Cisco Catalyst 8000 Edge Platforms

Cisco Catalyst 8000 Edge Platforms

Cisco Catalyst 8000 Edge Platforms

49 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Cisco Catalyst 8000 Edge Platforms	Score 9.4 out of 10	N/A	Catalyst 8000 Edge Platforms are singular devices providing enterprise, public sector, and service providers high-performance routing, security and network services. Catalyst offer ultra-fast encryption performance, greater tunneling capabilities, along with the latest in firmware defenses and public key infrastructure (PKI) management for secure connectivity to the cloud. Catalyst 8000 offer these capabilities in a modest form factor, able to be connected for secure direct internet access (DIA)…	N/A

Pricing

Cisco Catalyst 8000 Edge Platforms

Editions & Modules

No answers on this topic

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
Cisco Catalyst 8000 Edge Platforms
Free Trial
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

—

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	Cisco Catalyst 8000 Edge Platforms
Considered Both Products	Cisco Catalyst 8000 Edge Platforms Verified User Engineer Chose Cisco Catalyst 8000 Edge Platforms More versatile Incentivized Helpful? YY Ye Yang Senior Engineer Officer Chose Cisco Catalyst 8000 Edge Platforms Compared to the Cisco 2000 Series Connected GRID Routers, CGR2010, the Cisco Catalyst 8000 Edge Platforms is more powerful in processing, and it has the capability to do the segment routing. It is easier to install physically and occupies less space in the rack, consumes less … Incentivized Helpful? peter mckenzie teacher Chose Cisco Catalyst 8000 Edge Platforms In my case I haven't evaluated any similar products as this is our sole Routing solution Incentivized Helpful? Daniel Falls Senior Network Engineer Chose Cisco Catalyst 8000 Edge Platforms I have no looked at other platforms, this was to replace several cisco devices and it was decided to go with the same company. Incentivized Helpful? WP Wagner Pereira System Enginner Chose Cisco Catalyst 8000 Edge Platforms Used to conect VPN with mai site Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Engineer Chose Cisco Catalyst 8000 Edge Platforms It's a great cheaper alternative with high throughput and connectivity options. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Director Chose Cisco Catalyst 8000 Edge Platforms N/A. I chose Cisco only Incentivized Helpful? JP Jalpa Patel Tech support engineer Chose Cisco Catalyst 8000 Edge Platforms well suited for our education purpose Incentivized Helpful? GV Giorgio Vezzaro Pre sales IT systems engineer Chose Cisco Catalyst 8000 Edge Platforms Cisco has a lower price for value against the other two vendors, because they delivers more interfaces for less money and don't need subscriptions for licensing the routing features Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Consultant Chose Cisco Catalyst 8000 Edge Platforms 8K is the prospective successor of ASR1k (fixed) and ISR 4K Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Account Manager Chose Cisco Catalyst 8000 Edge Platforms still under evaluation Incentivized Helpful? DV Danny Van den eijnde Architect Chose Cisco Catalyst 8000 Edge Platforms Newest with support Incentivized Helpful? ES Emmanuel Sklivakis Information Technology Audit Manager Chose Cisco Catalyst 8000 Edge Platforms Looking for edge device not only a router Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Engineer Chose Cisco Catalyst 8000 Edge Platforms There isn't any other product which supports SDWAN other than legacy ISR4K. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Engineer Chose Cisco Catalyst 8000 Edge Platforms More Features provided and better hardware. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Team Lead Chose Cisco Catalyst 8000 Edge Platforms The Catalyst 8000 Edge Platforms are lacking the versatility of the previous ISR4k series in terms of connectivity and expansion slots, mainly on the lower tier versions (8200 vs 4321 and 4331). We had no problems with the traditional ISR 400 series and we applied them to … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Engineer Chose Cisco Catalyst 8000 Edge Platforms I have to design, some things I have to use ISR4000 depending on throughput, also ISR1100, Routers RV small business, and ASR1000. If you need to use a device to SDWAN or cloud, you have to use 8000 because ASR1000 has many throughputs of data, but for security, and … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Professional Chose Cisco Catalyst 8000 Edge Platforms This evolves out of ASR1k platforms which lacked features like cloud integration and port density, Catalyst 8000 Edge Platforms seem to be packed with features particularly geared towards SDWAN and intent-based networking which is the need of the day on edge platforms. This … Incentivized Helpful?
Top Pros	Pro Integration with cisco Pro Sd wan Pro Better performance
Top Cons	Minus Different colors Minus Getting started Minus Long way

Best Alternatives
	Cisco Catalyst 8000 Edge Platforms
Small Businesses	No answers on this topic
Medium-sized Companies	Extreme Networks Wired Access - Switches Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises	Cisco Nexus Series Switches Score 9.0 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Cisco Catalyst 8000 Edge Platforms
Likelihood to Recommend	8.3 (23 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew	7.7 (2 ratings)
Usability	8.2 (1 ratings)
Support Rating	7.7 (2 ratings)
Implementation Rating	8.2 (1 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Cisco Catalyst 8000 Edge Platforms
Likelihood to Recommend	Cisco With the flexibility of sizing options, the Cisco Catalyst 8000 Edge Platforms has worked to deliver solutions for our various needs. Smaller systems offer strong connectivity for office developments. Mid-range options have served our larger campuses well. Our data center deployments of the larger systems have provided up to 100G connectivity and advanced routing solutions. The Cisco Catalyst 8000 Edge Platforms continues to meet our needs and exceed our expectations. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Pros	Cisco More resources for tunneling Ability to use sdwan softwre More memory for tcam tables Ability to utilize T1 lines for PRI Ability to act as a SBC for VoIP communication Rfid usage Incentivized Daniel Falls Senior Network Engineer Read full review
Cons	Cisco Adding more NIM slots on motherboard Adding PVDM slot for use cases where the router is used only for trans coding Adding more granular tiers for DNA licensing. For example it is a big gap between 2000Mbps (400 Mbps agg) and 1Gbps (2 Gbps Agg) Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Likelihood to Renew	Cisco Because I have had no issues with this product line and have grown go really trust in it. One of the besr thing is that this has had less vulnerabilities that the past cisco router that I have dealt with. In my line of work needing to upgrade code is always something that needs to be done after hours and most likely on weekends. Incentivized Daniel Falls Senior Network Engineer Read full review
Usability	Cisco it`s very easy to use it Incentivized WP Wagner Pereira System Enginner Read full review
Support Rating	Cisco I have always had great response time and have never been let down by cisco support. I have had issues where the person who was assisting me was not able to provide a resolution but by utilizing his team members they where able to come together to provide a answer and resplve the situation. Incentivized Daniel Falls Senior Network Engineer Read full review
Implementation Rating	Cisco the licensing is messy Incentivized WP Wagner Pereira System Enginner Read full review
Alternatives Considered	Cisco Compared to the Cisco 2000 Series Connected GRID Routers, CGR2010, the Cisco Catalyst 8000 Edge Platforms is more powerful in processing, and it has the capability to do the segment routing. It is easier to install physically and occupies less space in the rack, consumes less power, and saves more for the company. Incentivized YY Ye Yang Senior Engineer Officer Read full review
Return on Investment	Cisco Improving the performance and the availability, it has increased the SLA we can ensure to the customers and so the sales has increased The initial expense is really high so the breakeven point is not so near The opex for licensing is high too Incentivized GV Giorgio Vezzaro Pre sales IT systems engineer Read full review
ScreenShots