Copado vs. JFrog Pipelines

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Copado
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
Copado is a Native Full DevOps Solution for Salesforce from the company of the same name in Chicago, designed to support fast, error-free releases. Its value stream maps enable users to visualize a team’s delivery process, identify bottlenecks, and gather metrics and insights on time and quality. Users can automatically merge and manage Salesforce XML with dynamically created release plans and 12 types of deployment steps, including full profiles. In March 2021, Copado acquired New…N/A
JFrog Pipelines
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
JFrog Pipelines (formerly Shippable, acquired by JFrog Feb 2019) is a build automation tool designed to provide simple continuous delivery.N/A
Pricing
CopadoJFrog Pipelines
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CopadoJFrog Pipelines
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
CopadoJFrog Pipelines
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons
Best Alternatives
CopadoJFrog Pipelines
Small Businesses
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.9 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
AWS CodePipeline
AWS CodePipeline
Score 9.1 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.9 out of 10
Enterprises
AWS CodePipeline
AWS CodePipeline
Score 9.1 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
CopadoJFrog Pipelines
Likelihood to Recommend
8.5
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
CopadoJFrog Pipelines
Likelihood to Recommend
Copado Solutions
When we have a large organization and number of changes and deployments are more than we should go for Copado. As we know it is a paid managed package and the cost is high so for dealing with fewer deployments it is not preferable to buy. Copado is well suited for users who don't have much technical understanding. So those users can see the User interface select the changes that need to be deployed by selecting the metadata. From Git operation to deployment all is handled by Copado itself. Copado has reduced the efforts for creating the package.xml and direct deployments can be done within a few clicks. Another Major aspect is that it can be directly synced with Jira or Azzure board from where the user stories will be synced and actions can be performed accordingly. For small organization, Copado can be expensive and to set up and maintain we need a technical person to do so.
Read full review
JFrog
No answers on this topic
Pros
Copado Solutions
  • Metadata Deployments
  • Data Deployments
  • Salesforce CPQ deployments that require a lot of various Data
  • Transferring deployments between teams.
Read full review
JFrog
No answers on this topic
Cons
Copado Solutions
  • Back promotions are sometimes difficult and behave in a weird manner
  • After the deployment to production next changes in the pull request shows all the changes from the previous release as well
  • Cannot be used through mobile
Read full review
JFrog
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Copado Solutions
Flosum is a downgrade for sure and I do not recommend it. Gearset is an upgrade and my preferred solution. Gearset has simplified the deployment path and makes it very easy to move between Salesforce instances. If there are any difficulties with Gearset they also have the best customer support for any deployment tool I've tried. Overall I'd say Gearset is #1, Copado #2 and Flosum a distant #3.
Read full review
JFrog
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Copado Solutions
  • It has reduced the efforts to create package.xml manually and deploy the changes
  • Another positive impact is that we can track the commits to which org they have reached in an organized way and we don't need to maintain them separately
  • For setting Copado it take a lot of time and training is required for the complete setup which is time-consuming
Read full review
JFrog
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots