Overall Satisfaction with Cisco Jabber
We use Cisco Jabber as a substitute for physical desk phones at the office. We used to use Cisco IP Phone's (the classic 7942 if my memory serves me right), but they were limiting the user mobility. For example, the users could not answer their phone if they were not present at their desk, or in the office. Therefore we switched to a more mobile solution such as Jabber on a global scale.
- Provides user mobility to work from anywhere
- Seamless integration with other Cisco products, such as Finesse
- Easy to configure from a user-admin perspective
- Stability depends on internet connection more than it needs to
- Using different tools for almost the same purpose(collaboration) is not user-friendly. Maybe a super product combining WebEx and Jabber features could be an option.
- Expensive pricing and pricing model for big organizations (per license)
- Cisco Jabber helped us develop a Business Continuity Plan in case of emergencies.
- It allowed our employees to answer their office-phones remotely.
- It saved us a 10.000$ investment every 4 years on the desk phones for only the Turkey office, possibly much higher figures on the global scale of Hilti.
Cisco Jabber by itself lacks the features other collaboration tools have. The main functions of the application such as calling/answering calls, chatting, work great. However, it does not really allow for working collaboratively compared to applications such as Microsoft Teams. My honest suggestion is to build Jabber and Webex features in one application since both applications serve the same purpose, working with other colleagues.
Do you think Cisco Jabber delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Cisco Jabber's feature set?
No
Did Cisco Jabber live up to sales and marketing promises?
I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process
Did implementation of Cisco Jabber go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Cisco Jabber again?
Yes