ProcessMaker

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
ProcessMaker
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
ProcessMaker is a business process management and workflow automation platform. It uses a drag-and-drop interface to build workflows to drive automation.N/A
Pricing
ProcessMaker
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ProcessMaker
Free Trial
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup fee
Additional Details—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
ProcessMaker
Considered Both Products
ProcessMaker
Chose ProcessMaker
In the short run, ProcessMaker blows KiSSFLOW away. It is easy to understand and use. But in the long run, once you get into more complicated actions, they equal out. The price was right, and while we eventually went for another option, ProcessMaker would have been the next …
Chose ProcessMaker
Before making the decision to get ProcessMaker, we assessed different and best options in the market, which are also quite competitive. KiSSFLOW, Blueworks Live, and Bizagi, being the most relevant and ADONIS, to mention the ones we consider the most relevant and capable of …
Chose ProcessMaker
It is far cheaper than JIRA. I have used JIRA , the UI is good as compared to processmaker. But compared to workflow designing and management, I found processmaker far easier. And yes ProcessMaker requires less resources to run on.
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
ProcessMaker
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
ProcessMaker
9.3
6 Ratings
13% above category average
Dashboards10.06 Ratings
Standard reports9.06 Ratings
Custom reports9.06 Ratings
Process Engine
Comparison of Process Engine features of Product A and Product B
ProcessMaker
9.2
6 Ratings
9% above category average
Process designer10.06 Ratings
Process simulation10.05 Ratings
Business rules engine8.06 Ratings
SOA support9.06 Ratings
Process player9.05 Ratings
Support for modeling languages9.04 Ratings
Form builder9.75 Ratings
Model execution9.05 Ratings
Collaboration
Comparison of Collaboration features of Product A and Product B
ProcessMaker
7.5
4 Ratings
9% below category average
Social collaboration tools7.54 Ratings
Content Management Capabilties
Comparison of Content Management Capabilties features of Product A and Product B
ProcessMaker
9.0
6 Ratings
10% above category average
Content management9.06 Ratings
Best Alternatives
ProcessMaker
Small Businesses
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.7 out of 10
Enterprises
IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation
IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
ProcessMaker
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(6 ratings)
User Testimonials
ProcessMaker
Likelihood to Recommend
ProcessMaker Inc.
I loved it. You will not get an easier interface. You can develop workflow processes in a simple way, one which allows anyone to understand what you are trying to accomplish; however, you will get into some issues if your employees are scared of coding (when you get to the advanced features). For some, this will never be an issue as the knowledge you need is very basic. But for the school I was working with, it would have stopped them cold
Read full review
Pros
ProcessMaker Inc.
  • We can write PHP and Javascript code to handle the way the ProcessMaker does. It makes the ProcessMaker more flexible to meet our requests on our workflow.
  • The Processmaker provides a What-You-See-Is-What-You-Get flowchart design tool, we can draw our process very easy like Visio. And, We can use the flowchart to implement our workflow.
  • Also, the Dynaform, the electronic form function of Processmaker, is WYSIWYG form design tool, help us design forms participated in the process.
Read full review
Cons
ProcessMaker Inc.
  • I am still not able to achieve complicated workflows. May be a developer to create a plugin is required.
  • The UI can be more attractive and colourful.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
ProcessMaker Inc.
Before making the decision to get ProcessMaker, we assessed different and best options in the market, which are also quite competitive. KiSSFLOW, Blueworks Live, and Bizagi, being the most relevant and ADONIS, to mention the ones we consider the most relevant and capable of meeting our needs. In the end, we went for ProcessMaker because of mainly three things as described before: 1. Real-time process status tracking. 2. Metrics and dashboards. 3. Ease of use for constructing diagrams.
Read full review
Return on Investment
ProcessMaker Inc.
  • This would have been the easiest program to implement. It would have been the quickest, and the one that most of the employees would have been able to master. That alone would have saved countless dollars in time investment.
  • Unfortunately, the environment doesn't support knowledge of coding. So, they would never be able to advance further than a certain degree before having to bring someone else in again. It would have saved money at first, but then would have ended up costing in the long run.
Read full review
ScreenShots