Likelihood to Recommend Although the tool was developed locally in South Korea, it is still a good tool and is already validated in a number of industries. The problem is, no one seems to know the future of the product. It is okay to use it as a pilot tool for any non-commercial purpose, but to be used in a professional or enterprise setting, maintenance, licensing, and other things need to be guaranteed by HandySoft.
Read full review Celonis is well suited especially for comparably big use cases due to hefty license costs. For thorough analyses, all departments should take part in the approach since there are a lot of hidden influences and effects from departments to one another. Use cases like conformance / revision are possible but will not be a big lever since this only involves checking single instances.
Read full review Pros BizFlow has a long history of development and implementation in a variety of industries. Its modeling tool is well-designed and user-friendly. BizFlow supports seamless integration with backend services like MySQL databases and web services. Since it is an enterprise-wide BPM tool, system performance was stable and robust. It supports modern m-health requirements, with social BPM functions and mobile support. Mobile integration especially was good, with the provider's secure messaging functions. Read full review Clear understanding on how the processes really run Excellent solution to support use cases like harmonization, process excellence, audit and compliance High performing methodology to build economic value addressing inefficiencies Perfect to convince clients showing objective evidences Make easy the enterprise collaboration Provide an E2E "movie" of the processes Able to ensure a centric model to connect all the core processes Top performances that save time of the analyst that can spend energy in his real work Excellent ETL, agnostic (able to extrapolate data from many DB) Strong capabilities of the data model Continuous innovation Solid platform to address projects of business process reengineering Read full review Cons It's not even clear that BizFlow is still managed by the company. It was a good tool before, but it looks like it's been fading out. Although this was an R&D project in an academic institute, business support was extremely poor. We had no idea how to resolve issues; there were no online communities, documentation, or anyone who knew this product. Few references in healthcare and clinical settings. We tried this for a proof-of-concept though, so it didn't matter. Read full review User interface is complex and so it can take some time for users who are new to process mining to become familiar with the tool Celonis is not able to integrate with all of Uniper's enterprise application due to lack of connectors No real-time collaboration with other users e.g. lack of shared annotations Read full review Likelihood to Renew We have been able to leverage Celonis [greatly] because of the commitment and support we receive from our data scientist. I strongly believe that we would not be able to accomplish this without her assistance. Moreover, when we escalate matters, the product development is engaged and commits resources to make sure our initiatives/business cases are supported.
Read full review Usability It is a great tool but also requires a lot of work to get it into a useable fashion. Part of this is on our end as we don't have the dedicated analyst function yet to really become self-sufficient with Celonis. It also uncovers a lot of data issues or at the very least, multiple rounds of development and data validation are required before getting to a position where the business users feel comfortable with the data being reflected. This is fairly normal with any data-related development effort and perhaps not unique to Celonis.
Read full review Support Rating We submit tickets to Celonis through product support. No assistance is generally provided, have to wait and the ticket is then escalated to product support in Germany. Many times we submit the ticket and the support desk asks us the same questions back where they should already have this information.
Read full review Implementation Rating Celonis has a lot of tools to support the implementation.
Read full review Alternatives Considered At the beginning of the project, we considered popular tools for the modeling and execution of business processes: jBPM, Activity, Tibco, etc. jBPM is the tool we liked because of its strong support of BPMN 2.0 and strong online community and support. We had different expectations for BizFlow, like professional and business supports. In the end, although haven't decided yet, most likely we will move forward with jBPM instead of BizFlow. Unless things change, the tool will fade out from the market silently.
Read full review The major reason to choose Celonis is that it has enhanced decision-making in filtering the candidates. The frontend designer has nice graphics and has well-designed self-service. I particularly enjoy the visual editor, which allows you to create complicated PQL without having to write any code, as well as the numerous filtering choices, including process mining options.
Read full review Return on Investment We ended up deciding to not use BizFlow for future projects. The main reason wasn't due to ROI or cost, but was due to our uncertainty of the management and future direction of the tool by the company. Besides the business issue, as far as reasonably priced software goes, it is a good tool. Adopting BizFlow into a healthcare industry may come with additional expense due to its lack of references in the industry, which should be additionally considered. Read full review Celonis thus far (and I do not anticipate anything changing) has not had a negative impact on our business. It has challenged us to think differently about what is possible and jumpstarted process improvement aimed at saving both money and time while improving the morale of our end users. Celonis has also provided us with enough data to be to develop targeted business objectives on system usage and timeliness which without them was nearly impossible to measure let alone act upon Better order processing (quicker, more system driven, and saves money) Reduction in throughput time (our order fulfillment time has improved and our order processing time has decreased) Finds and acts on automation opportunities Can find large dollar value opportunities for process improvement Can find data driven recommendations for executive interactions Read full review ScreenShots