Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring vs. VMware Aria Operations for Applications

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
SignalFX is Real-Time Cloud Monitoring and Observability for Infrastructure, Microservices and Applications. SignalFX was acquired by Splunk in August 2019. SignalFX Infrastructure Monitoring provides real-time cloud monitoring and observability platform for infrastructure, microservices and DevOps. A new SignalFX product, SignalFx Microservices APM, was released March 2020 to detect issues, provide real-time app troubleshooting, and future-proof expectations.
$15
per month
VMware Aria Operations for Applications
Score 6.8 out of 10
N/A
VMware Aria Operations for Applications, formerly VMware Tanzu Observability or Wavefront, is a metrics monitoring service for cloud and application environments with observability and analytics tools designed to enable DevOps functions at SaaS companies where scale, performance, and reliability are essential to their business. The original technology was developed by Wavefront, which was acquired by VMware in 2017.
$1.50
per data point/second monthly
Pricing
Splunk Infrastructure MonitoringVMware Aria Operations for Applications
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Tanzu Observability
$1.50
per data point/second monthly
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Splunk Infrastructure MonitoringVMware Aria Operations for Applications
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Splunk Infrastructure MonitoringVMware Aria Operations for Applications
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Best Alternatives
Splunk Infrastructure MonitoringVMware Aria Operations for Applications
Small Businesses
Veeam ONE
Veeam ONE
Score 8.5 out of 10
InfluxDB
InfluxDB
Score 8.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
IBM Instana
IBM Instana
Score 8.9 out of 10
IBM Instana
IBM Instana
Score 8.9 out of 10
Enterprises
IBM Instana
IBM Instana
Score 8.9 out of 10
IBM Instana
IBM Instana
Score 8.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Splunk Infrastructure MonitoringVMware Aria Operations for Applications
Likelihood to Recommend
8.3
(24 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
6.4
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
7.3
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Splunk Infrastructure MonitoringVMware Aria Operations for Applications
Likelihood to Recommend
Splunk
Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring is well suited for any complicated environment where you have apps and servers across multiple clouds and platforms and products. If you have a data centre where all your apps and servers are in one single network, you could probably get away with older solutions. But for any modern, complex, hybrid-cloud microservices environment, Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring is a must-have.
Read full review
VMware by Broadcom
No answers on this topic
Pros
Splunk
  • SignalFX handles historical metric aggregation exceptionally well, providing a multifaceted approach to event detection based on anomalies.
  • SignalFX's cost is incredibly flexible with their pricing model of DPM (data-point per minute) vs the traditional "per host" model that most monitoring SaaS use.
  • SignalFX support is responsive and knowledgeable, very eager to help solve your immediate problems.
  • SignalFX integrations is vast and constantly growing, making adoption easy even when multiple different open-source technologies are used in your stack.
Read full review
VMware by Broadcom
No answers on this topic
Cons
Splunk
  • Better integration with our clients (native mobile clients SDKs will be great).
  • A way to easily tag filters and move them across metrics/formula.
  • Alert system to easy false [alarm] and hard to configure.
  • Be able to have group more dimensions (and have more values on each).
Read full review
VMware by Broadcom
No answers on this topic
Likelihood to Renew
Splunk
Good: Stable system with low error rate Easy to use for simple use cases Bad: UI is not very clear for complex usage Mobile view (when logged in from phone) is bad No library for .net
Read full review
VMware by Broadcom
No answers on this topic
Usability
Splunk
I find that learning the interface can take some time. We need a better show-and-tell on how the Teams pages, Dashboard Groups, Dashboards and charts delay. Advance SignalFlow is sometimes hard to build. Some better samples of advanced SignalFlow would be helpful. For example, Splunk SPL has a vast resource of examples.
Read full review
VMware by Broadcom
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Splunk
They’re not for the same purpose but we’re using NewRelic and Honeycomb for monitoring purposes. NewRelic is used for HTTP client monitoring for system related throughput, error, database and external client monitoring. Honeycomb is used to monitor actual HTTP request/response values. Splunk [Infrastructure Monitoring] is used for real-time application related throughout and error monitoring.
Read full review
VMware by Broadcom
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Splunk
  • Reduced downtime.
  • Caused us to get a lot of spam when we redeployed apps and old instances stopped sending metrics. Muting alerts solves this, but people often forget to do it or do it incorrectly.
  • Helped us find historical info about instances/apps.
Read full review
VMware by Broadcom
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots

Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring Screenshots

Screenshot of Real-time monitoring for public, private and hybrid cloud