Likelihood to Recommend SiteScope is definitely well suited in an HP server environment. It is also well suited for virtual server environments. It is also well suited for those who are happy with email and text based message alerting. It may not be appropriate in other environments where monitoring physical components is critical. Because HP SiteScope does not monitor certain physical components, it does fall short of being able to be a "one stop shop solution" in regard to monitoring. It is not well suited for those looking for logic in how alerts are sent and cascade to other people or groups.
Read full review Good for below cases 1. There is a front end and need to correlate data with front end data 2. multiple microservices and need to check the health of each system 3. correlate data from various sources 4. Application performance is a key to be captured 5. application performance is a key metric.
Read full review Pros Alerts can be configured as per business requirement. It can take remedial action, when defined for a particular situation. Severity, priority of tickets which are created upon a trigger can be well defined. The teams which need to be alerted can be configured in the tool itself, in case of any event. Read full review Detect and Troubleshoot, which allows team to eliminate errors. Dashboard creates a one stop location for environment health Provides visibility, access to logs and user data real time. Read full review Cons Sitescope is particularly used for infrastructure monitoring. Other kinds of monitors cannot be set using HP sitescope. Sitescope cannot have graphs like splunk which is why we have splunk as well which is an additional cost for the company. We can't have a direct regex operations on data inside HP sitescope. We need to have the logs placed as a single log and then do that. Read full review I wish Splunk Application Performance Monitoring could integrate with packet capture and analysis tools and provide the integrated analysis results on each tier of the application Read full review Usability Very straightforward and easy to use once you get past the short learning curve.
Read full review Splunk is a great tool for log mining. It is less time-consuming and easy to use. It provides high security, it has customisable dashboards. Furthermore, it acts as a search head, and it gives real-time status. It has the ability to collect data from any source and multiple sources, and it can correlate them.
Read full review Support Rating Can't really answer this. Setup was easy and no support has really been used at this point.
Read full review Alternatives Considered SiteScope unified console is a powerful tool for operators to easily detect warnings and alerts grouped by its hierarchical organization with real-time status displaying continuously the whole health map.
Read full review It is good that the correlation analysis and the cause of the failure can be analyzed more extensively through the collection of many data. It is good because it provides a user interface (usability) well and can be used conveniently. It is good because it can utilize anomaly detection through various AI-based ML models.
Read full review Return on Investment Sitescope does exactly what it was purchased for. It may take some time to set it up but once its set up it is a rock solid product. Read full review It gave us more quicker alerts in a organize way to distribute to specific audience. Helped us to improve our uptime by getting pro-active alerts via emails More collaboration in a DevOps culture Read full review ScreenShots