Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Microsoft Teams
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Teams combines video conferencing software with team collaboration tools. The communications platform allows MS Office users to conduct conference calls and share files via SharePoint, and join or initiate a group chat.
$4.80
per month per user
Wrike
Score 8.6 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Wrike is a project management and collaboration software. This solution connects tasks, discussions, and emails to the user’s project plan. Wrike is optimized for agile workflows and aims to help resolve data silos, poor visibility into work status, and missed deadlines and project failures.
$240
per year 2 users (minimum)
Pricing
Microsoft TeamsWrike
Editions & Modules
Microsoft Teams Essentials
$4.80
per month per user
Microsoft Teams Enterprise
$5.25
per month (paid yearly) per user
Microsoft Teams Enterprise
$5.25
per month per user
Microsoft 365 Business Basic
$7.20
per month per user
Microsoft 365 Business Standard
$15
per month per user
Wrike Free
$0
per month per user
Wrike Team
$10
per month (billed annually) per user (2-15 users)
Wrike Business
$25
per month (billed annually) per user (5-200 users)
Apex
Request a quote
per month per user
Pinnacle
Request a quote
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Microsoft TeamsWrike
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsDiscounts are available for non profit organizations.Every premium plan begins with a 14-day trial period.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Microsoft TeamsWrike
Considered Both Products
Microsoft Teams

No answer on this topic

Wrike
Chose Wrike
Asana is easier to use compared to Wrike having a steeper learning curve. However, be not afraid, you will be getting that value in a couple of months.
Chose Wrike
We looked at multiple produce, specifically Microsoft Project and Clarizen Go. Wrike had the customization we needed along with the support staff and training to implement the product. The user interface is great with many views available, including custom views. The built-in …
Chose Wrike
The features and automations in Wrike definitely overshadow the previous tools I've used. I think Asana has a slightly better visual appeal to it and I found navigation simpler vs Wrike but how detailed you can get with a tool like Wrike is unparalleled. Basecamp was actually …
Chose Wrike
Simply back then, Wrike was the cheapest alternative to what we needed out of a tool. So we commited to it back almost 10 years ago and are still working with them. Many core business processes are now within Wrike which has manifested its right to exist within our company.
Chose Wrike
I could list a ton more... but in reality, what has been a nice trend in this industry is that the top competing platforms with Wrike, all have adapted and added very similar features, things that didn't exist 5 years ago, are commonplace today among these listed. I would say, …
Chose Wrike
Notion is more for an individual task list, and Slack is all about communication, whereas Wrike is a mix of both, with better status updates.
Chose Wrike
It does everything better in terms of organization and workflow. But, Slack has built in call. It's the only missing peace for Wrike. If I could call people from Wrike, it will remove the need of team and other call platform. But for the rest, Wrike feels to me like the better …
Chose Wrike
Wrike is completely customizable. I began my project management tool in Monday, but really established myself when I switched to ClickUp. I felt like I wanted to keep some similarities to how I worked in ClickUp when our company made the switch to Wrike, and I was able to mimic …
Chose Wrike
We use both monday.com and Wrike. While Monday does have a better user interface, Wrike allows us to have more visibility into tasks where multiple people are collaborating. And also to receive project brief-ins and requests for new projects. We use both differently and I would …
Chose Wrike
Wrike is optimized for larger teams that like to customize everything, while Asana is best for coordinating complex projects across teams.
Chose Wrike
Wrike has everything and all the information in one place which is really nice. with other platforms you have to use multiple apps at once and it can get overwhelming.
Chose Wrike
I was not included in the selection process of Wrike. I've used monday.com at a previous employer
Chose Wrike
I like Wrike best. I liked Asana, but I think it got too pricey for the features that we wanted out of it. Notion was fine, but I think its ability to integrate with the rest of our tech stack proved difficult. Trello was fine, it was early in my career and I remember its ease …
Chose Wrike
In the past, I've used other project management products like Asana, Flow, Kantata, and Microsoft Project. While all have similar options and end goals in mind, Wrike is the most seamless and effective, regardless of platform—browser, desktop app, or mobile app. It's the most …
Chose Wrike
We chose Wrike after careful software selection with three other products. The goal is to identify and define a working standard for greater efficiency during the definition, planning, execution, monitoring, and finalization of products. Wrike proved to be the best and easiest …
Chose Wrike
Wrike always works - it's always up-to-date, never down, and our one source of truth.
I wish the mobile version of Wrike was more usable, but that's the only thing where Wrike may not be the front runner.
Chose Wrike
There are similarities in offerings, but Wrike is more friendly in the visual presentation of the projects.
Chose Wrike
I like the Wrike app and how easy it is to use on a mobile device. It's also very user-friendly.
Chose Wrike
Wrike is a unique and wholesome tool that would provide you with all the views like Smartsheet and also all the required features for agile work management like JIRA. However these are tools probably are great at what they do in specific areas and Wrike has not yet just …
Chose Wrike
We had only evaluated Monday and Asana on a surface level before we chose Wrike, so never went to try a trial, but from what we saw in terms of functionality and customizability they both didn't seem to match up with our varied needs as a very diverse company dealing with …
Chose Wrike
Compared to other project management software we have used, Wrike is easy to implement and garner user acceptance. Other applications we have used and complex to configure and maintain, whereas Wrike is intuitive and simple to understand out of the gate. The communication …
Chose Wrike
We moved from excel trackers and SharePoint Classic forms/lists to Wrike. We were never able to create a branching logic request form so it was long and cumbersome. We had to manually put together excel sheets from several sources to report out our work so leadership had little …
Chose Wrike
Wrike has better customization and integrations Flexibility to give different access depending on what it is needed. Spaces provide independence for each Team to set up what they need Open to feedback from users and implementing changes suggested by users Learning material …
Features
Microsoft TeamsWrike
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Teams
8.1
239 Ratings
4% above category average
Wrike
8.0
919 Ratings
3% above category average
Task Management8.0178 Ratings9.1910 Ratings
Gantt Charts7.995 Ratings7.8638 Ratings
Scheduling8.1206 Ratings8.4795 Ratings
Workflow Automation8.3125 Ratings7.9787 Ratings
Mobile Access8.2227 Ratings7.9662 Ratings
Search7.6210 Ratings00 Ratings
Visual planning tools8.4141 Ratings00 Ratings
Resource Management00 Ratings7.7782 Ratings
Team Collaboration00 Ratings8.6910 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology00 Ratings7.7506 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology00 Ratings7.9455 Ratings
Document Management00 Ratings7.6765 Ratings
Email integration00 Ratings7.8685 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking00 Ratings7.7429 Ratings
Change request and Case Management00 Ratings7.723 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management00 Ratings7.6328 Ratings
Communication
Comparison of Communication features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Teams
8.0
249 Ratings
0% above category average
Wrike
-
Ratings
Chat9.0248 Ratings00 Ratings
Notifications8.4247 Ratings00 Ratings
Discussions8.6233 Ratings00 Ratings
Surveys8.2144 Ratings00 Ratings
Internal knowledgebase8.6155 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrates with GoToMeeting6.547 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrates with Gmail and Google Hangouts5.743 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrates with Outlook9.1155 Ratings00 Ratings
File Sharing & Management
Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Teams
8.2
234 Ratings
2% above category average
Wrike
-
Ratings
Versioning8.5166 Ratings00 Ratings
Video files8.3200 Ratings00 Ratings
Audio files8.7198 Ratings00 Ratings
Document collaboration8.8214 Ratings00 Ratings
Access control8.6196 Ratings00 Ratings
Advanced security features8.5156 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrates with Google Drive5.353 Ratings00 Ratings
Device sync8.5170 Ratings00 Ratings
Professional Services Automation
Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Teams
-
Ratings
Wrike
7.6
337 Ratings
2% below category average
Quotes/estimates00 Ratings8.21 Ratings
Invoicing00 Ratings6.510 Ratings
Project & financial reporting00 Ratings7.7332 Ratings
Integration with accounting software00 Ratings7.9200 Ratings
User Ratings
Microsoft TeamsWrike
Likelihood to Recommend
8.6
(327 ratings)
8.5
(951 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.0
(12 ratings)
8.5
(106 ratings)
Usability
8.6
(112 ratings)
8.5
(287 ratings)
Availability
9.0
(1 ratings)
8.2
(24 ratings)
Performance
8.0
(1 ratings)
6.6
(21 ratings)
Support Rating
8.0
(114 ratings)
9.4
(93 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(5 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(13 ratings)
Implementation Rating
10.0
(1 ratings)
9.9
(35 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
7.6
(14 ratings)
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
6.3
(7 ratings)
8.3
(5 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
6.9
(7 ratings)
Product Scalability
10.0
(1 ratings)
8.1
(15 ratings)
Professional Services
7.0
(7 ratings)
9.1
(4 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(8 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
7.6
(9 ratings)
User Testimonials
Microsoft TeamsWrike
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
It's amazing as a daily driver for team communication, and document search/store. Also, if you're doing a lot of LONG meetings and have trouble remembering details, the AI summarization is amazing and convenient. It just works. I'm not saying I always do this, of course, but if I need to 'skim' instead of really digging into every detail from a meeting, the AI-generated summary is generally good enough that I can get away with it.
Read full review
Wrike
I believe it's well suited if you have multiple jobs/projects that you need to keep organized. We work with multiple job types from print/creative to web, copy and digital ads so it helps us stay organized. I don't think it would be suitable for a company that doesn't have a lot of jobs to manage. We average over 1,200 requests a year.
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • All in one communication for Teams.
  • High quality and reliable both audio and video meetings.
  • Well organized and clear instant chat.
  • Excellent security features.
  • Beautiful integration with 3rd party tools and systems.
  • Perfect compatibility with windows ,android and iOS.
  • Allow meetings recordings for later us or sharing with teams that missed the live.
Read full review
Wrike
  • Excellent dashboards that are easy to use and give amazing insights.
  • User friendly interface that is also easy to interact with.
  • Lot of integrations.
  • Robust project and task management features.
  • Facilitate seamless team collaboration and communication.
  • Highly customizable and multiple project views.
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • The webinars feature has some missing functionally such as the ability for all users to use the Q&A feature (only those with a Microsoft Teams account can use it now), the ability to upload documents for attendees to easily access and download, and the ability for presenters and organizers to easily chat amongst themselves throughout the webinar.
  • The "Channels" organization hierarchy could be more clear. If you have several channels set up, it can get clunky and hard to find the specific channel you are looking for.
  • The MS Planner tool lacks functionality and organization. You cannot assign more than one person to a task and it's confusing when you try to share tasks with people - it would be nice if they were automatically added to someone's calendar.
Read full review
Wrike
  • Email alerts sometimes send too slowly.
  • If you put a project on hold, it can be hard to find it once you are ready to return to it.
  • Sometimes there are too many steps/tasks and the main page can get cluttered.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Microsoft
Microsoft Teams is included with our Office 365 subscription and we have no intention of migrating off of Office 365 and Microsoft products. Since Microsoft Teams is included for free with our Office 365 subscription, and since we enjoy all the features, benefits, and functionality, there is no question that our team will continue to use the product
Read full review
Wrike
I wish that Wrike had more drag and drop functionality that would be connected to assignee and also I wish that the finish date of a task would update to the date where you checked completed. It does not do that. Also finishing a task doesn't move the start date of the next task it "protects your time in that way", but our management team wants us to quickly see what we have down the pipeline rather than having to scroll down the list of upcoming tasks.
Read full review
Usability
Microsoft
If you have the full Microsoft Office suite, it works really well because it's integrated well within its ecosystem, but if not, it can be annoying because it tries to open a shared file in the web versions of the file equivalents. The web version is also a bit slow, and the login is very difficult to handle if you have multiple Microsoft or Outlook accounts.
Read full review
Wrike
It does take some time and work to really understand and use it properly, but I think the accessibility to help and documentation make that completely feasible. Once you know how to use it, I find it to be very user-friendly, and have very few complaints.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Microsoft
Rare, but outages do happen
Read full review
Wrike
Over two years of (almost) daily usage without outages. Don't remember any errors. I give it 9 only because some Wrike plugins (for online document edit) are based on NPAPI architecture. These types of plugins are being phased out in new browsers, and NPAPI plugins are disabled by default in recent versions of Chrome so you have to do some browser adjustments when you switch browsers or move to another computer.
Read full review
Performance
Microsoft
Sometimes about once a week I get a message that says "Sorry, there seems to be something wrong". But it goes away in a few minutes.
Read full review
Wrike
Wrike tasks loads fine, but I hate clicking files and wait for a bit of time since it is powerpoint or word, Wrike assumes I want to open those on Wrike. My suggestion is to link it to office 365 so we do not need Wrike based decoder for PPTX and DOCX
Read full review
Support Rating
Microsoft
The overall support provided by Microsoft for Microsoft Teams has been quite good but there is still some room for improvements. Microsoft needs to proactively work on fixing the open bugs in order to provide a seamless experience to the users. But over the service and experience provided by the Microsoft team have been quite satisfactory.
Read full review
Wrike
During my learning phase with Wrike, I initially struggled with setting up automation rules and request forms. However, Wrike support was always my go-to, resolving issues within seconds or minutes. Their assistance made the learning process much easier. My best experience was receiving step-by-step screenshots to follow, with the support team on standby until I was completely satisfied.
Read full review
In-Person Training
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Wrike
We had staff in person provide some training
Read full review
Online Training
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Wrike
I love the Wrike training options. Wrike Discover has tons of courses, learning plans, certifications, etc. This is an area where Wrike definitely shines! I wish these resources were more in your face for new people, because it seems like a lot of coworkers didn't know all of this training was available to them.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Microsoft
I find everything I need for my day-to-day work.
Read full review
Wrike
There are a lot of bells and whistles in Wrike, and not all of it is easy or intuitive to understand once it's plopped in your lap. It's easier when there are a few choice people who understand Wrike as a platform and articulate it in such a way where it makes it easy to pass it along to others in the group
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
Microsoft Teams offers a much more integrated experience between their chat and video call function compared to Google Chat and Slack. Both other tools are much better for internal communications are they have simpler UI without other features. Whereas Microsoft Teams can be used for more critical conversations, particularly between external companies, and has been very useful in sales conversations which is what we chose it for when speaking to companies that work exclusively through Microsoft.
Read full review
Wrike
Jira did not at all help us get our work done as content creators. I think that was because Jira wasn't quite right for our uses. Wrike fits our needs so much better. I can't tell you enough the relief I felt when we adopted Wrike and I never had to use Jira again.
Read full review
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
Microsoft
Honestly, this tool is worth every penny. Yes, it's not free and you pay for the quality of services and the license. But the ROI and the benefits are all there. Also, the renewal, negotiation, and contract terms are all very well explained by our Microsoft account manager, and she's a charm.
Read full review
Wrike
company purchase
Read full review
Scalability
Microsoft
It does not appear to have a limit to how many teams and employees we can have using it
Read full review
Wrike
The sky is the limit for what can be done in Wrike. We started with 1 use case and within 5 months we migrated several key business practices over to Wrike because they were easier to manage. Use cases so far: process improvement, management review, corrective actions, maintenance requests, month-end financial closing, and document management. As we grow, it's easy to imagine putting even more into Wrike where it becomes a cornerstone for how we do business
Read full review
Professional Services
Microsoft
I used Skype for Business to take calls, hold conferences, and provide remote assistance to users. Microsoft Teams, on the other hand, is superior to Skype for Business in my opinion. My job entails a lot of screen sharing.
Read full review
Wrike
I do not use professional services.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • Personally, I would say that by using Microsoft Teams, it upped my collaboration with my colleagues by around 50% or around more than half of what I usually did prior to using it.
  • I had 100% show rate and attendance on all of my meetings in the past 6 months.
  • If I may add, I also have been chattier & collaborative towards my colleagues in past 3 months particularly the month of December when we had huge traffic at work. I would estimate this behavior to have been increased by around 60% than what I usually incur during normal operating days.
Read full review
Wrike
  • Different teams (e.g., contracting, compliance, provider relations) can view updates in real time, comment directly on tasks, and escalate items when needed.
  • Wrike allows us to template the contracting process (from intake to signature) to ensure consistency across payers and reduce administrative overhead.
  • Leadership can see the status of negotiations at a glance, identify bottlenecks, and prioritize resources accordingly.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Wrike Screenshots

Screenshot of DashboardsScreenshot of DashboardsScreenshot of DashboardsScreenshot of DashboardsScreenshot of Space workflowsScreenshot of Space workflows