Oracle WebCenter Content is Oracle's ECM Suite. This product is tightly integrated to other Oracle products and provides ECM functionality to Siebel CRM and PeopleSoft. The WebCenter product family also includes Oracle's CMS (WebCenter Sites) which they acquired from FatWire.
N/A
RWS Tridion Sites
Score9 out of 10
N/A
RWS Tridion Sites provides web content management capabilities, connecting people, processes, and information across teams, brands, and markets, to deliver impactful online experiences globally. RWS Tridion Sites' DPX platform enables the use of either traditional or headless publishing. It includes advanced features such as automated personalization, multilingual capabilities and Semantic AI. The BluePrinting® technology at the core of RWS Tridion Sites simplifies reuse and…
N/A
Pricing
Oracle WebCenter Content
RWS Tridion Sites
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Oracle WebCenter Content
RWS Tridion Sites
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Oracle WebCenter Content
RWS Tridion Sites
Enterprise Content Management
Comparison of Enterprise Content Management features of Oracle WebCenter Content and RWS Tridion Sites
Feature
Oracle WebCenter Content
7.6
4 Ratings
6% below category average
RWS Tridion Sites
-
Ratings
Content capture & imaging
7.94 Ratings
00 Ratings
File sync, storage & archiving
8.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Document management
8.64 Ratings
00 Ratings
Records management
7.24 Ratings
00 Ratings
Content search & retrieval
8.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Enterprise content collaboration
9.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Content publishing & creation
6.93 Ratings
00 Ratings
Security, risk management & information governance
7.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract lifecycle management
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Automated workflows
7.12 Ratings
00 Ratings
Artificial intelligence
6.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integration
8.72 Ratings
00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Oracle WebCenter Content and RWS Tridion Sites
Feature
Oracle WebCenter Content
-
Ratings
RWS Tridion Sites
9.0
9 Ratings
9% above category average
Role-based user permissions
00 Ratings
9.09 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Oracle WebCenter Content and RWS Tridion Sites
Feature
Oracle WebCenter Content
-
Ratings
RWS Tridion Sites
9.1
8 Ratings
15% above category average
API
00 Ratings
8.36 Ratings
Internationalization / multi-language
00 Ratings
10.07 Ratings
Web Content Creation
Comparison of Web Content Creation features of Oracle WebCenter Content and RWS Tridion Sites
Feature
Oracle WebCenter Content
-
Ratings
RWS Tridion Sites
8.5
8 Ratings
8% above category average
WYSIWYG editor
00 Ratings
8.08 Ratings
Code quality / cleanliness
00 Ratings
8.07 Ratings
Admin section
00 Ratings
9.08 Ratings
Page templates
00 Ratings
9.08 Ratings
Library of website themes
00 Ratings
8.24 Ratings
Mobile optimization / responsive design
00 Ratings
9.07 Ratings
Publishing workflow
00 Ratings
9.08 Ratings
Form generator
00 Ratings
8.33 Ratings
Web Content Management
Comparison of Web Content Management features of Oracle WebCenter Content and RWS Tridion Sites
WebCenter Content is suitable for payables invoice processing for companies with a huge volume of paper invoices. 80% of data entry effort can be reduced. For small companies with less volume, WebCenter may not make sense. WebCenter is not perfect. It has some issues. We raised enhancement requests with Oracle, hopefully, Oracle will resolve them soon.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Love the product and I really like how we use it for public sites. The only negative aspect is that it is just hard to find Tridion devs that understand the tool, grasp .net, react, and understand the blueprint, etc.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Tridion is complicated in enough ways that it makes it difficult to train new users. Therefore, we have to limit the number of people with access to the system since we have not yet implemented Workflow.
When something goes wrong (items fail to publish, or there is unexpected behavior with components), there is little explanation provided that would point us in the right direction to troubleshoot. As a result, content Authors and Editors have to frequently ask for IT assistance.
The challenges with converting to a completely new system create quite a barrier to switching to anything else. If we find another system that offers guaranteed improvements to the user interface -- as well as as a more coherent set of options for data interchanges with current and future enterprise data sources -- we would be more interested in swithing to that new product. Of course, the expense in purchasing competitor system, along with the costs of migrating all current content, along with retooling all existing workflows in place, would be carefully weighed against the benefits incurred from a switch-over.
I am giving this a semi-high rating because we have already got Tridion up and running and we are still in the process of moving the sites over to Tridion. It is unlikely we will be moving things to a new CMS AGAIN in the near future as the cost to get Tridion was high.
The editor user interface is very user friendly and in-site editing makes simple updates fast and easy. The extensibility of Tridion is a big plus and the ability to add our own options into the default Tridion interface helps us integrate with external systems. Finally, the user permissions and security system helps us deploy it within our large organization.
I can't really provide an answer for this question because I think the basic premise is flawed. Which system an organization selects is based (or should be based) on their unique business and organizational requirements, not the features of the system. We do not recommend a particular solution to a client based on subjective preference for one system over another but rather for its appropriateness to achieve a particular goal or collection of goals.
It is a nuclear missile compared to the other handguns and knives on the market today. But it also requires nuclear technicians and expertise that a handgun doesn't require. Do you need to decimate your competition and you have the investment capabilities necessary to put a nuclear missile into the sky? Then definitely do it. Especially if you need a very good multi-lingual blueprint provider like Tridion.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We were looking for a scalable solution for invoice processing needs. WebCenter did fit the bill. It reduced manual data entry effort by 80%.
WebCenter saved our storage costs. We do not need to store the physical paper copies anymore in our expensive offices.
WebCenter increased the employee engagement and reduced monotonous data entry work. Employees now have time to spend on value-added work rather than data entry.
Auditors were happy with the tool, as they can retrieve any document with the click of a button as opposed to search and find a physical document.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info