LambdaTest is a cloud-based platform that helps users run manual and automation tests of their website and mobile apps. Users can test their native mobile application (Android and iOS) and mobile websites on Real Devices on cloud or choose from emulators & simulators for a multitude of configurations.
$15
per month per user
Pricing
LambdaTest
Editions & Modules
Lifetime Free
$0
1 Concurrent session Per Month
Live
15/Month (Billed Annually)
per month Parallel Test
Real Device (Includes Live)
25/ Month (Billed Annually)
per month Parallel Test
Web Automation
$79/per Month (Billed Annually)
per month Parallel Test
Web & Mobile Browser Automation
$99/per Month (Billed Annually)
per month Parallel Test
Native App Automation
$125/per Month (Billed Annually)
per month Parallel Test
Web & Mobile Browser on Real Device
$128/per Month (Billed Annually)
per month Parallel Test
HyperExecute Cloud (Multi OS)
$159/per Month (Billed Annually)
per month Parallel Test
HyperExecute On-Premise
CUSTOM PRICING
Parallel Test
Enterprise
CUSTOM PRICING
Parallel Test
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
LambdaTest
Free Trial
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
For Enterprises Customize plans. Please contact our Chat Support or drop us email at support@lambdatest.com
LambdaTest offers me a large number of real-time mobile devices and browsers for testing, as well as debugging tools like Screenshot Testing and Issue Tracker. This is what I like the most about LambdaTest and prefer it over Sauce Labs. Additionally, my team has reported faster …
The test runs are faster in Lambdatest, Integration of lambdatest is easier and lambdatest is less expensive compared to other products like BrowserStack or saucelabs
LambdaTest stands out from its competitors due to its affordable pricing model, intuitive user interface, and comprehensive set of features. Its real-time testing feature allows users to test their websites on a range of devices and browsers in real-time, enabling quick issue …
The dashboard on Lambda was a lot easier and more intuitive to use, BS may have offered the latest devices quicker but Lambda was never far behind and when comparing the two the experience with Lambda was a lot quicker and more fluid. The way the option were laid out was clean …
Verified User
Analyst
Chose LambdaTest
I have used Browserstack, which as I understand is a direct competitor for LambdaTest. LambdaTest is much quicker with its tool then Browserstack, which is a huge deal for me and the company I work in. Speed and efficiency is crucial to our company and that's one of the main …
We have been using BrowserStack as well but in terms of features speed and stability, I would say that LambdaTest is what my organization loved the most. Its wasy an intiative UI is good for even normal non-technical staff as well, Pricing wise LambdaTest is way good than Browse…
We can now provide our services with complete confidence that they will work seamlessly on all devices. The user interface is user-friendly and easy to navigate, making it easy for my team to get started with the platform. I highly recommend LambdaTest to any organization that …
LambdaTest beat the competition on value, reliability, speed and customer support. It was a pleasure to work with them throughout our proof of concept trial and they were extremely helpful.
It has real devices and native app testing but these are not our absolute priority and these two features were making it more expensive. Otherwise they are also really good at their offering and services. Real devices are tad bit slower in my opinion as compared to simulators …
In my opinion, I believe LambdaTest is very good and well suited for Cross-browser testing, Mobile application testing and Automated testing. But yes, there is always scope of improvement. In my experience, LambdaTest does not currently offer robust security testing features, so when we need to conduct extensive security testing on our applications we need to use other specialized tools
Sometimes the live apps gets slow so its better that this doesn't happen more often
Still room to add more device vendors like, Huawei now doesn't support play services so its better thay we also have some devices which are with Huawei services only
LambdaTest provides video recording and screenshots of all your tests in their test logs, which makes tracking easier. Test statuses, such as Lambda Error and VM allocation, allowed us to quickly troubleshoot any build that failed while executing. So overall, it's been great to use for our Tester and Developer team.
The customer support team is very active and cooperative. Once, I contacted them in their off timings because of an issue, I got an instant reply from the executive and he resolved the issue very efficiently. This is why we have been using LambdaTest for more than two years. It is best suited for us.
LambdaTest stands out from its competitors due to its affordable pricing model, intuitive user interface, and comprehensive set of features. Its real-time testing feature allows users to test their websites on a range of devices and browsers in real-time, enabling quick issue identification and resolution. The automated testing feature allows users to run tests in parallel across multiple browsers and devices, resulting in faster test execution and improved test coverage.LambdaTest's visual testing feature is particularly noteworthy as it enables users to identify visual differences between their website on different browsers and devices. This feature helps users identify and fix issues related to design or layout. LambdaTest also offers debugging tools that allow users to quickly identify and fix issues within their code.Compared to its competitors, LambdaTest offers an affordable and comprehensive solution for cross-browser testing. While each tool has its own strengths and weaknesses, LambdaTest's robust feature set, user-friendly interface, and affordable pricing make it a popular choice among developers and testers.