SAP ERP vs ONESOURCE

• Integration of functions within the organization (example: warehouse releasing and inventory management with finance costing and logistics)
• Security features are on point. Clear segregation of duties can be achieved by assigning access rights based on least privilege principle
• Can be easily learned.
• Roles assigned to users can be customized.

Read full review

• ONESOURCE allows for easy implementation. We were able to implement the product in a few weeks.
• ONESOURCE provides detailed records that provide support for the groupings on the tax return. This will assist in providing documentation to auditors in a timely fashion.

Read full review

• High cost of licensing, implementation & maintenance.
• It gets complex when companies try to implement their existing business processes to Standard SAP provided business processes if it differs.
• It is not for small/medium size businesses
• The complete implementation process may take several years. Usually, companies take core modules of SAP ERP & implement those first.

Read full review

• ONESOURCE absolutely needs to restore their TIN Matching feature. Not having a TIN Matching feature is huge and needs to be addressed immediately.
• The software interface itself is outdated and clunky. It is way behind in terms of user-friendliness and convenience. Additionally, it is only compatible with Internet Explorer. ONESOURCE is literally the only reason I would ever access Internet Explorer which is notably slower and more prone to freezing than Google Chrome or Safari. A good portion of our business uses Macs which means they are SOL on accessing ONESOURCE.
• The ability to look at multiple tax years for a single recipient would be huge. Currently, if a recipient asks us to pull three years of data, this means three different searches within each year's ONESOURCE instance. It's tedious and could be improved.

Read full review

• The Coca-Cola bottlers use a multi-tenant environment, and that helps their bottom line as they share a single instance.
• Integration back to sales enables the Bottles to be more efficient and saves costs that relate to integration to 3rd party sales applications.
• Reduces the number of 3rd party applications, which saves on operating costs.

Read full review

• Without the use of ONESOURCE Transfer Pricing, we wouldn't be able to turn out transfer pricing documentation on our own. We have approximately 125 transfer pricing reports a year that require preparation, and outsourcing those at $15-25,000 a piece isn't feasible. We pay less than $50,000 annually for ONESOURCE Transfer Pricing and can now turn out as many reports as we need for a flat fee.
• ONESOURCE BEPS Action Manager ("BAM") allows us to prepare both our Country by Country Report and our Master File in house. We had received quotes from accounting firms in the range of $100-200,000 annually for a Country by Country Report and $50,000 for a Master File annually. For a $20,000 investment annually in BAM, we can complete both in house.

Read full review