Short on IT, then choose Prophix
January 23, 2019

Short on IT, then choose Prophix

Bryan Blount | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User

Overall Satisfaction with Prophix

Prophix implementation is being managed in two phases: the first phase has focused on descriptive uses (i.e. real-time budget reports at the department manager level, P&L reports, income statements, balance statements). The second phase will focus on predictive reporting. We plan to add data inputs from our ERP system that will allow for a more in-depth budget forecasting capability.

Our business problem was the fact that our previous financial reporting platform, Microsoft Management Reporter, did not meet the needs of the business. We found, in addition to the possibility that MMR could be deprecated just like Microsoft's previous reporting system, FRX, had been deprecated, that Management Reporter (1) was difficult to develop new reports, (2) was restricted to an on-premise solution which requires resource expenditures - capital, physical infrastructure, and personnel, and (3) did not allow for real-time updates of end-user reports.

  • Prophix is web-based and can be linked to Active Directory authentication. This allows end users access to budget reports from any Internet accessible computer while still requiring authentication with your company's user credentials.
  • Prophix has a "drill across" function that allows an end user to easily display transaction details for any selected line item expense. Not only is detail provided for the current billing cycle, but all YTD details are displayed.
  • While the web page is a responsive web page (meaning the page size adjusts to the screen size of the device), it is not 100% responsive. This results in a less than desired user experience (in other words, accessing the web page on a phone is possible but can be a bit frustrating).
  • Positive: Prophix has enabled real-time budget accountability. Budget overages have decreased by an average of 8%.
We run an interface from Microsoft Great Plains Dynamics into the Prophix platform. The initial conversion required less than a half day of support.
On our campus, our IT group has a combination of on-prem and cloud-hosted applications. We examine several factors when choosing how to host an application: security, platform support, infrastructure support to name a few. We rate and compare platform requirements with platform end user experience to determine the best method of deployment. When evaluating any potential software vendor, I only consider vendors that offer multiple hosting options.
Overall, support is meeting our needs. Our only setback with the support team came when we were building our initial suite of reports. We found our developer had what appeared to be inexperience with higher education financials.
We evaluated BI360, Prophix, and Microsoft Dynamics. We chose Prophix primarily for the end user experience. We needed a platform that was intuitive, easy-to-use, cloud-based or on-prem, and vendor supported. Prophix checked all these requirements
To be perfectly honest, I have yet to come across an instance when the Prophix platform has not outperformed our legacy platform.

Prophix Feature Ratings

Long-term financial planning
Not Rated
Financial budgeting
10
Forecasting
Not Rated
Scenario modeling
Not Rated
Management reporting
10
Financial data consolidation
9
Journal entries and reports
10
Multi-currency management
Not Rated
Intercompany Eliminations
Not Rated
Minority Ownership
Not Rated
Local and consolidated reporting
Not Rated
Detailed Audit Trails
Not Rated
Financial Statement Reporting
9
Management Reporting
10
Excel-based Reporting
10
Automated board and financial reporting
Not Rated
Personalized dashboards
10
Color-coded scorecards
9
KPIs
Not Rated
Cost and profitability analysis
Not Rated
Key Performance Indicator setting
Not Rated
Benchmarking with external data
Not Rated
Flat file integration
9
Excel data integration
Not Rated
Direct links to 3rd-party data sources
10