TrustRadius
IBM Bare Metal Servers work, but they make you work too... but that is just the way it is.
https://www.trustradius.com/infrastructure-as-a-service-iaasIBM Cloud Bare Metal ServersUnspecified8.147101
jonathan gough profile photo
July 02, 2019

IBM Bare Metal Servers work, but they make you work too... but that is just the way it is.

Score 7 out of 101
Vetted Review
Reseller
Review Source

Overall Satisfaction with IBM Cloud Bare Metal Servers

We use this as a compute server and a build server for deployments and dev work. It is being used by several different groups at a single client for a lot of backend management and monthly/quarterly intensive compute jobs. It addresses the business issue that Cloud Foundry or virtual boxes do not have enough CPU power as well as a dedicated place for specific tasks.
  • Very good for compute
  • Reliable because it is always up and not shared
  • Easy to set up and get running
  • Very slow to provision
  • Understanding billing is tough and takes a month to really see what your usage is
  • Limited compute options.
  • Good ROI for compute intensive Batch jobs
  • Reliable for intensive build jobs
  • Slow to provision. If you need it you have to wait.
We primarily use these for high intensity compute jobs. We have optimized our workloads to run in parallel on bare metal servers in IBM Cloud. We got roughly a 80% speed increase when using bare metal in comparison to using shared services. Our jobs use all cores at roughly 100% for 8-20 hours at a time. We saw and had to deal with a lot of failures when dealing with shared resources.
It is relatively slow, but it works. We have seen faster start times in other cloud providers. Admittedly, we have seen longer start-up times than 4 hours when using IBM cloud bare metal servers. other services like AWS or GCP have more reliable startup times that what we have experienced with IBM
  • Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2)
In general we have found that the provisioning and permissions and switching between instances of bare metal and virtual machines were easier in AWS than in IBM. Also the billing in AWS has much greater transparency. The UI interface is also easier to navigate and understand. we also found that our users liked them better.
  • Very good for batch processing.
  • Very good for CPU intensive jobs.
  • Good for reliable always up and not having to share resources.
  • On the down side, it is less appropriate for scenarios where you need on demand compute.
  • If budget is an issue, it is quite expensive.
  • Not great if you need resources quickly.

IBM Cloud Bare Metal Servers Feature Ratings

Service-level Agreement (SLA) uptime
7
Dynamic scaling
5
Elastic load balancing
5
Pre-configured templates
6
Monitoring tools
9
Pre-defined machine images
9
Operating system support
9
Security controls
7