Elastic Enterprise Search vs. Lucidworks Fusion

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Elastic Enterprise Search
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
Elastic Enterprise Search Swiftype is a platform with modules for Site Search, App Search and Workplace Search, that boasts powering search for thousands of enterprises and websites. The services were developed by Swiftype and acquired by Elastic in late 2017. Powered by Elasticsearch, the vendor states Elastic Enterprise Search is fast, with proven, optimized relevance models designed for real-life, natural search.
$79
per month
Lucidworks Fusion
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Lucidworks headquartered in San Francisco offers the Fusion Platform, an enterprise search application development platform supporting NoSQL and unstructured data search, and having machine learning augmented recommenders and search capabilities.N/A
Pricing
Elastic Enterprise SearchLucidworks Fusion
Editions & Modules
Standard
$79
per month
Pro
$199
per month
Premium
Custom
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Elastic Enterprise SearchLucidworks Fusion
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Elastic Enterprise SearchLucidworks Fusion
Top Pros
Top Cons
Best Alternatives
Elastic Enterprise SearchLucidworks Fusion
Small Businesses
Algolia
Algolia
Score 8.9 out of 10
Algolia
Algolia
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Guru
Guru
Score 9.0 out of 10
Guru
Guru
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Guru
Guru
Score 9.0 out of 10
Guru
Guru
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Elastic Enterprise SearchLucidworks Fusion
Likelihood to Recommend
8.1
(2 ratings)
9.1
(2 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
Elastic Enterprise SearchLucidworks Fusion
Likelihood to Recommend
Elastic
Swiftype is excellent for e-commerce companies and especially the financial services sector where speed plays a major role in executing transactions. It is also very dynamic and customizable. It is very useful for electronics/travel reservations on e-commerce sites also. The only place it is inappropriate is when it comes to indexing a website in which case Google is slightly better, as I mentioned before. There is nothing much to complain about here in regards to the breadth of applications and analytics it offers.
Read full review
Lucidworks
Very well suited for out of the box enterprise search applications.
Read full review
Pros
Elastic
  • It's very easy to implement. The documentation is great and you can be up and running very quickly.
  • It's easy to configure. The web-based user interface makes it super simple to configure (i.e. customize search rankings, edit synonyms, etc.).
  • Their support is very friendly and helpful. Whenever I had a question or couldn't figure something old, they were quick to help me out.
Read full review
Lucidworks
  • Signals feature to boost search results helps search relevancy
  • Business Rules feature for tuning search results
  • Query pipeline design gives great flexibility in application development
Read full review
Cons
Elastic
  • Swiftype does not have indexes ready to go. When you add a new website to the search set, it takes some time to index the website. This is something that is different from what Google does. Google in this particular aspect does a relatively better job.
  • Swiftype is very expensive, this makes it difficult for smaller companies to afford.
Read full review
Lucidworks
  • Documentation can be improved
Read full review
Usability
Elastic
No answers on this topic
Lucidworks
It is incredibly intuitive and so easy to use that business people can now complete functions that used to be limited to software developers only.
Read full review
Support Rating
Elastic
No answers on this topic
Lucidworks
It has continued to improve over the years.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Elastic
Google Search Appliance is no longer supported. Apache Solr is a popular, free open source solution, but it lacks a web crawler and is more difficult to configure and maintain.
Read full review
Lucidworks
IDOL seems to be a blackbox solution. Fusion is much more flexible with more features and options for developers to choose from.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Elastic
  • It has a positive impact as it helps traders and other users to seamlessly use applications.
  • It has a positive ROI and we would know the results in time to come.
Read full review
Lucidworks
  • Allowed us to move software developers from enterprise search to other customer focused applications due to built in signals processing and related popularity boosting out of the box.
  • Enabled business experts to work directly with Fusion to influence search results and not be so dependent on developers.
Read full review
ScreenShots