
8.6141 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
00 Ratings
8.61209 Ratings
8.4166 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
BILL
-
Ratings
Sage Intacct
7.9
1332 Ratings
1% above category average
QuickBooks Online
8.3
202 Ratings
6% above category average
Dashboards
00 Ratings
7.81198 Ratings
8.4189 Ratings
Standard reports
00 Ratings
8.11295 Ratings
8.6196 Ratings
Custom reports
00 Ratings
7.71279 Ratings
8.1180 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
BILL
-
Ratings
Sage Intacct
8.0
1464 Ratings
5% above category average
QuickBooks Online
7.9
219 Ratings
4% above category average
Accounts payable
00 Ratings
8.41358 Ratings
8.8185 Ratings
Accounts receivable
00 Ratings
8.21192 Ratings
8.8202 Ratings
Cash management
00 Ratings
8.11260 Ratings
8.1185 Ratings
Bank reconciliation
00 Ratings
8.11254 Ratings
9.0208 Ratings
Expense management
00 Ratings
8.0893 Ratings
8.4192 Ratings
Time tracking
00 Ratings
7.2483 Ratings
7.087 Ratings
Fixed asset management
00 Ratings
7.6647 Ratings
8.087 Ratings
Multi-currency support
00 Ratings
7.9491 Ratings
7.441 Ratings
Multi-division support
00 Ratings
8.5802 Ratings
7.370 Ratings
Regulations compliance
00 Ratings
7.6486 Ratings
7.870 Ratings
Electronic tax filing
00 Ratings
7.7359 Ratings
8.1105 Ratings
Self-service portal
00 Ratings
7.6607 Ratings
7.5115 Ratings
Global Financial Support
00 Ratings
8.0354 Ratings
6.933 Ratings
Intercompany Accounting
00 Ratings
8.5843 Ratings
7.963 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
00 Ratings
8.81167 Ratings
8.5132 Ratings
Enterprise Accounting
00 Ratings
8.1504 Ratings
7.051 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
00 Ratings
8.2681 Ratings
7.977 Ratings
Centralized Rules Framework
00 Ratings
7.9493 Ratings
7.651 Ratings
Standardized Processes
00 Ratings
8.3802 Ratings
8.896 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.062 Ratings
Localizations
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.847 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
BILL
-
Ratings
Sage Intacct
6.7
473 Ratings
9% below category average
QuickBooks Online
7.0
81 Ratings
5% below category average
Inventory tracking
00 Ratings
7.8350 Ratings
6.876 Ratings
Automatic reordering
00 Ratings
5.58 Ratings
7.142 Ratings
Location management
00 Ratings
8.5439 Ratings
7.447 Ratings
Manufacturing module
00 Ratings
5.25 Ratings
6.832 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
It depends, Bill.com certainly has a strong reputation and I agree it can be a great solution in the right scenario but I think the implementation and initial setup are critical and need to be well thought out based on the setup of the organization you are a part of.
Sage has been ideal for our organizations to scale while maintaining functionality. Importing has made growth and acquisitions within our company easy to onboard additional entities from other platforms. The automation features are high quality and necessary for high transaction frequency companies. The reporting is great for overall reviews of business however custom reports can be difficult to create for specific needs. A high amount of training and developer support is needed to get started, however once fully onboarded the workflows and automations do most of the work allowing you to take time to learn the intricacies
QBO is a great solution for small and midsize companies. If the goal is to record all transactions and pull reliable financial reports, QBO is a great option. QBO is also a great solution if most operations are run in a system like Ramp. It syncs well with systems like that and turns the data into something management can use to make decisions. QBO is great because so many people use it. It is easy to find training online, and many people have experience with it.
Custom, real-time financial reporting. I am able to streamline my reporting to pull in various account groups and calculations which save me time from having to do it in Excel.
Out of the box standard reports for clients who don't require as custom of reporting or even as a great starting point to build out reports.
Integrations with other platforms, such as Airbase, various banks, Rippling, etc.
The dashboard module is extremely helpful in my monthly review of various entities.
Workflows for accounts payable invoice review are terrific.
Bill payment allows you to pay vendors online via ACH or check without having to write a physical check, which reduces admin time.
The cloud based login lends well to a remote or hybrid work environment for staff.
QuickBooks Online allows you to pre-configure vendors' general ledger expense accounts. This helps with general ledger coding accuracy and consistency.
QuickBooks Online integrates with Rippling HRIS, Coast, Capital One, JPMorgan Chase, etc., which lends well to an efficient month-end closing and reduced administrative time.
Currently, our company uses a different platform to submit expenses, we only use bill.com to receive them. So perhaps this isn't actually a place where bill.com could improve, but the expense submission process may not have been robust enough for our company.
The bill.com platform wasn't the most beautiful or pleasing to use, but this is a minor fault.
I'd love a way to set up recurring payments (e.g., my phone bill is reimbursed each month).
I dislike that the online bill pay option through QuickBooks is required for their invoicing.
The auto-fill portion of the customer setup, specifically the company name, is listed, but it also auto-fills in the name portion, which is inconvenient and time-consuming to remove.
While our firm does not use Bill.com internally, we know many customers that use Bill.com and are very happy with it. Based on the feedback from current users, I would say that the product should have a strong renewal forecast. Once customers move their AP to the cloud, they would be unlikely to move it back given a choice.
Sage Intacct is continuously evolving and increasing it's functionalities. I am excited to attend conferences to learn what is in the roadmap for future releases. Additionally, using Sage Intacct allows me grow as a professional, I am really enjoy the knowledge that I have within the product to be able to share my experiences.
It like the product 'right out of the box' and I trust Intuit will continually improve it over the years based on my experience with their desktop products. The large providers of Apps makes customizing the entire package relatively easy and seamless for a wide variety of business types.
Bill.com continues to raise the bar with new features and improved interface. The Fast Pay option is another innovation that reduces administrative time when you have to get an overnight check out. The new Chat Support interface, powered by Zopim, which is world-class, adds to the responsiveness of Bill.com's support team and makes getting real-time answers that much easier.
The ease of use as a seasoned user is wonderful; however, new users struggle to adapt to the program efficiently. Better training videos--all in one location--would be beneficial. The use of a "sandbox" environment is a great tool for new employees or for the fiscal department to test certain journal entries or other transactions to verify accuracy of data.
Beyond being overkill for a small org's needs, QBO is constantly stealing screen real estate and attention by hammering users for account upgrades, connecting to one of their approved consultants or buying add-ons. The idea of using a simple configurable bookeeping and light accounting interface is completely missing. At the very least, we should be able to hide functions like inventory that we will never use.
The only time Bill.com was ever "unavailable" was then the Sync to Quickbooks function failed. That happened a time or two but was usually quickly remedied. I'm not sure if that's an issue with newer online versions of Quickbooks Enterprise -- at the time we were using a remotely hosted Quickbooks instance accessed via terminal server (vs a cloud offering like Bill.com is)
There has only been one occurrence where Sage Intacct was not available to me, however I had already been working a number of hours trying to get a project completed. It honestly allowed me to step back and take a much needed break.
As fas as integration is concerned I don't feel this slows Sage Intacct down at all. However, sometimes I do feel it takes some larger reports more time to load due to all the detail. As well as, I "move very fast" in my motions so sometimes I double click on fuctions too quickly and the system seems to think that I have a duplicate request.
I could not explain to them how I was trying to remove an old email account from my company page while granting the new email account access to the bank account that the first email account had added. The "set a bank account as inactive" button is labeled delete, but they don't seem to recognize that. I requested my Bill.com account be deleted on Wednesday so I could start all over with a fresh account; this seemed to be completed Wednesday night, but when I tried to create a new Bill.com account from the same email, it took me to my old bill.com account.
Only a few times have we had to reach out to support, and every time we did, we received a relatively quick response and a solution was found fairly quickly. Only once was there an issue that took longer than a week to resolve, but it still did eventually get solved.
In my experience, most representatives keep me on the phone for hours, literally, for a single issue and then usually cannot resolve it satisfactorily. I have 10 open cases that need resolution and, in my experience, there has been NO follow-up communication on any of them.
I have taken in person training classes at several of the annual Sage Intacct user conferences. It is very interactive and the trainers are very easy to follow and understand. They are great at getting everyone in the class involved. They also make sure everyone has learned to task before moving to a new one.
The online training provided by Bill.com is concise and since the firm consistently improves the platform functionality, users are able to select the training for the modules they specifically need.
The free training is very minimal. For what we pay for the service, I would like more training. We end up training new users in-house because the provided free training is not nearly comprehensive enough. That being said, the training provided, for the material covered, was adequate and relevant for the given topics.
I would not use a thrid party administrator to implement your system, especially if you are going to be modifying the system at all. Use Intacct implementors as they will be able to better support you on any issues that come up after you go live.
The person in charge of QB needs to be very accurate with record keeping and is recommended to stay on top of tasks. The biggest issue we have is reconciliation, and those issues occur only when too much time has occurred between reconciliations
1. Automation & Workflow Efficiency.2. Integration Capabilities with other softwaresWe needed a centralized, automated, and scalable solution for managing both payables and receivables. The strong integration with our existing accounting software was a key factor.The platform gave us better visibility and control over cash flow and approval processes.
Sage Intacct has most of the best features but doesn't have things integrated that I don't need/use. It's very module based so you can add/remove modules as you need to. It's very scalable as well so as I add entities, there's not an incremental software cost like there would be with QuickBooks and it's less expensive than Oracle.
As a freelance bookkeeper, the Desktop version of QuickBooks Online doesn't allow for ease of access from any device. Having to be on a computer with the software downloaded creates additional work to gain access to all required filings etc. Also, I personally find the linking functionality on the Online version to be much more streamlined and user friendly.
As we have grown along our professional path, we have also expanded our use of QB. The scalability is easy and features seem to be waiting for you until you need them. We have increased profits by over 10x from our first year in business to the current and have yet to find a reason to look elsewhere
After receiving an offer to 'finance' outstanding invoices, I was enticed by the promise of a 3% total cost for a 60-day period, with the possibility of extending the financing for an additional 10 months (for an additional fee). Eager to access funds, I decided to finance an invoice worth $17,160.00. Within 24 hours, BILL deposited $16,645.20 (97% of the invoice amount) into my account.
However, when the customer paid their $17,160 invoice four days later, instead of the funds being deposited into my checking account as I expected, BILL chose to retire the loan and retain my $514.80 fee for the 4 day advance period. This unexpected turn of events resulted in an effective interest rate of a staggering 273.75%. It was clear that this arrangement was far from what I had initially understood, and the financial impact was outrageously high.
Frustratingly, my attempts to resolve this issue through customer service were in vain, as I spoke with three agents who provided no satisfactory solutions. To anyone contemplating using BILL's services, I strongly urge you to carefully scrutinize the fine print and consider opting for a more reputable finance company."
Positive - It runs better than our old software when we all work together, rather than having to sign off on each other and deal with syncing issues.
Negative - It's not as easy to go back to fix an amount, a date, etc. Sometimes, a very small mistake needs to be corrected by voiding and redoing the entire transaction.
We can successfully sync other software we use with Intacct! It reduces workload when things are automated.
QuickBooks has given us a useful portal by which to get an overview of our financials.
QuickBooks has given us a relatively easy way to send out invoices quickly and efficiently.
Due to the customization limitations on QuickBooks, we've had to get creative in third-party implementations to better represent our brand and to track financials.