Overall Satisfaction with Salesforce Field Service
We have implemented solutions for our business through Salesforce Field Service solving real life problems like Defect liability period (DLP) for Real estate domain. Previously as well, Salesforce FSL had been used as the tool to improve on the existing legacy system to dispatch technicians from Business side when they faced complaints/issues which the Business is liable for.
- Great dispatcher service which helps the Field Service managers
- Great view of the availability of the technicians
- Ability to track real time any updates about the service appointment
- License could be less pricier esp. the dispatcher license
- Restricted workflows and data visibility, along with slow performance can complicate the experience for the technician
- Since we use devices primarily for this like Ipad and Android devices, the mobile app needs to be improved which crashes often
- Positive Impact being customer satisfaction
- Positive being able to manage technicians better
- Positive being tracking of the service requests
I know of IFS but I do not think it is a worthy or close competitor to Salesforce Field Service lightning as its not that user friendly yet with a complicated interface. Also it does not have the name and respect and brand value that Salesforce commands in the market thereby making it easier for Business to approve.
Do you think Salesforce Field Service delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Salesforce Field Service's feature set?
Yes
Did Salesforce Field Service live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Salesforce Field Service go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Salesforce Field Service again?
Yes