MS SharePoint / SQL vs. Oracle Analytics Server

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
MS SharePoint / SQL
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
MS SharePoint / SQL refers to Microsoft Sharepoint, a web-based collaborative platform, being used in tandem with Microsoft SQL Server to provide business intelligence analytics and reporting. They can provide BI content such as data connections, reports, scorecards, dashboards, and more.N/A
Oracle Analytics Server
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
Oracle Analytics Server, replacing the former Oracle BI Foundation Suite is a business intelligence reporting and analytics platform. It provides users with a series of integrated tools for ad-hoc query and analysis, dashboard and scorecard creation, enterprise reporting, mobile analytics, multidimensional OLAP, and predictive analytics.N/A
Pricing
MS SharePoint / SQLOracle Analytics Server
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
MS SharePoint / SQLOracle Analytics Server
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details—Must contact sales team for pricing.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
MS SharePoint / SQLOracle Analytics Server
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
MS SharePoint / SQLOracle Analytics Server
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
MS SharePoint / SQL
8.9
55 Ratings
8% above category average
Oracle Analytics Server
8.4
38 Ratings
2% above category average
Pixel Perfect reports8.936 Ratings8.934 Ratings
Customizable dashboards8.753 Ratings9.237 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates9.145 Ratings7.138 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
MS SharePoint / SQL
9.1
52 Ratings
12% above category average
Oracle Analytics Server
8.2
38 Ratings
1% above category average
Drill-down analysis8.942 Ratings8.437 Ratings
Formatting capabilities9.652 Ratings8.138 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages8.030 Ratings7.124 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration9.850 Ratings9.237 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
MS SharePoint / SQL
9.1
56 Ratings
9% above category average
Oracle Analytics Server
9.1
38 Ratings
9% above category average
Publish to Web8.852 Ratings8.732 Ratings
Publish to PDF8.048 Ratings9.238 Ratings
Report Versioning8.845 Ratings9.030 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling9.740 Ratings9.836 Ratings
Delivery to Remote Servers10.032 Ratings8.618 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
MS SharePoint / SQL
9.2
34 Ratings
13% above category average
Oracle Analytics Server
8.5
37 Ratings
5% above category average
Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)8.933 Ratings9.036 Ratings
Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization10.032 Ratings8.532 Ratings
Predictive Analytics10.029 Ratings8.127 Ratings
Pattern Recognition and Data Mining8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Access Control and Security
Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Product A and Product B
MS SharePoint / SQL
9.3
67 Ratings
8% above category average
Oracle Analytics Server
8.8
38 Ratings
2% above category average
Multi-User Support (named login)10.059 Ratings9.238 Ratings
Role-Based Security Model9.062 Ratings8.238 Ratings
Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)9.666 Ratings8.537 Ratings
Report-Level Access Control9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Single Sign-On (SSO)9.053 Ratings9.321 Ratings
Mobile Capabilities
Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Product A and Product B
MS SharePoint / SQL
9.2
57 Ratings
14% above category average
Oracle Analytics Server
7.3
30 Ratings
9% below category average
Responsive Design for Web Access9.754 Ratings6.730 Ratings
Mobile Application9.133 Ratings7.326 Ratings
Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile8.038 Ratings7.528 Ratings
Application Program Interfaces (APIs) / Embedding
Comparison of Application Program Interfaces (APIs) / Embedding features of Product A and Product B
MS SharePoint / SQL
9.3
37 Ratings
16% above category average
Oracle Analytics Server
7.7
18 Ratings
3% below category average
REST API9.028 Ratings7.915 Ratings
Javascript API9.926 Ratings9.016 Ratings
iFrames9.027 Ratings6.614 Ratings
Java API9.025 Ratings9.715 Ratings
Themeable User Interface (UI)9.032 Ratings7.114 Ratings
Customizable Platform (Open Source)9.923 Ratings5.913 Ratings
Best Alternatives
MS SharePoint / SQLOracle Analytics Server
Small Businesses
BrightGauge
BrightGauge
Score 8.9 out of 10
BrightGauge
BrightGauge
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Reveal
Reveal
Score 9.9 out of 10
Reveal
Reveal
Score 9.9 out of 10
Enterprises
Jaspersoft Community Edition
Jaspersoft Community Edition
Score 9.7 out of 10
Jaspersoft Community Edition
Jaspersoft Community Edition
Score 9.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
MS SharePoint / SQLOracle Analytics Server
Likelihood to Recommend
8.8
(74 ratings)
9.2
(45 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.8
(7 ratings)
9.1
(8 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(7 ratings)
9.1
(2 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
8.8
(7 ratings)
9.1
(3 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Implementation Rating
7.0
(2 ratings)
9.1
(3 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
MS SharePoint / SQLOracle Analytics Server
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
A simple and important scenario well suited is that you can configure alerts to notify you when the production server fails. another best feature is the report server is the central component of reporting services. For me something less appropriate is that the admin must ensure optimal performance for farm operations, they recommend that you install SQL Server on a dedicated server that does not run other farm roles and does not host databases for other applications.
Read full review
Oracle
The entire deployment and configuration stage was easy and it was accessible across the organization in a matter of days. Oracle Analytics Server being a cloud-based solution helped right from Input of Bulk Data to Info preparation, Data cleaning, and finally Data Modeling. Everything was visual and the Help Wizard was very intuitive.
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • Flexible - able to make any changes we would like vs traditional service desk system.
  • ROI - We were already using SharePoint for internal intranet, so we are simply getting more use out of licensing we had already committed to.
  • Easy to use for end users.
Read full review
Oracle
  • Oracle helps with easy customization of reports.
  • It helps with the creation of dashboards and the integration of different data sources.
  • Oracle BI was a package used for multiple users across our organization - publishing and distributing reports was a breeze.
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • It is hard to setup and nightmare
  • It requires a of infrastructure, thus it could be costly because of requirement and licensing required for everything to run smoothly
  • If it is not setup and organized properly from the beginning it could be maintenance nightmare
  • It is hard to have "test" environment to do patches or similar
Read full review
Oracle
  • More AI but with human back up.
  • Less mumbo jumbo so even IT guys/gals can more easily work.
  • More statistics (math) and orientation for those not familiar with it.
  • More live as well as virtual (live) show casing of real situations in business.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Microsoft
This was a long-term buy-in from a corporate perspective, to remain in the SharePoint space. Migration is certainly possible, which is good for planning and having options further out. At this point, the only planned migration is to eventually move the architecture up to SharePoint/SQL 2013. At that point, we will be able to leverage some greater efficiencies, some enhanced content design and management features, and some more current social features. It is well worth a full consideration in any shop looking at a new implementation of or migration to SharePoint (although you will probably be considering 2013 versions or beyond in those discussions), but the platform should be a strong competitor to any alternatives. Realizing the capability of a fully-branded and customized website was not part of the original choice for the architecture at Lincoln, but seeing it implemented and functioning now with this capacity far beyond original expectations has certainly cemented plans to continue using it.
Read full review
Oracle
Scalability and rich integration capabilities. In the future, if we go with Hyperion for the Financial Consolidation and planning purposes -BI integration with Hyperion is going to be much simpler as it has native interface connectivity and even integration capabilities with well known CRM products (Siebel) and ERP Products (Oracle EBS, Peoplesoft, SAP) is going to be easy and straight forward.
Read full review
Usability
Microsoft
SharePoint is very complex. This makes usability somewhat difficult from an IT perspective. An IT generalist will be able to pick it up and run with basic tasks. More customized functions would require significant specialized training and therefore limit what a standard user would be able to achieve. From an end user perspective, it's pretty straightforward to use.
Read full review
Oracle
For me or a staff memeber that uses it frequently, its usability is sufficient. However newbies could have a few issues but find their workflow
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Oracle
No problems, it's that simple.
Read full review
Performance
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Oracle
Other than anomalies or expected quirks, there were never any earth-shattering delays.
Read full review
Support Rating
Microsoft
It's been fantastic in terms of Premier Support so far. If there is an issue and if you report if the product has an issue, they will act upon it immediately. In some cases, if you design/develop something using the platform, Microsoft appreciates it and... publishes it on their public website. But you have to wait for some time if it is a non-Premier Support issue as you may experience delays.
Read full review
Oracle
It's fast, efficient and easy to work with. Scheduling could help when planning out a day however overall it's a big plus when rolling out and supporting Oracle.
Read full review
In-Person Training
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Oracle
Oracle University offers very in-depth training.
Read full review
Online Training
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Oracle
It was a private training site.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Microsoft
Not implemented in best practice way, there are many customizations
Read full review
Oracle
A properly implemented Endeca solution performs extremely well on the largest of datasets and it positions your organization to immediately achieve your ROI.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
At the time of the two large projects, SharePoint was the enterprise solution so we were required to use that. We have since lobbied the enterprise teams to review and consider Atlassian Confluence and were successful. Confluence is cheaper than Sharepoint which is why we wanted to bring that in. The enterprise has now made Confluence an enterprise solution as an alternative to SharePoint. After using both I think SharePoint has many more add-ins than Confluence. It has much more customization ability than Confluence. SharePoint is not good for mobile readiness. Confluence is so there is a difference that might lead you to Confluence over SharePoint. I would also say that SharePoint is very document-centric and that Confluence has better KM than SharePoint does. even with the use of SQL Server. We were told that we could not use Google Drive even though it had features we liked.
Read full review
Oracle
Oracle BI works pretty well and has been well acknowledged and appreciated by the business users and power users who develop reports and dashboards. Compared to other tools, Oracle BI object development is easier and has a quick turnout. Using Oracle BI with Essbase and Oracle Exadata db, we believe the performance rendering data is quite good. We are using MicroStrategy as well almost equally, but for critical reporting needs considering the back end is Oracle and Oracle Financial Services Analytical Applications (OFSAA) we have chosen OBIEE.
Read full review
Scalability
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Oracle
We have seen the results of this in our initial research and are not surprised that Oracle does this like it does soo many other things in this area, so well.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • I've installed SharePoint in many different industries and each industry has seen greater collaboration among their teams both locally and nationally. The ability to collaborate more efficiently has reduced the need to have employees centrally located.
  • Companies which have used SharePoint in a end user training portal have had great ROI, since they can create the content once and share with all their users who subscribe to their training service. The web content management aspect of SharePoint is a very helpful feature.
Read full review
Oracle
  • We've used OBIEE (or it's previous named product) for over 13 years and it's still the most used tool for BI by the business.
  • We moved our largest business system off of Business Object into OBI so we could gain improved performance, reliability, and easier management of metadata.
Read full review
ScreenShots