Periscope Source vs. Zip Intake-to-Procure

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Periscope Source
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
Periscope Source (formerly BidSync) is a suite of e-procurement software now owned and supported by Periscope Holdings in Austin, Texas since the December 2014 acquisition.
$59
per month
Zip Intake-to-Procure
Score 7.8 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
Zip provides a place for employees to initiate a purchase or vendor request. Each request is routed for approval across procurement, finance, IT, data security, legal, and other teams, and Zip integrates into ERP and P2P solutions to create a PR or draft PO. The vendor states Zip works with Canva, Checkr, Hopin, Zapier, CM Group, and other companies both public and private.N/A
Pricing
Periscope SourceZip Intake-to-Procure
Editions & Modules
State
$59.00
per month
Regional
$69.00
per month
National
$119.00
per month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Periscope SourceZip Intake-to-Procure
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Periscope SourceZip Intake-to-Procure
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Best Alternatives
Periscope SourceZip Intake-to-Procure
Small Businesses
MIP Fund Accounting
MIP Fund Accounting
Score 8.7 out of 10
MIP Fund Accounting
MIP Fund Accounting
Score 8.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Esker
Esker
Score 8.9 out of 10
Esker
Esker
Score 8.9 out of 10
Enterprises
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
Score 8.1 out of 10
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
Score 8.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Periscope SourceZip Intake-to-Procure
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(1 ratings)
7.6
(22 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Periscope SourceZip Intake-to-Procure
Likelihood to Recommend
Periscope Holdings
Well suited for tracking partner success and other commercial roles but can seem overwhelming for those who are new to it. Specific scenarios are the ability to be able to pull relevant data into charts and graphs that can be made into actionable tasks for commercial teams to pursue. It is less appropriate for non-tech associates due to its data analysis ways.
Read full review
Zip
Zip can be used for routing all vendor-level approvals for new vendors and all renewals across our organization. It can also be helpful for managing all purchases from existing vendors. For non-spend related approvals, it’s not as well suited. Zip was definitely designed for procurement workflows. They also have a vendor management portal that links up directly to something like NetSuite for management and visibility.
Read full review
Pros
Periscope Holdings
  • KPI Tracking
  • False positive display
  • Graphs and charts related to dashboards
Read full review
Zip
  • No coding - Ability for the administrator to make changes without development resources helps us be agile as a procurement org.
  • Visibility to the user in a great user interface
  • Accountability (helps us track SLAs on response time), Audit trails keeping track of everything
  • The implementation team was incredible, as is ongoing support. They want you to succeed in your goals vs. just implement their tool
Read full review
Cons
Periscope Holdings
  • More functionality
  • More decision-based
  • Clearer graphs
Read full review
Zip
  • There are some duplicated fields such as anticipated total spend vs. price line item breakdown that asks for the same thing. This is a little bit tedious
  • Does not show which invoices got processed and applied to open POs
  • Does not integrate / migrate special custom fields within Zip Intake-to-Procure into other tech stacks (NetSuite)
Read full review
Support Rating
Periscope Holdings
No answers on this topic
Zip
Incredibly responsive and helpful.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Periscope Holdings
I don’t have experience with similar products.
Read full review
Zip
I prefer Zip for its for its user-friendly interface and ease of adoption, especially if the organization values a simpler and more intuitive system for users across various departments. Comparatively, Zip is a more budget-friendly solution compared to some enterprise-level systems like SAP ARIBA or Oracle PeopleSoft, especially for smaller or mid-sized organizations with specific procurement needs.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Periscope Holdings
  • Positive impact on partner success
  • Positive impact on revenue due to increased revenue
  • Negative impact on sales and budget
Read full review
Zip
  • Visibility for all necessary approvers and reviewers of the process.
  • Lack of open API to other systems (i.e Mondays, Smartsheet) is causing concerns for team that might want to move away from current tool.
  • No 3rd party implementation required is huge cost / time savings.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Zip Intake-to-Procure Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Zip supports ultra-configurable, parallel workflows with our no-code configuration.Screenshot of Zip also integrates with all major ticketing, CLM, GRC, and ERP/P2P solutions. Here's an example integration card for JIRA.Screenshot of Zip has an optional vendor-facing portal for the vendor to provide diligence materials, including documents, surveys, and even bank settlement information.Screenshot of Zip's vendor-facing portal includes an optional bank settlement form with an attestation.