Overall Satisfaction with Mimecast Advanced Email Security
We used Mimecast for all of our incoming and outgoing email filtering. Mimecast helped deal with a lot of spam. It also handled our outgoing email encryption. It also helped with VIP impersonation protection. We were customers for a little over five years. We out-grew the platform as our security needs increased.
- Spam Filtering.
- Impersonation Protection.
- On-hold Queue.
- Outbound Encryption.
- Granular Email Views.
- BEC Detection.
- Slow, messy UI.
- Process for trusting emails is confusing.
- Creating blocklists is all or nothing.
- Gave us substantially more protection than we did without.
- Gave users the flexibility to manage their own block lists, allowing our help desk staff to focus on other tasks.
- Increased ease with visibility into emails that have hit inboxes.
- Ability to block emails and domains fairly easily, saving time.
n/a
Mimecast gave us what we didn't really have before. Advanced protection. We were using an on-prem Barracuda spam filter. This was light years ahead of that.
Mimecast offers a lot more features than the old Barracuda gateway. It is all cloud-based as well. Being able to access it from anywhere is a plus right out of the gate. The Barracuda basically just did spam filtering. There was nothing in terms of archiving, list management, etc. VIP and impersonation protection was very good.
Do you think Mimecast Advanced Email Security delivers good value for the price?
Not sure
Are you happy with Mimecast Advanced Email Security's feature set?
No
Did Mimecast Advanced Email Security live up to sales and marketing promises?
I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process
Did implementation of Mimecast Advanced Email Security go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Mimecast Advanced Email Security again?
No