What users are saying about
Top Rated
55 Ratings
6 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 8 out of 101
Top Rated
55 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 8.9 out of 101

Add comparison

Likelihood to Recommend

Aerospike Database

Compared to Redis and memcacheD, high availibity is best from Aerospike. Load balancing is also well done through Aerospike. If you're doing K/V lookups data exceeds more than 1MB, then Aerospike definitely fits the bill. However, it is not best as a document store. It is really atrocious in that nature. If anything look @ Mongo or something else then.
Anson Abraham profile photo

Redis

Good for:
  • Low latency queries are a must
  • Frequent point queries as it is a key-value store
  • Use awesome Redis Modules (Redis Search, Redis Neural Net, Redis ML, Redis-Secondary, Redis Graph)
Not suitable for (as far as I know):
  • When values are complex objects and not simple data structures. Document stores are better for those work loads
  • Huge data and not feasible (due to budget constraints) to scale up RAM
Nitin Pasumarthy profile photo

Feature Rating Comparison

NoSQL Databases

Aerospike Database
Redis
8.2
Performance
Aerospike Database
Redis
8.8
Availability
Aerospike Database
Redis
8.8
Concurrency
Aerospike Database
Redis
8.4
Security
Aerospike Database
Redis
6.4
Scalability
Aerospike Database
Redis
9.2
Data model flexibility
Aerospike Database
Redis
7.7
Deployment model flexibility
Aerospike Database
Redis
8.0

Pros

  • Scales really quickly and easily. Can deploy a new cluster or add to a cluster fairly quick.
  • MGMT UI is easy to use. Utilizing cli, makes it easy to "autoscale" for us.
  • The sharding removes any need to overlook to make sure if balanced correctly.
  • HA is dead simple, that almost little to no need figure out how to do it.
Anson Abraham profile photo
  • In memory caching
  • Fast read and write access
  • Data structure based API
No photo available

Cons

  • Load balancing per network segments.
  • Reduction in price.
  • Cross datacenter replication usage isn't so straightforward. Sometimes cross dc replication can have issues of bad data..
Anson Abraham profile photo
  • Clustering and sharding
  • Self managing for high availability
  • Failover
No photo available

Likelihood to Renew

Aerospike Database8.0
Based on 1 answer
If money isn't an issue, and you're not on the cloud, then I'd go with Aerospike. If you're the cloud ie, aws or azure, then i'd stick with dynamoDB or Cosmos then. Aerospike is definitely not something you want to put into the cloud. It doesn't work well w/ cross regions. If cross DC, you'll have to write some stuff for data integrity checks.
Anson Abraham profile photo
Redis9.2
Based on 10 answers
They have a good community to support our current needs. Their read write speed and rich set of datatypes are other major factors
prakash ps profile photo

Usability

No score
No answers yet
No answers on this topic
Redis9.0
Based on 1 answer
Redis has been around for very long and it is good at what it does. It proved to be very valuable in my use case for interfacing between two applications with very little code as it has drivers for almost every language out there and the community support is really good.
No photo available

Alternatives Considered

Compared to the above for K/V lookups and writes, it is faster. However, less than 1 MB, i'd use Redis, if you're willing to write package for HA in Redis. However HA between Redis and aerospike, aerospike is top notch. K/V lookups were 20-30% faster than Redis, 50% faster than Mongo, and 45% faster than Cassandra. But again, aerospike is really expensive.
Anson Abraham profile photo
Redis is definitely the more established one among the two and it has been here for a while so it has better support and documentation and obviously more stable than CouchDB; also at the time I started, CouchDB was just starting out and didn't gain much popularity like it has now
No photo available

Return on Investment

  • Less mgmt headaches, prompting time to focus on other issues.
  • HA, required little handholding. And minimization of downtime.
  • Cross region replication is not great, which sometimes requires data integrity checks on your end.
Anson Abraham profile photo
  • It was worth it. Got the job done fast and accurately.
  • No complaints whatsoever. I don't plan to explore other alternatives anytime soon.
No photo available

Pricing Details

Aerospike Database

General
Free Trial
Free/Freemium Version
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Entry-level set up fee?
No
Additional Pricing Details

Aerospike Database More Information

Redis

General
Free Trial
Free/Freemium Version
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Entry-level set up fee?
No
Additional Pricing Details

Redis More Information