Overall Satisfaction with Google Search Console
I mostly use it for my clients' SEO needs. There usually is not marketing or other relevant department, so I am responsible. Business problems it addresses are data/website monitoring.
- The "new" SC's Overview is great for sharing with clients as it's a simplified presentation of different data with graphs.
- Performance is my turf. It is designed for me at a glance to recognize the peaks and valleys of traffic. Clicks v. Impressions remains something central to SEO and other marketing efforts.
- This is surely subjective, but as long as I could, I used the old SC but now that I am forced to just use the new, there still is a bit of a learning curve. Again, this is not a fair complaint as in time all will be forgotten, but I really do miss the old version.
- One thing I do not like is the loss of the Manual URL Submission. I understand why it's been removed, but sometimes I am doing refreshes of pages and want that new version visited and reindexed ASAP rather than have to wait for Google to revisit.
- ROI for me always boils down to time taken for any given task. SC allows me to quickly get the data I need to share, or at least glance at.
Although StatCounter is more like Google Analytics than Search Console, it still has a lot of overlap. StatCounter is relatively small, so it does not provide anywhere near the functions of SC. But, it's good to have a secondary source of traffic and other related data, one other than what Google is informing.
Do you think Google Search Console delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Google Search Console's feature set?
Yes
Did Google Search Console live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Google Search Console go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Google Search Console again?
Yes