Google Analytics is perhaps the best-known web analytics product and, as a free product, it has massive adoption. Although it lacks some enterprise-level features compared to its competitors in the space, the launch of the paid Google Analytics Premium edition seems likely to close the gap.
$0
per month
Optimizely Web Experimentation
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
Whether launching a first test or scaling a sophisticated experimentation program, Optimizely Web Experimentation aims to deliver the insights needed to craft high-performing digital experiences that drive engagement, increase conversions, and accelerate growth.
N/A
Agentforce Marketing
Score 7.7 out of 10
N/A
Marketing Cloud is a cloud-based digital marketing platform, used by marketers can segment their audience, deliver personalized messages, track campaign performance, engage leads and accounts, and optimize strategies based on real-time insights.
Google Analytics is the only tool of its kind (that I'm aware of). Other tools, like website builders, may have built-in analytics, but they're nothing compared to what Google Analytics offers.
I have used Moz and Google Analytics. They provide overlapping information, but they also provide unique information. I like that Moz shares broken images and links and points out problems on the site that are slowing down the site and effecting the site's performance and …
I've spoken pretty extensively already about how Adobe Analytics and Google Analytics compare, but again it's not really close between the two tools. Again, there may be some use cases where GA makes more sense (primarily if you are trying to cut down on the expenses of the …
Google Analytics provided all the tools that we needed. We found that the other tools were a little more difficult to use and create reports. Additionally, the integrations that Google Analytics provided was a lot more efficient in terms of what we were looking for. Very …
We also use Pardot to monitor traffic to our site. Google Analytics gives you a lot more data. Pardot is more focused on once the traffic to our site identifies themselves (by filling out a form) and how they engage with us after that (email opens, website views, etc.).
Google Optimize was much less flexible for our program needs and requires Google Analytics for analysis and metrics tracking. Optimizely Web Experimentation lets you build any number of metrics which can be much more complex than standard GA goals. Optimizely Web …
It's a lot more, well, site stacked, it's way better than that. Adobe Target. I think the UI is easier to use on Optimizely. The one thing that I would say comparatively is our analytics talking to each other. Obviously Adobe, we use Adobe Analytics and Adobe Target, so they …
The ability to do A/B testing in Optimizely along with the associated statistical modelling and audience segmentation means it is a much better solution than using something like Google Analytics were a lot more effort is required to identify and isolate the specific data you …
Best-in-Class Experiment Design compared to platforms like VWO and Convert. Optimizely offers a more polished and intuitive UI for setting up experiments. It feels purpose-built with lots of concurrent tests. Features like traffic allocation, audience targeting, and variation …
None of them have a best in class stats engine and live within an ecosystem of marketing technology products the way that Optimizely does, so the scalability of using any one of those tools is limited as compared to using Optimizely Web Experimentation.
Optimizely is more user-friendly and cost-effective, ideal for experimentation-focused teams, while Adobe Target excels in advanced personalization and seamless integration within the Adobe ecosystem, making it better suited for large enterprises.
It's slightly more complicated to use, but in my experience, it has more capabilities. Also, Google Optimize was depreciated, so this is definitely the next best platform.
Optimizely is a far more comprehensive solution. While it's true there are competitors to X Web, there's nothing to touch Optimizely's Full Stack product. Their customer support is based out of the USA, which cuts down wait times if we have questions/issues. This wasn't the …
Optimizely has better customer service if you need to talk to a person and a great library of documentation if you run into issues and want to troubleshoot yourself. Web Experimentation has allowed for our testing capabilities to grow as our research program develops. …
Google Optimize was great, but our organization already had contracts with Optimizely Web Experimentation for their other tools. unbounce wasn't really an option either mainly because it was only a landing page testing tool and had to use their platform to host the tests. We …
Optimizely is an integrated solution that supports all the performance areas and does the analytics while working on all other areas. The products I use were a lot more simple, they helped me but in a limited way so I came to search for software and tool which fitted really well.
We have evaluated Optimize every year against Optimizely. I am a google fan, but their product is not up to the level of Optimizely. They do not offer multi-page tests, and a lot of our changes sometimes span the whole funnel. For that reason alone, it's currently unusable.
Pardot out-ranks the competition in regards to the integration with Salesforce. It is hard to beat the ability to use your already-made customer profiles and contact information in your marketing campaigns. Where it is lacking is the usability. MailChimp is a much more user …
The only other product we evaluated was HubSpot. We felt that for the cost, Pardot was a better option for us.
Verified User
Employee
Chose Salesforce Agentforce Marketing
I have used Bitly to track the performance of social media links. I found Pardot to be superior because of its capability to identify and track individuals. I prefer using Pardot to Adobe because it provides details about individual customers. I also prefer Pardot over Google …
We used HubSpot before and it performed well. However, as we were planning to adopt NetSuite as our ERP, we needed a marketing solution that integrated well with it. That's where HubSpot fell short. Pardot had a built in integration with NetSuite via a Pardot connector. Also, …
Eloqua was too expensive. Marketo, is a very slick product, and the pricing they offered us for the lowest-level version (Small and Medium Business) was competitive, but still about $3,000 per year more than Pardot. One big issue with Marketo though was …
Features
Google Analytics
Optimizely Web Experimentation
Salesforce Agentforce Marketing
Web Analytics
Comparison of Web Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Google Analytics
8.4
11 Ratings
4% above category average
Optimizely Web Experimentation
-
Ratings
Salesforce Agentforce Marketing
-
Ratings
Lead Conversion Tracking
8.110 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Bounce Rate Measurement
8.410 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Device and Browser Reporting
9.211 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Pageview Tracking
9.011 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Event Tracking
8.311 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting in real-time
7.910 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Referral Source Tracking
8.510 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customizable Dashboards
7.910 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Testing and Experimentation
Comparison of Testing and Experimentation features of Product A and Product B
Google Analytics
-
Ratings
Optimizely Web Experimentation
8.0
163 Ratings
5% below category average
Salesforce Agentforce Marketing
-
Ratings
a/b experiment testing
00 Ratings
9.0163 Ratings
00 Ratings
Split URL testing
00 Ratings
8.5135 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multivariate testing
00 Ratings
8.4139 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multi-page/funnel testing
00 Ratings
7.9126 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cross-browser testing
00 Ratings
8.197 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile app testing
00 Ratings
8.175 Ratings
00 Ratings
Test significance
00 Ratings
8.4147 Ratings
00 Ratings
Visual / WYSIWYG editor
00 Ratings
8.1133 Ratings
00 Ratings
Advanced code editor
00 Ratings
8.0125 Ratings
00 Ratings
Page surveys
00 Ratings
6.217 Ratings
00 Ratings
Visitor recordings
00 Ratings
8.418 Ratings
00 Ratings
Preview mode
00 Ratings
7.6145 Ratings
00 Ratings
Test duration calculator
00 Ratings
7.9112 Ratings
00 Ratings
Experiment scheduler
00 Ratings
8.2112 Ratings
00 Ratings
Experiment workflow and approval
00 Ratings
7.890 Ratings
00 Ratings
Dynamic experiment activation
00 Ratings
7.574 Ratings
00 Ratings
Client-side tests
00 Ratings
7.896 Ratings
00 Ratings
Server-side tests
00 Ratings
7.250 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mutually exclusive tests
00 Ratings
8.180 Ratings
00 Ratings
Audience Segmentation & Targeting
Comparison of Audience Segmentation & Targeting features of Product A and Product B
Google Analytics
-
Ratings
Optimizely Web Experimentation
8.2
152 Ratings
7% below category average
Salesforce Agentforce Marketing
-
Ratings
Standard visitor segmentation
00 Ratings
8.4147 Ratings
00 Ratings
Behavioral visitor segmentation
00 Ratings
7.7122 Ratings
00 Ratings
Traffic allocation control
00 Ratings
9.1144 Ratings
00 Ratings
Website personalization
00 Ratings
7.8111 Ratings
00 Ratings
Results and Analysis
Comparison of Results and Analysis features of Product A and Product B
Google Analytics
-
Ratings
Optimizely Web Experimentation
8.3
149 Ratings
4% below category average
Salesforce Agentforce Marketing
-
Ratings
Heatmap tool
00 Ratings
9.313 Ratings
00 Ratings
Click analytics
00 Ratings
8.833 Ratings
00 Ratings
Scroll maps
00 Ratings
8.517 Ratings
00 Ratings
Form fill analysis
00 Ratings
8.072 Ratings
00 Ratings
Conversion tracking
00 Ratings
8.744 Ratings
00 Ratings
Goal tracking
00 Ratings
8.2127 Ratings
00 Ratings
Test reporting
00 Ratings
7.9137 Ratings
00 Ratings
Results segmentation
00 Ratings
7.7103 Ratings
00 Ratings
CSV export
00 Ratings
7.9102 Ratings
00 Ratings
Experiments results dashboard
00 Ratings
8.049 Ratings
00 Ratings
Email & Online Marketing
Comparison of Email & Online Marketing features of Product A and Product B
Google Analytics
-
Ratings
Optimizely Web Experimentation
-
Ratings
Salesforce Agentforce Marketing
7.5
171 Ratings
2% below category average
WYSIWYG email editor
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.6122 Ratings
Dynamic content
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.0153 Ratings
Ability to test dynamic content
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
6.8112 Ratings
Landing pages
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.6121 Ratings
A/B testing
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.3151 Ratings
Mobile optimization
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
6.9111 Ratings
Email deliverability reporting
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.6132 Ratings
List management
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.2129 Ratings
Triggered drip sequences
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.595 Ratings
Lead Management
Comparison of Lead Management features of Product A and Product B
Google Analytics
-
Ratings
Optimizely Web Experimentation
-
Ratings
Salesforce Agentforce Marketing
8.1
124 Ratings
4% above category average
Lead nurturing automation
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.6109 Ratings
Lead scoring and grading
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.1110 Ratings
Data quality management
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.5116 Ratings
Automated sales alerts and tasks
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.3101 Ratings
Campaign Management
Comparison of Campaign Management features of Product A and Product B
Google Analytics
-
Ratings
Optimizely Web Experimentation
-
Ratings
Salesforce Agentforce Marketing
7.5
114 Ratings
1% above category average
Calendaring
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.6103 Ratings
Event/webinar marketing
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.497 Ratings
Social Media Marketing
Comparison of Social Media Marketing features of Product A and Product B
Google Analytics
-
Ratings
Optimizely Web Experimentation
-
Ratings
Salesforce Agentforce Marketing
7.5
88 Ratings
2% above category average
Social sharing and campaigns
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.583 Ratings
Social profile integration
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.639 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Google Analytics
-
Ratings
Optimizely Web Experimentation
-
Ratings
Salesforce Agentforce Marketing
7.8
124 Ratings
6% above category average
Dashboards
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.2118 Ratings
Standard reports
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.7123 Ratings
Custom reports
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.5100 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Product A and Product B
Google Analytics is particularly well suited for tracking and analyzing customer behavior on a grocery e-commerce platform. It provides a wealth of information about customer behavior, including what products are most popular, what pages are visited the most, and where customers are coming from. This information can help the platform optimize its website for better customer engagement and conversion rates. However, Google Analytics may not be the best tool for more advanced, granular analysis of customer behavior, such as tracking individual customer journeys or understanding customer motivations. In these cases, it may be more appropriate to use additional tools or solutions that provide deeper insights into customer behavior.
I think it can serve the whole spectrum of experiences from people who are just getting used to web experimentation. It's really easy to pick up and use. If you're more experienced then it works well because it just gets out of the way and lets you really focus on the experimentation side of things. So yeah, strongly recommend. I think it is well suited both to small businesses and large enterprises as well. I think it's got a really low barrier to entry. It's very easy to integrate on your website and get results quickly. Likewise, if you are a big business, it's incrementally adoptable, so you can start out with one component of optimizing and you can build there and start to build in things like data CMS to augment experimentation as well. So it's got a really strong a pathway to grow your MarTech platform if you're a small company or a big company.
I think the product, by definition, is meant for marketing — and we use it exactly for that, for running campaigns. That’s the best-suited use case for the product. I don’t think it’s really meant to be used for anything else — that’s just not how it’s designed.
The Platform contains drag-and-drop editor options for creating variations, which ease the A/B tests process, as it does not require any coding or development resources.
Establishing it is so simple that even a non-technical person can do it perfectly.
It provides real-time results and analytics with robust dashboard access through which you can quickly analyze how different variations perform. With this, your team can easily make data-driven decisions Fastly.
We will continue to use Google Analytics for several reasons. It is free, which is a huge selling point. It houses all of our ecommerce stores' data, and though it can't account for refunds or fraud orders, gives us and our clients directional, real time information on individual and group store performance.
I rated this question because at this stage, Optimizely does most everything we need so I don't foresee a need to migrate to a new tool. We have the infrastructure already in place and it is a sizeable lift to pivot to another tool with no guarantee that it will work as good or even better than Optimizely
As of right now we have not seen any other program that integrates as seamlessly into our Salesforce platform. We have barely scratched the surface of all the features and use cases. It would be irresponsible to make a move to another platform in the near future. We have not come up against any limitations that would prompt a need to switch
Google Analytics provides a wealth of data, down to minute levels. That is it's greatest detriment: find the right information when you need it can be a cumbersome task. You are able to create shortcuts, however, so it can mitigate some of this problem. Google is continually refining Analytics, so I do not doubt there will be improvements
Optimizely Web Experimentation's visual editor is handy for non-technical or quick iterative testing. When it comes to content changes it's as easy as going into wordpress, clicking around, and then seeing your changes live--what you see is what you get. The preview and approval process for sharing built experiments is also handy for sharing experiments across teams for QA purposes or otherwise.
You won't find another solution that has as many features as Salesforce Marketing Cloud Interaction Studio. We all know Salesforce, we all know how big they are and it's not for nothing... Their tools do most of the things you want, need and even imagine. Using it is complicated, but the usability is infinite.
We all know Google is at top when it comes to availability. We have never faced any such instances where I can suggest otherwise. All you need is a Google account, a device and internet connection to use this super powerful tool for reporting and visualising your site data, traffic, events, etc. that too in real time.
I would rate Optimizely Web Experimentation's availability as a 10 out of 10. The software is reliable and does not experience any application errors or unplanned outages. Additionally, the customer service and technical support teams are always available to help with any issues or questions.
Upgrades and timing of the upgrades were communicated well and planned during off hours for our work. If we did have a campaign scheduled during that time, it would kick-off after the system was back active. There were a few unplanned system down times, but it was a rare occurrence and those times were also short in duration.
This has been a catalyst for improving our site's traffic handling capabilities. We were able to identify exit% from our sites through it and we used recommendations to handle and implement the same in our sites. We have been increasing the usage of Google Analytics in our sites and never had any performance related issues if we used Analytics
I would rate Optimizely Web Experimentation's performance as a 9 out of 10. Pages load quickly, reports are complete in a reasonable time frame, and the software does not slow down any other software or systems that it integrates with. Additionally, the customer service and technical support teams are always available to help with any issues or questions.
Though the make up of MA apps is not built this way today, it would be nice to see them become more real-time. The integration between Salesforce and Pardot is not a true real-time integration. If I modify something in Salesforce, those changes are not automatically reflected in Pardot immediately. There is a delay of about 15 minutes before the systems sync. This delay, although not long, is less than ideal We would love the systems to be integrated real time such that changes are propagated from one system to the other immediately.
The Google reps respond very quickly. However, sometimes they can overly call you to set up an apportionment. I'm very proficient and sometimes when I talk to reps, they give beginner tutorials and insights that are a waste of time. I wish Google would understand my level of expertise and assign me to a rep (long-term) that doesn't have to walk me through the basics.
They always are quick to respond, and are so friendly and helpful. They always answer the phone right away. And [they are] always willing to not only help you with your problem, but if you need ideas they have suggestions as well.
They are really responsive and more than not solve the problem or give you insight to how you can manage the solution yourself. I do find however sometimes a long delay on the more complex issues when they need to loop in other departments. but overall a good experience with support
The trainers at the Pardot user conference (Elevate and Connections) were very knowledgeable and presented the material well. Again, the content was targeted to more of a new user audience, and was not really relevant for folks who had been using the product for 2+ years.
love the product and training they provide for businesses of all sizes. The following list of links will help you get started with Google Analytics from setup to understanding what data is being presented by Google Analytics.
The tool itself is not very difficult to use so training was not very useful in my opinion. It did not also account for success events more complex than a click (which my company being ecommerce is looking to examine more than a mere click).
Pardot's online training touches on all topics briefly and vaguely without much indepth exploration into how a final outcome could look, such as Nurturing Campaigns, Email templates, landing page templates, etc... The only true way to uncover Pardot's full capabilities is to have Front End design and coding experience. Without this key skill set, I would not recommend Pardot to another business.
I think my biggest take away from the Google Analytics implementation was that there needs to be a clear understanding of what you want to achieve and how you want to achieve it before you start. Originally the analytics were added to track visitors, but as we became more savvy with the product, we began adding more and more functionality, and defining guidelines as we went along. While not detrimental to our success, this lack of an overarching goal resulted in some minor setbacks in implementation and the collection of some messy data that is unusable.
In retrospect: - I think I should have stressed more demo's / workshopping with the Optimizely team at the start. I felt too confident during demo stages, and when came time to actually start, I was a bit lost. (The answer is likely I should have had them on-hand for our first install.. they offered but I thought I was OK.) - Really getting an understanding / asking them prior to install of how to make it really work for checkout pages / one that uses dynamic content or user interaction to determine what the UI does. Could have saved some time by addressing this at the beginning, as some things we needed to create on our site for Optimizely to "use" as a trigger for the variation test. - Having a number of planned/hoped-for tests already in-hand before working with Optimizely team. Sharing those thoughts with them would likely have started conversations on additional things we needed to do to make them work (rather than figuring that out during the actual builds). Since I had development time available, I could have added more things to the baseline installation since my developers were already "looking under the hood" of the site.
From an IT perspective, once you set up the Javascript beacon and start collecting data there is a waiting game. During this time you can start labeling your site actions which can be labor intensive for a single person, but you don't really have the final end-users on the platform yet. We did a lot of training so users were experienced, but it wasn't until they had their first tasks to accomplish that they started using the system and had questions. I'd recommend setting up some immediate goals for an end-user to start segmenting for the purpose of displaying message campaigns so you can jump start end-user action.
I have not used Adobe Analytics as much, but I know they offer something called customer journey analytics, which we are evaluating now. I have used Semrush, and I find them much better than Google Analytics. I feel a fairly nontechnical person could learn Semrush in about a month. They also offer features like competitive analysis (on content, keywords, traffic, etc.), which is very useful. If you have to choose one among Semrush and Google Analytics, I would say go for Semrush.
The ability to do A/B testing in Optimizely along with the associated statistical modelling and audience segmentation means it is a much better solution than using something like Google Analytics were a lot more effort is required to identify and isolate the specific data you need to confidently make changes
We use Salesforce Marketing Cloud for lead management, generating reports, tracking customer and dealer information, inputting orders, and more. I prefer HubSpot for email marketing and automation because it is easier to use and the emails are designed much better. We currently use Salesforce and HubSpot, and we are very happy to have both, as they have different pros/cons.
Google Analytics is currently handling the reporting and tracking of near about 80 sites in our project. And I am not talking about the sites from different projects. They may have way more accounts than that. Never ever felt a performance issue from Google's end while generating or customising reports or tracking custom events or creating custom dimensions
We can use it flexibly across lines of business and have it in use across two departments. We have different use cases and slightly different outcomes, but can unify our results based on impact to the bottom line. Finally, we can generate value from anywhere in the org for any stakeholders as needed.
Prior to this, we had no solution and literally were doing things on paper in a world where technology is outpacing paper. Having this process optimized has made it easier for the sales and marketing people to change information. From the training perspective, it has allowed us to see holes in where we could create additional support training, so the ROI here has been a lot more than just the optimization of a process.
We're able to share definitive annualized revenue projections with our team, showing what would happen if we put a test into Production
Showing the results of a test on a new page or feature prior to full implementation on a site saves developer time (if a test proves the new element doesn't deliver a significant improvement.
Making a change via the WYSIWYG interface allows us to see multiple changes without developer intervention.
Salesforce Marketing Cloud allows us to more efficiently reach out to a higher number of prospects.
Salesforce Marketing Cloud allows us to nimbly communicate important messages in a timely fashion to facilitate conversion.
Salesforce Marketing Cloud allows us to track who is opening our messages so that we can stop sending to those not interested and focus on the most engaged audiences.