(Mostly) success story
September 14, 2017
(Mostly) success story
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Overall Satisfaction with Workfront
- Provide transparency on work being done.
- Encourage communications in development teams.
- Documenting past decisions.
- Adding community Q&A is really helpful, because most of us go though the same issues or questions.
- Reporting. Most reports are configured by trial and error, details on fields would be appreciated.
- Popup-like function so when a user is blocked, they are given tips on why they could be blocked. Less intervention by admin.
- Workfront is intimidating to new users, there could be an easier way for them to adopt the product.
- Efficiency: more adapatable to change.
- Efficiency: standard product development process.
- Efficiency: provide value over cost-time-quality constraints.
Project Insight: straight project planner, no collaboration
Rally: too expensive for what we needed
JIRA: too many modules to integrate
Daptiv & Innotas: more of a portfolio management tool than a program/project, and more expensive
Workfront was the only one that checked all the requirements, plus ease of use from a user point of view.
Rally: too expensive for what we needed
JIRA: too many modules to integrate
Daptiv & Innotas: more of a portfolio management tool than a program/project, and more expensive
Workfront was the only one that checked all the requirements, plus ease of use from a user point of view.