Salesforce Field Service vs. SAP Access Control

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Salesforce Field Service
Score 7.6 out of 10
N/A
Field Service (formerly known as Field Service Lightning) is a customizable, mobile-friendly field service hub in Salesforce. It provides tools to manage work orders, scheduling, and a mobile workforce.
$50
per month per user
SAP Access Control
Score 7.8 out of 10
N/A
SAP Access control streamlines the process of managing and validating user access to applications and data with minimal support from IT, with the goal of giving employees the applications and services they need without exposing data and processes to unauthorized use.N/A
Pricing
Salesforce Field ServiceSAP Access Control
Editions & Modules
Contractor
$50
per month per user
Contractor Plus
$75
per month per user
Dispatcher
$165
per month per user
Technician
$165
per month per user
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Salesforce Field ServiceSAP Access Control
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Salesforce Field ServiceSAP Access Control
Top Pros
Top Cons
Best Alternatives
Salesforce Field ServiceSAP Access Control
Small Businesses
Kickserv
Kickserv
Score 9.3 out of 10
Teams Manager for Microsoft Teams
Teams Manager for Microsoft Teams
Score 7.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Jotform
Jotform
Score 8.7 out of 10
The Okta Identity Cloud
The Okta Identity Cloud
Score 8.9 out of 10
Enterprises
ServiceNow Customer Service Management
ServiceNow Customer Service Management
Score 7.9 out of 10
Imprivata OneSign
Imprivata OneSign
Score 9.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Salesforce Field ServiceSAP Access Control
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(5 ratings)
7.9
(16 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.5
(2 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
6.0
(2 ratings)
Support Rating
6.0
(1 ratings)
7.0
(3 ratings)
Online Training
7.3
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Salesforce Field ServiceSAP Access Control
Likelihood to Recommend
Salesforce
ClickMobile can be implemented in virtually any organization that has a need for a Mobile Workforce Management system. The only real limitations or concerns will be with the backend hardware architecture. Sectors that have really seen the best utilization of the software are ones that have a dynamic service schedule and need to be extremely flexible with their customers service needs. In a day where customer service is so important to an organizations ability to remain the market leader it is extremely important for an organization to consider implementing a mobile solution. For organizations that already have a mobile management solution in place it is critical that they continuously reevaluate the system in order to remain competitive in their market and drive down operational costs. Change can be difficult for many organizations and the buy-in from the Field resources, who will ultimately be utilizing the mobile solution on a daily basis, will be critical when implementing something like ClickMobile. If the field resources are not able to accept a change to process then Change Management needs to take place during the implementation. It is generally a good rule to begin Change Management at the beginning of any large project, such as one where a mobile solution is being introduced.
Read full review
SAP
Appropriate for SAP hrs hierarchy integration and can have multiple hierarchies of org structures adopted as alternative workflow support. Cons of access control are the logs of firefighter usage are still limited in depth and does not evolve to adop more cloud products which are coming at a plaster pace than the ac product as such.
Read full review
Pros
Salesforce
  • Great dispatcher service which helps the Field Service managers
  • Great view of the availability of the technicians
  • Ability to track real time any updates about the service appointment
Read full review
SAP
  • SAP Access Control ensures that our services are accessed by the right users since it send me alerts when an employee tries to access any application. That way, I am able to either authorize or cancel the request to safeguard of company data.
  • With SAP Access Control, it is easy to automate and monitor how our team access services and applications. SAP Access Control has an automatic feature that notifies me when employees access applications and services and the issues they are encountering.
  • In addition, SAP Access Control add security on employees login to ensure that their data on the applications are encrypted to never leak to cyber attackers.
Read full review
Cons
Salesforce
  • Click has a long way to go to improve functionality of its current features. It is buggy and slow, and does not sync correctly with scheduling.
  • Mobile users can only see one day at a time, making point-of-care scheduling cumbersome.
  • Tech support is only provided to end users by email.
Read full review
SAP
  • It still uses the webdynpro for the front end. All webdynpro applications should be migrated to Fiori for a better user experience.
  • Some functionalities can't manage in mass way. I.E. building derive roles/multiple single roles,
  • Interface with LDAP is not efficient.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Salesforce
ClickSoftware is still being used. As far as I can tell it will be used tomorrow as well. Once you make the commitment to run with that as your scheduling engine, it would take a lot of effort to evaluate and implement another companies' solution without significant disruption to your service organization.
Read full review
SAP
We are very happy with it.
Read full review
Usability
Salesforce
No answers on this topic
SAP
This is a great tool for a medium to large sized company. SAP Access Control requires a great deal of SAP knowledge to use, but it is certainly information that can be learned. Their customer support is wonderful and easy to work with. The overall usability is great. I greatly recommend this software.
Read full review
Support Rating
Salesforce
We had to contact support a number of times related to bugs that our admin/dev teams were not able to troubleshoot. Unfortunately the Salesforce support was not super helpful, asking us to perform steps that we already completed and included in the original support ticket. Then the problems couldn't be reproduced so ultimately the tickets got closed without resolution. LWC support in the mobile app is severely lacking.
Read full review
SAP
This product fulfills all our requirements. We can use this for user management, role management, risk analysis, business role management, workflow management. Initial configuration takes a lot of effort. Otherwise it's a great product for the end user. SAP Access Control tool performance needs improvement, sometimes it slows down the processing time for requests.
Read full review
Online Training
Salesforce
Overall the training was quite informative but did lack detail in some areas. It had all of the necessary content for an experience product user but didn't offer enough information for a new user to complete the training and then feel comfortable in real-world situations running or managing the software. I would recommend this course for anyone with at least 1 year of full-time exposure to the ClickSchedule product.
Read full review
SAP
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Salesforce
I know of IFS but I do not think it is a worthy or close competitor to Salesforce Field Service lightning as its not that user friendly yet with a complicated interface. Also it does not have the name and respect and brand value that Salesforce commands in the market thereby making it easier for Business to approve.
Read full review
SAP
Pricing was higher for the cloud version of the BTP service - IAG. SAP Access Control pretty much facilitates everything we are looking for as an enterprise with an efficient dollar cost ROI for the services we are looking for. Also, there were many features on the cloud version which came bundled with the license and we had to pay for them even though we did not actually use these products.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Salesforce
  • Field nurses are spending 4-5 (paid) hours a week trying to troubleshoot this software.
Read full review
SAP
  • Reducing risk of fraud. Implementing SAP Access Control allows analysis of every role assigned to a job on the organization. Through this analysis, weakness on roles are detected, corrected and monitored. As the users feel the change, they also feel that they are being monitored, preventing any intent to use his position and privileges to take personal advantage. So a major impact to organizations is to reduce the financial lost due to frauds.
  • Reducing cost for monitoring. Another positive impact is lowering the cost of monitoring. This is twofold: First, a rather small team can manage access management. Second, through the use of SAP Access Control the complete universe of roles and users can be monitored without increasing the cost for the continuous monitoring.
  • During transactions. The use of SAP Access Controls allows detection of transactions that, from an information security point of view, require some redesign. When SAP GCR is implemented, you make some discoveries such as: obsolete transactions, transactions with no authorization objects and the like. The transactions with these problems can be left out of the active roles, waiting for remediation of the issues found.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Salesforce Field Service Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of