We're sorry, but no detailed pricing edition information is available.
Other pricing plans from leading alternatives in this category.
The installation process had bugs. The pricing structure was confusing. The diagnostic tools could have a better UX. … It has reduced our cost a bit in terms of head count The sc…
time. It was inexpensive compared to more bulky solutions saving upfront cost. It’s easy to install and enable allowing more developer savings.
Microsoft IIS is well suited if you already have the expensive Windows Server infrastructure--it will already be on there, most likely
Enterprise, etc), because then it will be more affordable to implement for smaller-sized projects where the cost of management and recurrent costs of subscription … Tracking down the root cause of a problem takes a long time, which increases the cost and is a very tedious process. Apache … The Apache server is more recommended for smaller sized project…
Microsoft IIS has allowed us to quickly and cheaply spin up thousands of sites when needed Microsoft IIS is a great as it is
components, open source solutions like Apache or Nginx could be better and cheaper (based on Linux).
offered on any version of Windows, IIS is a great, relatively free (with the cost of Windows) option to host web applications without needing extensive effort
Low cost of installation, as it is already included with Microsoft Server Ease of
option for learning web programming after college. Netscape Enterprise was cost prohibitive for a newly graduated student. HTTPD was difficult to "throw
a website, there are other solutions to do this that are simpler and more cost effective. If you are using some vendor's application and needing to push … security, then there are other solutions to do this that are simpler and more cost effective. If more granular and complex…
