Microsoft Teams combines video conferencing software with team collaboration tools. The communications platform allows MS Office users to conduct conference calls and share files via SharePoint, and join or initiate a group chat.
$4.80
per month per user
Wrike
Score 8.5 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Wrike is a project management and collaboration software. This solution connects tasks, discussions, and emails to the user’s project plan. Wrike is optimized for agile workflows and aims to help resolve data silos, poor visibility into work status, and missed deadlines and project failures.
$240
per year 2 users (minimum)
Pricing
Microsoft Teams
Wrike
Editions & Modules
Microsoft Teams Essentials
$4.80
per month per user
Microsoft Teams Enterprise
$5.25
per month (paid yearly) per user
Microsoft Teams Enterprise
$5.25
per month per user
Microsoft 365 Business Basic
$7.20
per month per user
Microsoft 365 Business Standard
$15
per month per user
Wrike Free
$0
per month per user
Wrike Team
$10
per month (billed annually) per user (2-15 users)
Wrike Business
$25
per month (billed annually) per user (5-200 users)
Apex
Request a quote
per month per user
Pinnacle
Request a quote
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Microsoft Teams
Wrike
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
Discounts are available for non profit organizations.
Every premium plan begins with a 14-day trial period.
Asana is easier to use compared to Wrike having a steeper learning curve. However, be not afraid, you will be getting that value in a couple of months.
We looked at multiple produce, specifically Microsoft Project and Clarizen Go. Wrike had the customization we needed along with the support staff and training to implement the product. The user interface is great with many views available, including custom views. The built-in …
Verified User
Employee
Chose Wrike
The features and automations in Wrike definitely overshadow the previous tools I've used. I think Asana has a slightly better visual appeal to it and I found navigation simpler vs Wrike but how detailed you can get with a tool like Wrike is unparalleled. Basecamp was actually …
Simply back then, Wrike was the cheapest alternative to what we needed out of a tool. So we commited to it back almost 10 years ago and are still working with them. Many core business processes are now within Wrike which has manifested its right to exist within our company.
I could list a ton more... but in reality, what has been a nice trend in this industry is that the top competing platforms with Wrike, all have adapted and added very similar features, things that didn't exist 5 years ago, are commonplace today among these listed. I would say, …
Verified User
Employee
Chose Wrike
Notion is more for an individual task list, and Slack is all about communication, whereas Wrike is a mix of both, with better status updates.
It does everything better in terms of organization and workflow. But, Slack has built in call. It's the only missing peace for Wrike. If I could call people from Wrike, it will remove the need of team and other call platform. But for the rest, Wrike feels to me like the better …
Wrike is completely customizable. I began my project management tool in Monday, but really established myself when I switched to ClickUp. I felt like I wanted to keep some similarities to how I worked in ClickUp when our company made the switch to Wrike, and I was able to mimic …
We use both monday.com and Wrike. While Monday does have a better user interface, Wrike allows us to have more visibility into tasks where multiple people are collaborating. And also to receive project brief-ins and requests for new projects. We use both differently and I would …
Wrike has everything and all the information in one place which is really nice. with other platforms you have to use multiple apps at once and it can get overwhelming.
I like Wrike best. I liked Asana, but I think it got too pricey for the features that we wanted out of it. Notion was fine, but I think its ability to integrate with the rest of our tech stack proved difficult. Trello was fine, it was early in my career and I remember its ease …
In the past, I've used other project management products like Asana, Flow, Kantata, and Microsoft Project. While all have similar options and end goals in mind, Wrike is the most seamless and effective, regardless of platform—browser, desktop app, or mobile app. It's the most …
We chose Wrike after careful software selection with three other products. The goal is to identify and define a working standard for greater efficiency during the definition, planning, execution, monitoring, and finalization of products. Wrike proved to be the best and easiest …
Wrike always works - it's always up-to-date, never down, and our one source of truth. I wish the mobile version of Wrike was more usable, but that's the only thing where Wrike may not be the front runner.
Wrike is a unique and wholesome tool that would provide you with all the views like Smartsheet and also all the required features for agile work management like JIRA. However these are tools probably are great at what they do in specific areas and Wrike has not yet just …
We had only evaluated Monday and Asana on a surface level before we chose Wrike, so never went to try a trial, but from what we saw in terms of functionality and customizability they both didn't seem to match up with our varied needs as a very diverse company dealing with …
Compared to other project management software we have used, Wrike is easy to implement and garner user acceptance. Other applications we have used and complex to configure and maintain, whereas Wrike is intuitive and simple to understand out of the gate. The communication …
Verified User
Manager
Chose Wrike
We moved from excel trackers and SharePoint Classic forms/lists to Wrike. We were never able to create a branching logic request form so it was long and cumbersome. We had to manually put together excel sheets from several sources to report out our work so leadership had little …
Wrike has better customization and integrations Flexibility to give different access depending on what it is needed. Spaces provide independence for each Team to set up what they need Open to feedback from users and implementing changes suggested by users Learning material …
Features
Microsoft Teams
Wrike
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Teams
7.8
233 Ratings
0% above category average
Wrike
8.0
909 Ratings
3% above category average
Task Management
7.8172 Ratings
9.1900 Ratings
Gantt Charts
7.590 Ratings
7.9634 Ratings
Scheduling
7.9200 Ratings
8.3788 Ratings
Workflow Automation
8.0120 Ratings
8.0777 Ratings
Mobile Access
8.1221 Ratings
7.8655 Ratings
Search
7.3204 Ratings
00 Ratings
Visual planning tools
8.3137 Ratings
00 Ratings
Resource Management
00 Ratings
7.8773 Ratings
Team Collaboration
00 Ratings
8.6900 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology
00 Ratings
7.7502 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology
00 Ratings
7.9452 Ratings
Document Management
00 Ratings
7.6756 Ratings
Email integration
00 Ratings
7.8680 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking
00 Ratings
7.7426 Ratings
Change request and Case Management
00 Ratings
7.723 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management
00 Ratings
7.6325 Ratings
Communication
Comparison of Communication features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Teams
7.9
242 Ratings
1% below category average
Wrike
-
Ratings
Chat
8.9241 Ratings
00 Ratings
Notifications
8.2240 Ratings
00 Ratings
Discussions
8.5227 Ratings
00 Ratings
Surveys
8.0138 Ratings
00 Ratings
Internal knowledgebase
8.5151 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integrates with GoToMeeting
6.547 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integrates with Gmail and Google Hangouts
5.743 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integrates with Outlook
9.1155 Ratings
00 Ratings
File Sharing & Management
Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Teams
8.0
227 Ratings
0% below category average
Wrike
-
Ratings
Versioning
8.4160 Ratings
00 Ratings
Video files
8.2194 Ratings
00 Ratings
Audio files
8.6193 Ratings
00 Ratings
Document collaboration
8.7207 Ratings
00 Ratings
Access control
8.5189 Ratings
00 Ratings
Advanced security features
8.3149 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integrates with Google Drive
5.353 Ratings
00 Ratings
Device sync
8.4163 Ratings
00 Ratings
Professional Services Automation
Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Teams excels highly in providing seamless communication and collaboration across teams working both on-site and remotely from different locations. Its capabilities for chat, meetings, file sharing, calling, etc., on a single platform meet all collaboration and meeting needs an organization requires. Also, provide complete features of running group calls and conferences.
I think that Wrike is customizable enough to fit most needs, so I would generally recommend it as a starting point to anyone that is looking for a project management tool. Some people on my team don't like it, but I think that is moreso due to lack of exposure than any flaws in the tool itself. I predominately taught myself many of the features, and I found it to be straightforward. There is lots of great documentation out there, plus the community forums are incredible helpful as well. Wrike might not be THE perfect tool for every single need, but I think that there would be very few situations where it would ultimately be incompatible with a team's workflow needs.
The webinars feature has some missing functionally such as the ability for all users to use the Q&A feature (only those with a Microsoft Teams account can use it now), the ability to upload documents for attendees to easily access and download, and the ability for presenters and organizers to easily chat amongst themselves throughout the webinar.
The "Channels" organization hierarchy could be more clear. If you have several channels set up, it can get clunky and hard to find the specific channel you are looking for.
The MS Planner tool lacks functionality and organization. You cannot assign more than one person to a task and it's confusing when you try to share tasks with people - it would be nice if they were automatically added to someone's calendar.
Microsoft Teams is included with our Office 365 subscription and we have no intention of migrating off of Office 365 and Microsoft products. Since Microsoft Teams is included for free with our Office 365 subscription, and since we enjoy all the features, benefits, and functionality, there is no question that our team will continue to use the product
I wish that Wrike had more drag and drop functionality that would be connected to assignee and also I wish that the finish date of a task would update to the date where you checked completed. It does not do that. Also finishing a task doesn't move the start date of the next task it "protects your time in that way", but our management team wants us to quickly see what we have down the pipeline rather than having to scroll down the list of upcoming tasks.
If you have the full Microsoft Office suite, it works really well because it's integrated well within its ecosystem, but if not, it can be annoying because it tries to open a shared file in the web versions of the file equivalents. The web version is also a bit slow, and the login is very difficult to handle if you have multiple Microsoft or Outlook accounts.
It's easy as pie to use. I don't have any issues and only the oldest, most un-tech savvy of coworkers on my team seems to have issues with it. It's quick to pick up, intuitive, and effective. I have no criticism for it.
Over two years of (almost) daily usage without outages. Don't remember any errors. I give it 9 only because some Wrike plugins (for online document edit) are based on NPAPI architecture. These types of plugins are being phased out in new browsers, and NPAPI plugins are disabled by default in recent versions of Chrome so you have to do some browser adjustments when you switch browsers or move to another computer.
Wrike tasks loads fine, but I hate clicking files and wait for a bit of time since it is powerpoint or word, Wrike assumes I want to open those on Wrike. My suggestion is to link it to office 365 so we do not need Wrike based decoder for PPTX and DOCX
The overall support provided by Microsoft for Microsoft Teams has been quite good but there is still some room for improvements. Microsoft needs to proactively work on fixing the open bugs in order to provide a seamless experience to the users. But over the service and experience provided by the Microsoft team have been quite satisfactory.
During my learning phase with Wrike, I initially struggled with setting up automation rules and request forms. However, Wrike support was always my go-to, resolving issues within seconds or minutes. Their assistance made the learning process much easier. My best experience was receiving step-by-step screenshots to follow, with the support team on standby until I was completely satisfied.
I love the Wrike training options. Wrike Discover has tons of courses, learning plans, certifications, etc. This is an area where Wrike definitely shines! I wish these resources were more in your face for new people, because it seems like a lot of coworkers didn't know all of this training was available to them.
There are a lot of bells and whistles in Wrike, and not all of it is easy or intuitive to understand once it's plopped in your lap. It's easier when there are a few choice people who understand Wrike as a platform and articulate it in such a way where it makes it easy to pass it along to others in the group
Microsoft Teams offers a much more integrated experience between their chat and video call function compared to Google Chat and Slack. Both other tools are much better for internal communications are they have simpler UI without other features. Whereas Microsoft Teams can be used for more critical conversations, particularly between external companies, and has been very useful in sales conversations which is what we chose it for when speaking to companies that work exclusively through Microsoft.
We use both monday.com and Wrike. While Monday does have a better user interface, Wrike allows us to have more visibility into tasks where multiple people are collaborating. And also to receive project brief-ins and requests for new projects. We use both differently and I would say for us Wrike is more the collaboration tool than the day to day individual task management tool - and it works great.
Honestly, this tool is worth every penny. Yes, it's not free and you pay for the quality of services and the license. But the ROI and the benefits are all there. Also, the renewal, negotiation, and contract terms are all very well explained by our Microsoft account manager, and she's a charm.
The sky is the limit for what can be done in Wrike. We started with 1 use case and within 5 months we migrated several key business practices over to Wrike because they were easier to manage. Use cases so far: process improvement, management review, corrective actions, maintenance requests, month-end financial closing, and document management. As we grow, it's easy to imagine putting even more into Wrike where it becomes a cornerstone for how we do business
I used Skype for Business to take calls, hold conferences, and provide remote assistance to users. Microsoft Teams, on the other hand, is superior to Skype for Business in my opinion. My job entails a lot of screen sharing.
Different teams (e.g., contracting, compliance, provider relations) can view updates in real time, comment directly on tasks, and escalate items when needed.
Wrike allows us to template the contracting process (from intake to signature) to ensure consistency across payers and reduce administrative overhead.
Leadership can see the status of negotiations at a glance, identify bottlenecks, and prioritize resources accordingly.