Tracealyzer use for an average user
February 10, 2023
Tracealyzer use for an average user
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Overall Satisfaction with Percepio Tracealyzer
Tracealyzer allowed me to quickly identify embedded OS and code use issues using standard interfaces and hardware tools that far surpass writing custom debug routines, parsers, corresponding software tools in a fraction of the time. I can't really imagine writing code for an embedded OS target without having visualization tools like Tracealyzer at the ready.
- Visualization of complex process interactions, times, dependencies
- Organization of data streamed from the OS target in a meaningful way
- More support for resource constrained bare metal systems with limited memory
- Out of the box use without too much integration or trouble to get running
- The initial licensing costs and maintenance costs are negligible compared to the time a developer can spend trying to troubleshoot some deep OS intrinsic without the proper insight tools.
- Tracealyzer costs are negligible compared to the time to develop, test, and maintain custom debug tools and corresponding desktop software.
Do you think Percepio Tracealyzer delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Percepio Tracealyzer's feature set?
Yes
Did Percepio Tracealyzer live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Percepio Tracealyzer go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Percepio Tracealyzer again?
Yes