ER/Studio has been my tool of choice for the last 15 years
June 21, 2017

ER/Studio has been my tool of choice for the last 15 years

Michael Romm | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User

Overall Satisfaction with ER/Studio

ER/Studio is used by my team and possibly by some other teams. I use it for logical and physical modeling of databases, both OLTP and data warehouses, as well as for applying incremental changes to the databases (deployments). I also use it to maintain consistent naming standards.
  • ER/Studio is great for dividing logical and physical design. A logical model can be used with different physical platforms.
  • Studio can a useful macro capability that allows me to apply the naming standards across the model with ease and consistency.
  • ER/Studio does a very good job at comparing the model with the actual database and generating DDL scripts for production deployments.
  • ER/Studio has an excellent reporting and model publishing capabilities allowing me to produce models in the HTML format and publish them for the team as needed.
  • We recently moved to using AWS Redshift as our data warehousing platform. ER/Studio does not support Redshift.
  • ER/Studio does not support conceptual data modeling.
  • Increased quality of the data models.
  • Increased productivity in data modeling and database development.
  • Ability to share the models with the team.
  • aqua, Toad Data Modeler and Visio
ER/Studio is the most mature, reach in features and quality and therefore useful. Unfortunately, it lacks compatibility with AWS Redshift.
ER/Studio is great for both logical and physical layers of database modeling. It does not support conceptual data modeling though. It should be used in both transactional and warehouse modeling. It is useful for enforcing database naming conventions, good design practices and comprehensive reporting on database models, including publishing the models for the wider team.

ER/Studio Data Architect Feature Ratings