TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Oracle WebCenter Content vs. RWS Tridion Sites

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Oracle WebCenter Content

    Score9.4 out of 10
    N/AOracle WebCenter Content is Oracle's ECM Suite. This product is tightly integrated to other Oracle products and provides ECM functionality to Siebel CRM and PeopleSoft. The WebCenter product family also includes Oracle's CMS (WebCenter Sites) which they acquired from FatWire.N/A

    RWS Tridion Sites

    Score9 out of 10
    N/ARWS Tridion Sites provides web content management capabilities, connecting people, processes, and information across teams, brands, and markets, to deliver impactful online experiences globally. RWS Tridion Sites' DPX platform enables the use of either traditional or headless publishing. It includes advanced features such as automated personalization, multilingual capabilities and Semantic AI. The BluePrinting® technology at the core of RWS Tridion Sites simplifies reuse and…N/A
    Pricing
    Oracle WebCenter ContentRWS Tridion Sites
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Oracle WebCenter ContentRWS Tridion Sites
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    Oracle WebCenter ContentRWS Tridion Sites
    Enterprise Content Management
    Comparison of Enterprise Content Management features of Oracle WebCenter Content and RWS Tridion Sites
    Feature
    Oracle WebCenter Content
    7.6
    4 Ratings
    6% below category average
    RWS Tridion Sites
    -
    Ratings
    Content capture & imaging7.94 Ratings00 Ratings
    File sync, storage & archiving8.04 Ratings00 Ratings
    Document management8.64 Ratings00 Ratings
    Records management7.24 Ratings00 Ratings
    Content search & retrieval8.04 Ratings00 Ratings
    Enterprise content collaboration9.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Content publishing & creation6.93 Ratings00 Ratings
    Security, risk management & information governance7.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Contract lifecycle management7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Automated workflows7.12 Ratings00 Ratings
    Artificial intelligence6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Integration8.72 Ratings00 Ratings
    Security
    Comparison of Security features of Oracle WebCenter Content and RWS Tridion Sites
    Feature
    Oracle WebCenter Content
    -
    Ratings
    RWS Tridion Sites
    9.0
    9 Ratings
    9% above category average
    Role-based user permissions00 Ratings9.09 Ratings
    Platform & Infrastructure
    Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Oracle WebCenter Content and RWS Tridion Sites
    Feature
    Oracle WebCenter Content
    -
    Ratings
    RWS Tridion Sites
    9.1
    8 Ratings
    15% above category average
    API00 Ratings8.36 Ratings
    Internationalization / multi-language00 Ratings10.07 Ratings
    Web Content Creation
    Comparison of Web Content Creation features of Oracle WebCenter Content and RWS Tridion Sites
    Feature
    Oracle WebCenter Content
    -
    Ratings
    RWS Tridion Sites
    8.5
    8 Ratings
    8% above category average
    WYSIWYG editor00 Ratings8.08 Ratings
    Code quality / cleanliness00 Ratings8.07 Ratings
    Admin section00 Ratings9.08 Ratings
    Page templates00 Ratings9.08 Ratings
    Library of website themes00 Ratings8.24 Ratings
    Mobile optimization / responsive design00 Ratings9.07 Ratings
    Publishing workflow00 Ratings9.08 Ratings
    Form generator00 Ratings8.33 Ratings
    Web Content Management
    Comparison of Web Content Management features of Oracle WebCenter Content and RWS Tridion Sites
    Feature
    Oracle WebCenter Content
    -
    Ratings
    RWS Tridion Sites
    7.6
    8 Ratings
    1% above category average
    Content taxonomy00 Ratings9.07 Ratings
    SEO support00 Ratings9.06 Ratings
    Bulk management00 Ratings9.08 Ratings
    Availability / breadth of extensions00 Ratings8.35 Ratings
    Community / comment management00 Ratings3.03 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Oracle WebCenter ContentRWS Tridion Sites
    Small Businesses
    Egnyte
    Score9.3 out of 10
    Umbraco CMS
    Score7 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Epicor ECM
    Score7.7 out of 10
    Square Online
    Score7.7 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Dashpivot - By Sitemate
    Score10 out of 10
    Storyblok
    Score9.9 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Oracle WebCenter ContentRWS Tridion Sites
    Likelihood to Recommend
    7.2
    (6 ratings)
    9.9
    (22 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    7.9
    (2 ratings)
    6.3
    (15 ratings)
    Usability
    6.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.5
    (2 ratings)
    Support Rating
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Oracle WebCenter ContentRWS Tridion Sites
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Oracle
    WebCenter Content is suitable for payables invoice processing for companies with a huge volume of paper invoices. 80% of data entry effort can be reduced. For small companies with less volume, WebCenter may not make sense. WebCenter is not perfect. It has some issues. We raised enhancement requests with Oracle, hopefully, Oracle will resolve them soon.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    RWS Group
    Love the product and I really like how we use it for public sites. The only negative aspect is that it is just hard to find Tridion devs that understand the tool, grasp .net, react, and understand the blueprint, etc.
    Read full review
    Pros
    Oracle
    • It provided one single repository with a URL link to access each AP invoice.
    • It gives a life cycle to each invoice where a business user can perform some additional indexing as per their needs.
    • It also provides a reporting feature and a front-end for users to view invoices with ease and very helpful for auditing purpose.
    • It uses the BPEL engine to customize the life cycle and also it can automate the auto entry of supplier invoices in your EBS system.
    • Reduce a lot of manual efforts, manual errors and workforce.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    RWS Group
    • Makes it easy to spin up a new site quickly
    • Allows for numerous users to work on the same site without conflicting with each other's changes
    • Allows you to unpublish changes or revert to old versions if you make a mistake
    • Allows you to time publishing actions (for example, you can set it to happen overnight)
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Oracle
    • Some functionality you would expect to be built-in (such as reporting for compliance) is not and requires other Oracle products to be integrated.
    • Separating an invoice with multiple lines for different departments is not an easy task.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    RWS Group
    • Tridion is complicated in enough ways that it makes it difficult to train new users. Therefore, we have to limit the number of people with access to the system since we have not yet implemented Workflow.
    • When something goes wrong (items fail to publish, or there is unexpected behavior with components), there is little explanation provided that would point us in the right direction to troubleshoot. As a result, content Authors and Editors have to frequently ask for IT assistance.
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Oracle
    The challenges with converting to a completely new system create quite a barrier to switching to anything else. If we find another system that offers guaranteed improvements to the user interface -- as well as as a more coherent set of options for data interchanges with current and future enterprise data sources -- we would be more interested in swithing to that new product. Of course, the expense in purchasing competitor system, along with the costs of migrating all current content, along with retooling all existing workflows in place, would be carefully weighed against the benefits incurred from a switch-over.
    Read full review
    RWS Group
    I am giving this a semi-high rating because we have already got Tridion up and running and we are still in the process of moving the sites over to Tridion. It is unlikely we will be moving things to a new CMS AGAIN in the near future as the cost to get Tridion was high.
    Read full review
    Usability
    Oracle
    It meets all required functionality requirements -- but handles none of them in an exceptional manner
    Read full review
    RWS Group
    The editor user interface is very user friendly and in-site editing makes simple updates fast and easy. The extensibility of Tridion is a big plus and the ability to add our own options into the default Tridion interface helps us integrate with external systems. Finally, the user permissions and security system helps us deploy it within our large organization.
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Oracle
    I can't really provide an answer for this question because I think the basic premise is flawed. Which system an organization selects is based (or should be based) on their unique business and organizational requirements, not the features of the system. We do not recommend a particular solution to a client based on subjective preference for one system over another but rather for its appropriateness to achieve a particular goal or collection of goals.
    Read full review
    RWS Group
    It is a nuclear missile compared to the other handguns and knives on the market today. But it also requires nuclear technicians and expertise that a handgun doesn't require. Do you need to decimate your competition and you have the investment capabilities necessary to put a nuclear missile into the sky? Then definitely do it. Especially if you need a very good multi-lingual blueprint provider like Tridion.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Oracle
    • We were looking for a scalable solution for invoice processing needs. WebCenter did fit the bill. It reduced manual data entry effort by 80%.
    • WebCenter saved our storage costs. We do not need to store the physical paper copies anymore in our expensive offices.
    • WebCenter increased the employee engagement and reduced monotonous data entry work. Employees now have time to spend on value-added work rather than data entry.
    • Auditors were happy with the tool, as they can retrieve any document with the click of a button as opposed to search and find a physical document.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    RWS Group
    • SDL is a very complex system. Creating custom components by external vendors turned out to be expensive.
    • The learning curve is very slow, so training takes a lot of time and cost.
    • The revamped corporate site looks clean, modern, and is mobile-friendly.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots