Gong vs. Lilt

Gong is great for Sales people trying to capture all details with customer engagement, so it is ideal in that industry. I am not sure if Gong would be as strong of a tool if you are in Law or Finance there might be privacy concerns around what is said and stored.

Incentivized

Lilt is a great platform for translating and reviewing content for mainstream languages that are spoken by a large number of people such as Spanish, French, etc. in which case the machine translation tool does a great job of adding the appropriate fluency, grammar, and punctuations. The QA checks also likewise provide apt feedback with rarely any errors. The only shortfall for Lilt is when the content to be translated belongs to any non-mainstream languages (such as regional Indian state ones) and the most noticeable errors are thrown by the QA check tools which have several long-standing unfixed bugs.

Incentivized

• AI summaries- reviewing everything discussed without going through the whole recording or transcript.
• Next steps summary- helping me tie up my meeting with action items after the fact.
• Call statistics let me know how frequently everyone is speaking and where patience can be practiced in allowing others to speak.

Incentivized

• Provide exact and fuzzy match feedback for translations
• Provide step by step segmented workflow for translating
• Great QA checks including Batch and Full to help detecting errors
• Good machine translation feedback to help translators

Incentivized

• It could use a predefined follow-up email template and populate the predefined fields or questions.
• It could ask you when to start recording (on Zoom) instead of doing it at some awkward random moment.
• It sometimes misses the speaker when creating a transcript.

Incentivized

• Provide greater quality feedback for non-mainstream languages such as Indian regional
• Improve punctuation and grammar fluency for non-mainstream languages
• Fix long standing bug issues in QA check reporting mechanism

Incentivized

We love Gong and our customers like it too. We can bring additional value by being to provide a dialogue of all our customer conversations.

Incentivized

It's got a solid infrastructure; it doesn't take too much time to understand how it works, and it can get many of the features up and running fairly quickly. It's pretty intuitive to use most of it, although some features might require a deeper dive. Sometimes, I find myself clicking through a million screens to get a report.

Incentivized

I give them a 10 because, I have been using Gong for over a year now and have never had issues or concerns go un resolved in a day or two. Their communication is impeccable and their tech support is very hands on and prompt

Incentivized

This is nothing something I'm able to answer

Incentivized

The chorus is good, but Gong is a little better in every aspect. But not much. Outreach's AI is pretty good and helps with live training and feedback. I think many of the solutions are comparable; at that point, it's about what's in your current tech stack and how to avoid overlap. In my situation, we already have Hubspot, so Outreach was not required.

Incentivized

I was not involved with the process

Incentivized

I was not involved with the process

Incentivized

• Time savings on email recaps and meeting notes; fully automated if you let the team lean into these features!
• It saves me time from having to attend every client call, especially since most of my team is 3 hours ahead of me, so I have limited time to join their calls to begin with.
• Specific feedback about a moment vs. generic feedback.

Incentivized

• Lilt is helping my organization localize its products to a lot more languages
• Helps translating large content data like web pages with ease
• Improves overall quality of work done and hence help gain more clients

Incentivized